Town Square

Post a New Topic

Highway Robbery in the Works

Original post made by Crescent Park Dad, Crescent Park, on Jul 20, 2012

Over my dead body.

Sure, I'd be more than happy to have a government installed GPS device installed in my car, then charge me $0.10/mile to drive. Perhaps I should just give you my PIN to my ATM and just let you have at my bank account. Oh, and track my whereabouts while you're at it.

Who exactly is representing our town/county on these two boards (ABAG & MTC)? What a complete and total waste of time and money. The taxpayers will never go for this. Why waste any money on "a study"? Ridiculous.

Big Brother and a cash grab all at once. Insane.

Web Link

Comments (4)

Like this comment
Posted by Resident
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jul 20, 2012 at 11:37 am

Blame the electric cars, hybrids, volts, leafs, teslas, etc.

They have to be the reason otherwise they would just tax gas. Not a surprising move by the Government.

I can see that the ones who will vote yes will be gas guzzler drivers, and the ones voting no will be electric vehicle drivers!

Like this comment
Posted by not going to happen
a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on Jul 20, 2012 at 12:08 pm

I really doubt they could ever make the logistics work on something like that. How do you keep people from tampering with their systems?

If they need more money for road projects, they should just increase the gas tax. Really not fair to keep using sales tax and property tax money for road projects.

I don't have an electric car, but I don't mind if people use them to avoid paying gas taxes, since they do create vastly less air pollution than gas burning cars. This is the same reason that they let electric cars use the carpool lanes, right?

Like this comment
Posted by anonymous
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Jul 20, 2012 at 12:31 pm

"Bay Area drivers could pay up to $1 per mile to drive under tax proposal" - Mike Rosenberg, Bay Area News Group ('Are you kidding me?', The Daily News, July 18, 2012, p.A7) This was so compelling, I ripped out and saved this hardcopy article.

Whatever the amount would be, whatver they claim, it is a totally outrageous idea/plan. This Metropolitan Transportation Commission and ABAG (Assoc of Bay Area Governments) are out of control.

I have read/heard different things about whether voter approval would be needed. I think it is more about government grasping for more money (to pay for the MTC and ABAG -- what do their "staff" and operations cost?!) rather than traffic reduction. I get that there are regional transportation and housing issues/concerns, but there needs to be a better way of planning for this.

Like this comment
Posted by anonymous
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Jul 20, 2012 at 12:46 pm

More from the same article:
"...drivers would likely have to install GPS-like trackers on their cars to tally travel in the nine-county Bay Area, from freeways to neighborhood streets, with only low-income people excepted."

ok, I assume whoever manufacturers the transponders (which I don't have as I don't commute over a bridge)is lobbying for this plan so they can make a TON of money

PLUS, we will - as usual - have to subsidize/pay for "low inome" - however that level is defined -- this entire thing is just a bunch of additional bureaucratic nonsense we cannot afford.

What we need are some decent, responsible politicians who will reduce government bureaucracy and nutty plans. Oh, City of Palo Alto,perhaps you can pave the streets and fix the potholes in front of the $2M homes (what do people THINK who visit here and see this?) it is inconsistent with what I have seen elsewhere.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Why contentious local politics? More examples from ADU at Council
By Douglas Moran | 49 comments | 2,343 views

Food Party! 420
By Laura Stec | 6 comments | 1,825 views

What Are Your Gifts that Must Be Shared?
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 863 views


Best Of Palo Alto ballot is here

It's time to decide what local business is worthy of the title "Best Of Palo Alto" — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 29th. Stay tuned for the results in the July 21st issue of the Palo Alto Weekly.