Town Square

Post a New Topic

Flawed VTA Proposed Guidelines for Caltrain Grade Separations

Original post made by Arthur Keller, Adobe-Meadow, on Oct 4, 2017

Currently, roads cross the Caltrain tracks in eight locations in Palo Alto, Mountain View, and Sunnyvale. Grade separation is having the road go over or under the train tracks, by moving the train tracks up or down and/or the road up or down. The sales tax increase on the November 2016 ballot (Measure B) included $700 million towards the expense of building grade separations in Palo Alto, Mountain View, and Sunnyvale. The VTA Board controls how Measure B funds (the sales tax increase on the November 2016 ballot) are to be spent. The VTA Board will meet on Thursday, October 5 at 5:30pm to adopt flawed guidelines for Caltrain Grade Separation funding.

Agenda Item 6.3 on the Consent Calendar is "ACTION ITEM -1) Adopt a Resolution, establishing the 2016 Measure B Program; and 2) adopt the 2016 Measure B Program Category Guidelines.” These guidelines are on pages 40-41 of Web Link as follows:

Caltrain Grade Separations

Proposed Guidelines

This program category will fund grade separations in the cities of Sunnyvale, Mountain View, and Palo Alto. VTA, working in collaboration with the three cities and other partners, is proposing to develop an implementation plan for delivering the eight grade separation projects. Once the implementation plan is complete, funds will be distributed as candidate projects move forward in readiness.

The amount of funding in 2016 Measure B will likely not be enough to fully fund all eight projects listed in the Caltrain Grade Separation Program Category. To complete all eight projects, VTA would allocate 2016 Measure B funding to the most cost-effective grade separation alternatives possible. Additionally, VTA anticipates that outside funding sources will need to be secured to complete the program.

VTA is also recommending that the grade separation projects apply Complete Streets best practices in order to improve transit, bicycle and pedestrian elements at the intersections.

Recommended Funding for FY 2018-19

VTA is recommending $7 million for FY 2018-19 which will be used to fund the implementation plan, as well as any potential design and/or environmental work that cities may be able to advance.

What does this mean? It means that funds will be allocated first-come-first-served to the cheapest way to get grade separations. That may well mean that the our efforts to build better but more costly grade separations will get lower priority, maybe even no money at all, even if Palo Alto funds the difference.

We should request better language that is fairer to all cities and promotes the best designs, not the cheapest.

Instead of the highlighted sentence above, the following language should be used:

To complete all eight projects, VTA shall divide the 2016 Measure B funding equally in 2017 dollars among the eight projects listed in the Caltrain Grade Separation Program Category. Designs higher than baseline costs will require additional local and other funding. VTA will work with collectively with the cities to secure funds from outside sources to complete the program.

What can you do?

1. Write to the VTA Board at board.secretary@vta.org and copy the Palo Alto City Council at city.council@cityofpaloalto.org (and blind copy me if you would like). Ask them to remove item 6.3 from the Consent Calendar and change the language for Caltrain Grade Separations to divide the available funds equally among all the affected grade crossings.

2. Speak at the VTA Board meeting. The meeting starts at 5:30pm and is at the County Board of Supervisors Chambers in the County Government Center, 70 West Hedding Street, San Jose, CA 95110 (at the corner of North First Street). Fill out a comment card for item 6.3. You will have two minutes to speak. You may take light rail there from the Mountain View Station (at Castro Street). If you choose to drive there, you may park in the lot at North San Pedro behind the County Government Center after 5pm. The entrance on West Hedding St is open after 5pm (while the other entrances are closed after 5pm).

Comments (7)

Posted by john_alderman
a resident of Crescent Park
on Oct 4, 2017 at 1:48 pm

john_alderman is a registered user.

Do you have a list of the eight projects?


Posted by Curmudgeon
a resident of Downtown North
on Oct 4, 2017 at 4:17 pm

"To complete all eight projects, VTA shall divide the 2016 Measure B funding equally in 2017 dollars among the eight projects listed in the Caltrain Grade Separation Program Category."

An ironclad prescription for inaction, unless some project happens to get enough $$$ to complete. Fund in order of most critical project first.

"Designs higher than baseline costs will require additional local and other funding. VTA will work with collectively with the cities to secure funds from outside sources to complete the program."

Sloppy wording. You particularly need to define "baseline costs". With precision.

In any case, this is a lot of money to put into an antique facility that is used by a tiny fraction of the population.


Posted by ODB
a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Oct 4, 2017 at 7:05 pm

I think I read on Clem's blog that the $700 million in measure B money could all be repurposed for the San Jose BART extension. Is this true?


Posted by john_alderman
a resident of Crescent Park
on Oct 4, 2017 at 8:32 pm

john_alderman is a registered user.

@ODB - The text of Measure B says $700m will be allocated for Sunnyvale, Mountain View, and Palo Alto for grade separation, however:

"If approved by a 3/4 majority of the VTA Board of Directors, and only after a noticed public meeting in which the County of Santa Clara Board of Supervisors, and the city council of each city in Santa Clara County have been notified at least 30 days prior to the meeting, VTA may modify the Program for any prudent purpose[...]"


Posted by Pat Burt
a resident of Community Center
on Oct 4, 2017 at 9:22 pm

Pat Burt is a registered user.

It is correct that a 3/4 vote of the VTA board could re allocate the grade separation funding. However, the political consequence would be huge for the VTA a NDA very unlikely to occur. The support for Measure B by the north (and west) county cities, along with was based on a carefully crafted agreement. Substantial changes to the agreement would likely result in long term harm to the political support for the VTA that would outweigh the benefits.


Posted by john_alderman
a resident of Crescent Park
on Oct 4, 2017 at 9:34 pm

john_alderman is a registered user.

@Pat Burt - Pat, I agree VTA won't arbitrarily try to take the money back. However they are saying, "VTA would allocate 2016 Measure B funding to the most cost-effective grade separation alternatives possible," which can be read to mean they are going to fund elevating the tracks, and if Palo Alto comes up with some expensive trench or tunneling scheme, they will send all the money to whichever city agrees to elevate first. That's a smart pragmatic way to get grade separation done, but it may not align with Palo Alto's grander vision for itself.


Posted by Pat Burt
a resident of Community Center
on Oct 4, 2017 at 9:42 pm

Pat Burt is a registered user.

Sorry for the phone typos. I meant to add that supervisor Simitian also achieved a commitment that BART funding would be capped at $1.5B or 25% of the total tax revenue, providing an additional safeguard against BART bleeding off the funds.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Palo Alto Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

Analysis/paralysis: The infamous ‘Palo Alto Process’ must go
By Diana Diamond | 6 comments | 2,297 views

Common Ground
By Sherry Listgarten | 3 comments | 1,841 views

The Time and Cost Savings of Avoiding a Long Commute
By Steve Levy | 6 comments | 1,638 views

Planting a Fall Garden?
By Laura Stec | 5 comments | 1,116 views

 

Sign-up now for 5K Run/Walk, 10k Run, Half Marathon

The 39th annual Moonlight Run and Walk is Friday evening, September 29. Join us under the light of the full Harvest Moon on a 5K walk, 5K run, 10K run or half marathon. Complete your race in person or virtually. Proceeds from the race go to the Palo Alto Weekly Holiday Fund, benefiting local nonprofits that serve families and children in Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties.

REGISTER