Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, December 1, 2020, 9:15 AM
Town Square
Newsom: State leaders could issue stay-at-home order
Original post made on Dec 1, 2020
Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, December 1, 2020, 9:15 AM
Comments (5)
a resident of Greenmeadow
on Dec 1, 2020 at 4:48 pm
Native to the BAY is a registered user.
And Palo Altans are so self involved, busy organizing a referendum to bar public , open space access. Do BLM and All Lives matter? Absurd. Why don’t these snobs organize a food, toilet paper or utility payment drive, instead. Put any extra personal wealth , energy for something for the larger common good . Get your head out of the Internet Zoom hole and live life .
a resident of Crescent Park
on Dec 2, 2020 at 8:44 am
Lee Forrest is a registered user.
Governor Newsom's advisements could gain some additional public acceptance if he and other Democratic leaders throughout the state (including London Breed/SF, Sam Licardo/SJ, Sheila Kuell/LA, & Nancy Pelosi) actually practiced what they preach.
a resident of Midtown
on Dec 2, 2020 at 11:26 am
Nayeli is a registered user.
@Native to the BAY - I believe that you're commenting to the wrong article. This has nothing to do with the attempt by radical and perpetually-offended activists (who claim that Palo Alto and its residents are "racists") to sue to stop the city from having a nature preserve that limits access to residents.
a resident of Ventura
on Dec 2, 2020 at 12:14 pm
Jane is a registered user.
State overreach, and lockdowns don't work. Figure out how to manage with the risk, not multiply the harm. My god they haven't learned anything.
You can't stop people from drowning by telling them to hold their breath longer -- they are going to breathe and live. What the state wants to do however is hold everyone's head underwater indefinitely.
If you are at risk or afraid, then take measures to protect yourself. *That* is the responsible way to manage this.
a resident of Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Dec 2, 2020 at 3:24 pm
mauricio is a registered user.
This is much more than about protecting yourself. When you are out in public you will infect others if you are infected, or you might get infected and then infect others, or infect family members or people you meet in person who will then infect others, which is exactly why we can't slow down the pandemic and are closing in on 300,000 fatalities.
We lost many of our personal freedoms when the nation went into hysteria in the aftermath of 2700 fatalities on 9/11, but trying to deal with millions of infected people and almost 300,000 fatalities is "state overreach". Speak of a parallel universe.
In the absence of an effective vaccine, lockdowns and mask wearing are the ONLY measures that work. Not only isn't a lockdown state overreach, the state should have enforced a lockdown back in March.
Don't miss out
on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.
Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.
See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.

Get the most important local news stories sent straight to your inbox daily.
Craving B. Patisserie's perfect pastries? The San Francisco bakery is popping up in San Mateo next week
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 12,198 views
Demystifying heat pump water heaters
By Sherry Listgarten | 11 comments | 2,960 views
Dry January Last Week? LOL
By Laura Stec | 0 comments | 2,851 views
Which Christmas Gifts are Lasting?
By Cheryl Bac | 2 comments | 1,705 views
Premarital and Couples: Join the Club . . .
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,391 views