It would be feasible to use the gym at Cubberley but apparently no one has considered this possibility.

Simply put, most Palo Altans don't care. They would rather the homeless go somewhere else and freeze to death or perish from pneumonia. Welcome to nouveau PA where the elite only mingle amongst themselves.

I've allowed some homeless individuals to spend the night in my garage but now some neighbors are complaining. Apparently they think they are going to get burglarized and/or their residential property values will go down. Such shallow people.

Kudos to the above listed organizations for doing what they can.

A homeless 'tent city' at the PA City Hall Plaza would certainly draw some media attention. Perhaps this is the next step in generating further awareness.

The majority of Palo Alto residents are not known for their compassion and would just as soon look the other way in regards to the homeless issue...this is par for the course.

It seems that most Palo Altans only get up in arms over homeless issues like the President Hotel when the apparent 'victims' meet a certain social standard and the scenario is viewed as a direct infringement on specific and individually-based Palo Alto quality of life perspectives.

Despite its reputation as a progressive and liberal-minded city, Palo Alto residents can be very judgemental on their own accord...especially when it comes to social issues of a broader scale. Money and self-importance is their blinder.

There was an interesting meme doing the rounds on Facebook about all the hype over the song "Baby it's cold outside". It seems people are more concerned about the song offended than being offended by the fact that there are people who are sleeping outside in the cold.

If everyone who complained about the song thought about what it really means to sleep outside overnight in the cold and did something practical to help them, it would make a much bigger difference to the world than the outrage about the song.

> The majority of Palo Alto residents are not known for their compassion and would just as soon look the other way in regards to the homeless issue...this is par for the course.

How about if 1 out of 5 adult Palo Alto residents bought either Patagonia fleece-wear, a North Face down sleeping bag (or down jacket/vest), or even a nice dome tent and distributed them to the first homeless person they encountered on a particular day?

Wouldn't that would go a long ways towards showing community concern + it would maintain a certain upscale appearance among our city's homeless population? People could even distribute take-out orders from some of Palo Alto's finer restaurants as well.

In Palo Alto, there's no need for the homeless to look so downtrodden. We can all help by improving their outwards appearance.

This consideration will also be of value to those who happen to have vagrants in their respective PA neighborhoods. If prospective home buyers see nicely attired homeless people, they will not question the safety or investment value of the respective homes being listed for sale.

We can all do our part for both the homeless population in Palo Alto and residential property values as well.

Like a house, looking good goes a long ways in terms of overall perceptions.

The sarcastic and accusatory posts here are despicable. The fact is that Palo Altans are among the most generous and helpful people toward the homeless in the entire world. Homelessness is a nationwide problem and it's not possible for one town of 60,000 residents to solve it, but that doesn't mean we don't have compassion and care for the downtrodden. Meanwhile the President of the country is more interested in shutting down the government and building walls than helping Americans get back on their feet.

> The fact is that Palo Altans are among the most generous and helpful people toward the homeless in the entire world.

Which world are you living in or referring to?

Inquiring minds want to know.

> In Palo Alto, there's no need for the homeless to look so downtrodden. We can all help by improving their outwards appearance.

^^^Was this your prime example of Palo Alto generosity?

Instead of 'spare change' we'll just hand-out gift cards to Macy's and Nordstroms.

QUOTE: The fact is that Palo Altans are among the most generous and helpful people toward the homeless in the entire world.

^^^A bit of stretch, wouldn't you say? Most Palo Alto residents (along with their NIMBY persuasions & sensitivities) are not very welcoming to transient RVs parked along the streets...even if parked far from their own neighborhoods of actual residency.

Many are 'helpful' from the standpoint of complaining to the PAPD or the PA Weekly over these RVs and 'generous' when it comes to editorial support of the homeless who meet specific criteria (i.e. the soon-to-be displaced residents of the President Hotel).

Then again, this so-called support of the evicted President Hotel residents might simply be predicated on anti-development sentiments rather than any actual concern for a homeless individual.

Touching.

> The majority of Palo Alto residents are not known for their compassion and would just as soon look the other way in regards to the homeless issue...this is par for the course.
> Most Palo Alto residents (along with their NIMBY persuasions & sensitivities) are not very welcoming to transient RVs parked along the streets...even if parked far from their own neighborhoods of actual residency.
Lastly,
> In Palo Alto, there's no need for the homeless to look so downtrodden. We can all help by improving their outwards appearance.

Which is why me and my 'downtrodden' family will continue to park our run-down looking RV wherever we darn well please in Palo Alto. You got it?

I'm curious why you prefer to park your RV illegally in Palo Alto rather than legally in an RV park with proper facilities in one of the surrounding communities. A friend of mine resides in a mobile home park in Santa Clara, which seems lovely.

"I'm curious why you prefer to park your RV illegally in Palo Alto rather than legally in an RV park with proper facilities in one of the surrounding communities. A friend of mine resides in a mobile home park in Santa Clara, which seems lovely."

**A typical smug PA resident NIMBY response. FYI...Some transient RV owners/dwellers cannot afford to rent the space in a 'lovely' RV park. Care to take up a collection and contribute? I thought so.

