Town Square

Post a New Topic

To control diesel fuel spill, city plans to dig up Matadero Creek bank

Original post made on Jun 25, 2021

In an effort to rid Matadero Creek of the last vestiges of a May 6 fuel spill that has contaminated the waterway, experts plan to dig up the soil next to the creek bed to extract pollutants that might be trapped.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, June 25, 2021, 9:33 AM

Comments (3)

Posted by Online Name
a resident of Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Jun 25, 2021 at 10:46 am

Online Name is a registered user.

Didn't the City Manager issue a statement right after the spill happened saying everything was ducky? And yet again "concerned residents" had to prove it wasn't ducky to get some action, this time by taking their own samples just like they/we have had to take our ow traffic surveys, hire our own lawyers and arborists to challenge the city's claims...

Posted by anon1234
a resident of College Terrace
on Jun 25, 2021 at 12:11 pm

anon1234 is a registered user.

Great that cleanup mitigation measures continue. It sounds like so far all testing has been done on the water. I’m not a expert but shouldn’t soil samples be tested in the areas along the creek before the fragile riparian habitat is disturbed by “tillage and extraction” ? I am just asking.

Posted by Not Good Enough
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jun 25, 2021 at 1:21 pm

Not Good Enough is a registered user.

Of course soil sampling interfacing with the creek should have been done long along, including well downstream.

The VA and City are stringing us along– they assured us at the start this was all contained, had not traveled downstream of the booms let alone into Bol Park where they first delayed then later had to put in containment booms and warning signs to keep people away from the creek.

This report notes that next week a plan will be made for the sides of the creek to be tilled to better extract contamination since it's not going away. Next it states that soil testing will be discussed. Surely testing will happen before tilling, though this is hardly clear. Tilling will release more contamination – that's the point and price to pay (VA’s in fines I hope) for causing this toxic spill. All soil tests and locations should be noted and mapped just as they are now in public reports.

Why does the map still wrongly advise us: “Data was collected immediately [not true - it took days] after the spill upstream as a control (point of reference) [not true – this area was contaminated so not a control] location (W-016) and downstream of the boom containment area (W-003). Since the release of the data, two more booms were installed upstream of W-003 and upstream of W-002, since it appears that some of the contaminants may be making their way through the containment zone, as indicated in the W-003…”

City - how about updating old informaiton that is simply inaccurate?

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Palo Alto Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

Craving a two-foot pizza? Pizzone serves Milan-style magic in Palo Alto.
By The Peninsula Foodist | 2 comments | 6,380 views

PA's downtown business problems not simple to solve
By Diana Diamond | 5 comments | 5,348 views

"It's too little too late" and other reasons why not
By Sherry Listgarten | 13 comments | 4,372 views

Recall Election Reform: Forgetting that the talking points were only that
By Douglas Moran | 12 comments | 2,926 views

Couples and Premarital: Parallel Living: What to Do
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 2,591 views