Town Square

Post a New Topic

Full speed ahead on the bike bridge

Original post made by svatoid, Midtown, on Jun 14, 2012

Check out item 8 from monday's council meeting

Web Link

"8. Approve and Authorize the City Manager to Execute Contract Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. C10135025 in the Amount of $266,647 with Alta Planning + Design for Preliminary Design and Environmental Assessment Services for the Pedestrian & Bicycle Overpass at Highway 101 (PE-11011) and Feasibility Study of Adobe Creek Reach Trail Project Leading to the Overpass for a Total Contract Amount Not to Exceed $338,929. "

Looks like, despite our financial problems, we are committing $300K+ for a study and millions afterwards for the bridge. Where will the money come from--not an issue for the council.
This is just another thing that the city cannot live without.

Comments (6)

Like this comment
Posted by Kate
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Jun 14, 2012 at 12:03 pm

And they want DONATIONS to keep the water running into Foothill Park???? while spending millions on a bike bridge that isn't really necessary now. This is beyond ridiculous. And the city continues to hire 'big brass' with staff,no doubt. Yes, Keene is a big disappointment. This after Benest and another wishy-washy council. Will there ever be a stiff-spined City Council that will really take charge. Maybe we need finally an elected mayor who runs the city and is responsible to the electorate. YES, it is time.

Like this comment
Posted by trivial cost
a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on Jun 14, 2012 at 3:36 pm

We're spending $100 million dollars on new Hwy 101 onramps in Palo Alto. You read that right: $100,000,000 of your tax dollars (mostly county sales tax money). Now you are whining about a comparatively trivial amount of money for very useful pedestrian projects? If you want to whine, you're looking in the wrong place.

Like this comment
Posted by svatoid
a resident of Midtown
on Jun 14, 2012 at 6:37 pm

Trivial cost-you need to found out where the money is coming from for the 101 project and where the money will come from for this bridge. Also do the math on cost per user for 101 and the bike bridge. Then get back to us

Like this comment
Posted by Crescent Park Dad
a resident of Crescent Park
on Jun 17, 2012 at 4:32 pm

At least the 101 widening project is part of the county sales tax dollars that we (as a county) voted for. There is no such vote for the bike bridge --- and there is no funding either. Liz Kniss's attempt at the (Stanford) money grab is failing already.

This is like money, very expensive, but let's build it anyway.

Like this comment
Posted by svatoid
a resident of Midtown
on Jun 17, 2012 at 4:55 pm

We have to build one now since mountain view just opened a new bike bridge over 101. Also it had to be nicer than the one in mountain view. After all,.we have to be more bike friendly than any other city. Money is no object-.

Like this comment
Posted by Duveneck/St Francis Grandad
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Jun 18, 2012 at 8:57 am

Finding money for bikes and pedestrians is never easy. Cars, no problem. 101 is now up to 10 lanes! Mountain View has a vision of the future, not the past. Bikes are the future. Cars are the past. The mid-peninsula could be a bikers/pedestrians paradise, with our weather, and with our fine regional train service. But the cars are choking us.

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Burger chain Shake Shack to open in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 18 comments | 5,005 views

The Cost of Service
By Aldis Petriceks | 1 comment | 1,212 views

This time we're not lying. HONEST! No, really!
By Douglas Moran | 11 comments | 846 views

Couples: When Wrong Admit It; When Right; Shut Up
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 738 views

One-on-one time
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 565 views