"The fact is that Palo Altans are among the most generous and helpful people toward the homeless in the entire world."

**Yes. They most certainly are....not in terms of any money but in terms of self-serving suggestions.

>> I'm curious why you prefer to park your RV illegally in Palo Alto rather than legally in an RV park with proper facilities in one of the surrounding communities. A friend of mine resides in a mobile home park in Santa Clara, which seems lovely."

How 'lovely'. Would they still be your friend if they parked their RV in front of your house or somewhere else in Palo Alto where it really doesn't concern you?

Posted by RV Dweller, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood

>> How 'lovely'. Would they still be your friend if they parked their RV in front of your house or somewhere else in Palo Alto where it really doesn't concern you?

Honestly, if we had a well-accepted generally-recognized algorithm for determining who really is a long-term resident of Palo Alto, I would happily contribute additional tax dollars to pay for apartments for all needy long-term Palo Alto residents. Likewise, a home somewhere in California of all needy long-term California residents, and, likewise, a home somewhere in the US for all long-term US residents. I would like to add "the world" to that equation as well, but, nobody has figured out how to do that efficiently and effectively.

That said, I don't recognize your right to park your RV on public streets, in Palo Alto or anywhere else. Or, for RVs to be used generally in lieu of either housing or hotels/motels. RVs are blight, akin to biblical mildew, locusts, and grasshoppers. RVs are a terribly inefficient method of creating housing. They also are contribute to employers unfairly exploiting taxpaying residents. Why should Stanford employees be allowed to park RVs on El Camino. Stanford should house its own employees, or, pay them enough to find their own places.

In short, I hope you find a nice apartment soon.

> RVs are blight, akin to biblical mildew, locusts, and grasshoppers. RVs are a terribly inefficient method of creating housing.
> A friend of mine resides in a mobile home park in Santa Clara, which seems lovely.
> In Palo Alto, there's no need for the homeless to look so downtrodden. We can all help by improving their outwards appearance.
We can all do our part for both the homeless population in Palo Alto and residential property values as well.
> The fact is that Palo Altans are among the most generous and helpful people toward the homeless in the entire world.

And the kicker...

> How about if 1 out of 5 adult Palo Alto residents bought either Patagonia fleece-wear, a North Face down sleeping bag (or down jacket/vest), or even a nice dome tent and distributed them to the first homeless person they encountered on a particular day?

Wouldn't that would go a long ways towards showing community concern + it would maintain a certain upscale appearance among our city's homeless population? People could even distribute take-out orders from some of Palo Alto's finer restaurants as well.

Excuse me while I go upchuck dear Palo Altans as your 'typical' heartfelt concern for others less fortunate is truly touching and magnanimous...not.

Nice to be living somewhere else now. A nice (and presumably wealthy family from overseas purchased our former residence in PA) and they can deal with this pervasive mentality...incredible.

If the estimated 3 million plus illegal Aliens in this state were deported. I’m sure the RV dwellers could find affordable housing.

" in this state were deported "

Or we could just amnesty them like Ronald Reagan did.

The republicans had the house and senate for two years - why didn't Trump deport them? Just too busy getting his family and the corporate tax cuts? Or too impudent of a politician to get anything accomplished?

Republican donors/owners/masters (billionaires) love low wage labor. They don't care about actually helping anyone but themselves.

Man, that's really sad, the way they used conservative voters. Low energy, too.

I am not an illegal alien from Mexico but some say I look like one. Born in Jalisco and legally immigrated to the United States at 4 (with my parents).

I am also an anti-illegal immigration registered Republican voter. These Honduran refugees need to go through proper channels prior to entry. In the meantime, they should be repelled at the borders. I do not like (and resent) being compared with them by strangers who do not know me personally. I am a union tradesman (welder) and pay my federal/state/county taxes accordingly. I do not pay these taxes to support undocumented refugees or their kind through entitlement social services.

The borders need to be secured as some Middle-Easterners also look Hispanic and even speak Spanish. My Iranian friend is sometimes mistaken for a Mexican as he resembles Cheech Marin o Cheech and Chong. He is also an American citizen.

^^^^Some terrorists will be able to sneak into the USA if borders are not secured.
While a wall may be excessive and expensive, perhaps the National Guard can assist and support the US Border Patrol for added manpower coverage.

Our system cannot support and has no obligation to assist illegal immigrants from anywhere. That is their home country's responsibility.

We need more Cisco's & fewer wall-bangers as seen on the TV news.

A high school education and/or a viable trade should be a minimum prerequisite for entry into the United States.

Social services and ESL classes are already overburdened.

Nice. Take a thread about helping homeless and turn it into racist rants filled with lies (middle eastern terrorists are not crossing the border, etc.)

What would Jesus do?

QUOTE: Take a thread about helping homeless and turn it into racist rants filled with lies (middle eastern terrorists are not crossing the border, etc.)

What would Jesus do?

Jesus would probably try to express compassion for all. On the other hand, he did get the short end of the stick for sticking to his convictions.

Curious. What is the point of asking what he might/would do? Nobody on Earth lives up to his standards so it is a moot point at best.