Town Square

Post a New Topic

Dog Mauling in Palo Alto

Original post made by barbara, Duveneck/St. Francis, on Aug 30, 2006

I am an animal lover...of all animals. However, if an animal cannot be controled by it's owner, who can control it? These dogs (the three pit bulls) should not have been out in public. [Two sentences deleted by Palo Alto Online staff.] It is a terrible story and no one should have to go through such a tragedy as losing a family memeber in such a horrible way. I am so very sorry for Mrs. Kamikihara and what she will always remember.
b. cameron

Comments (6)

Like this comment
Posted by DJ
a resident of Palo Verde
on Aug 31, 2006 at 8:42 am

Pitbulls do not belong in a family oriented residential community. I know I am going to open a can of worms with what I have said ... this brings us back to the debate of banning pitbulls as a pet and the pitbull owners standing up for them.

Pitbull breed is known to attack, they were breeded to attack .. its the nature of that breed. The people who own such type of dog need to exercise caution - owning three of these at a time and taking them for a walk together ????? What was this owner thinking ?

Like this comment
Posted by To Afraid to Use Name
a resident of Duveneck School
on Aug 31, 2006 at 11:37 pm

This brings up leash laws in general.

I believe that 99% of dogs are great 99% of the time (approx). We should be able to go to leash-required areas such as schools (off hours) and play without any fear of unleashed dogs (yes, the risk is low, but there is still some). However, the Palo Alto schools are used after hours as dog runs. Everyone knows this, but the police fail to enforce the laws. Either enforce the laws or change them. Everyone believes their dogs are safe, but we know not everyone is safe. But I don't want my child (nor any other child) to be the one example.

Like this comment
Posted by It is not the leash law
a resident of Crescent Park
on Sep 7, 2006 at 12:44 pm

That is at fault in this situation, but the inability of the woman with 3 dogs to control her dogs adequately.

The pit bull breed standard is that they are bred to be dog aggressive, not human aggressive, and it sounds like these dogs were up to the behavioral standard. That is why a physically strong handler is important, as well as knowing one's physical limits. Walking 3 strong dogs at the same time is difficult for most people.

It is illegal to ban any breed of dog in this state. Blame the deed, not the breed.

Like this comment
Posted by Perriann
a resident of another community
on Sep 8, 2006 at 10:55 pm

Totally agree. The standard for the American Pit Bull Terrier states that some dog aggression will be tolerated, but unprovoked aggression on a human is totally unacceptable, and uncharacteristic of the breed. Considering there are upwards of four to six million pit bulls alive today, and only 0.000002 percent cause any problems, (coincidentally the same percentage of attacks as any other breed)this problem, although overreported by the media, is totally controllable if people would just use common sense with their pets. Don't let them run loose, speuter them for God's sake, and socialize them. If those things weren't too much for the average dog owner to handle, these situations would be nonexistent.

Like this comment
Posted by Perriann
a resident of another community
on Sep 8, 2006 at 10:58 pm

Oh, and another interesting tidbit. The owner of the little dog that was killed was repeatedly told not to come near the woman's dogs, yet for some reason this woman actually came across the street towards the dogs. It seems to me like she either was pretty stupid, or she wanted to prove a point by sacrificing her dog. I am hoping she was just stupid and has learned from her mistake, but who knows what she was thinking? If someone told me not to get near their dog, I think I would probably listen, since they must know it more than I could. And only one of the dogs attacked. The other two just stood there. Such a strange situation.

Like this comment
Posted by Responsibility
a resident of Midtown
on Sep 9, 2006 at 5:20 pm

For whatever reason Yogloo's owner came towards the 3 dogs, she is paying an immeasurable price by the loss of her dog. So is the other dog owner. We don't know why Yogloo's owner insisted on waling up to them, nor do we know why the 3 dogs were walked all at the same time. We all make errors of judgement, and most of the time, the consequences are not nearly so awful.

It is wise that Calif. law PROHIBITS the banning of any breed of dog, and anyway, Diamond was technically incorrect in stating it was a pit bull which killed Yogloo; it was a mixed breed dog. Twisting the facts to suit her purposes is her ongoing m.o.; it makes for poor journalism. We're lucky she isn't a Calif. legislator! And really - she doesn't look like a golden retriever, but it's ironic that she chose that breed to represent herself. My child was bit in the face by one in downtown Los Altos 18 months ago...

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Food Party! 420
By Laura Stec | 8 comments | 2,064 views

What Are Your Gifts that Must Be Shared?
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,054 views


Best Of Palo Alto ballot is here

It's time to decide what local business is worthy of the title "Best Of Palo Alto" — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 29th. Stay tuned for the results in the July 21st issue of the Palo Alto Weekly.