Buddhists believe that anything compound is transitory. Trying to preserve historic buildings is a losing battle against nature.

> Buddhists believe that anything compound is transitory.

A nice excuse for not doing anything.

Yes, the Sun will eventually expand and destroy the earth. But we can enjoy our fine historic buildings for many millenia if we are willing to look after them. Maintenance is not merely passive, but active.

"But we can enjoy our fine historic buildings "

It's not historic. It's just an old building with a facade that wouldn't pass code today.

...more evidence that it's "the end of the world as we know it"... but I'm not sure I feel fine. (Thanks for the lyrics borrow, R.E.M.)

Compared to other ancient, historic buildings in other parts of the world, this is quite a youngster. Since this was made of concrete, it was obviously not expected to last hundreds of years as others in Europe or Asia, or even on the west coast.

The moral must be if you want something to last, build it right in the first place.

If we don't save 100 year old buildings, they will never be 400 years old.
There is plenty of Roman concrete still around - as long as the rebar doesn't rust, concrete haas a very long life.

I question Bohdi's comment ...
Buddhists certainly didn't appreciate the Muslims in Afghanistan dynamiting their 1700 year old Buddhas of Bamiyan in 2000 that were carved into the mountain and have been working to restore them.

From the Telegraph.Co : Web Link

After failing to destroy the 1,700-year-old sandstone statues of Buddha with anti-aircraft and tank fire, the Taliban brought a lorryload of dynamite from Kabul. A Western observer said: "They drilled holes into the torsos of the two statues and then placed dynamite charges inside the holes to blow them up."

Kofi Annan, the United Nations Secretary-General, had pleaded with the Taliban's foreign minister, Wakil Ahmad Muttawakil, in Islamabad yesterday to save Afghanistan's cultural heritage. He was told that all other "moveable statues" - including more than a dozen smaller Buddha statues in the Kabul Museum - had also been destroyed.

--

On a more contemporary note, I remember marching into that bank building as a teen in 1970 and opening my first bank account at Bank of America.

King Asset Management is right nearby, at 265 Lytton Ave
Shouldn't be a problem getting a speedy and _competent_ repair.

No one will ever be injuried by a cornice piece falling off an Eichler.
Burned beyond recogmition perhaps, but never a crushed skull.
There is always a cost to historic preseration.

Hmm. I see in the future a plan to raze this dangerous, not up to code building and replacing it with an exorbitantly expensive office building.

One can always tell who came from out of town and doesn't care about local history by how off- hand they are concerning local history. I offer as reef nice the fight to retain the blimp hanger at Moffett. Outlanders said, "So what!". The US isn't as old as Europe. We need to save what we can.

The building will be fixed and restored with its historic charm. But these things don't happen overnight. We are bidding the job and the owners want to keep the historic aspects intact. Additionally, the city inspector deemed it unnecessary to cordon off the sidewalk- report should contact the city for correct details on this.

@Resident: "The widespread use of concrete in many Roman structures ensured that many survive to the present day. The Baths of Caracalla in Rome are just one example." -- Wikipedia. The Romans, however, avoided the modern mistake of leaving ugly bare concrete exposed (Watkins, IIRC)

"One can always tell who came from out of town and doesn't care about local history by how off- hand they are concerning local history"

One can always tell who thinks that being a long-time Palo Alto resident who pays very little in property tax and believes they somehow have the right to ossify the city.

@Me: apparently it's not that easy, because I grew up in PA, but moved out in 2003. Way out, to a place that's actually affordable. As to your reference to someone who thinks they can "ossify" the city......what, turn it to bone, harden it? Not sure exactly what you mean. I still don't appreciate newcomers who are willing to trash, demolish or turn to bone the old buildings.

"apparently it's not that easy, because I grew up in PA, but moved out in 2003. Way out, to a place that's actually affordable. As to your reference to someone who thinks they can "ossify" the city......what, turn it to bone, harden it? Not sure exactly what you mean. I still don't appreciate newcomers who are willing to trash, demolish or turn to bone the old buildings."

Moved out because it's unaffordable? You can blame the city elders for ossifying it. That's why you can't afford to live here.

As for newcomers, by whose measure is a "newcomer?" Since you have been gone for 13 years, does that reset your clock? Actually maybe that's worse - someone who doesn't live in (or apparently anywhere near by self-admission) our community telling us how we should be doing something.

There is obviously concrete and concrete. Some obviously age better than others. - Flash

"Me" apparently has a handle on how much each person posting comments on this page pays in property taxes and feels it is necessary to enter rude comments regarding their qualifications or to preserve anything built prior to "Me" paying $2 million+ for their overpriced Eichler. What a pity! It is nobody's fault except your own for buying what the market can't sustain.
As for city building inspectors inspecting and determining that all is well, nothing to worry about...exactly what qualifications do they have to make such a determination?

> Since this was made of concrete, it was obviously not expected to last hundreds of years

Actually... the Romans built buildings, aqueducts, bridges, and ports with concrete 2,000 years ago. They even had underwater concrete. Many of these Roman concrete structures still exist and are in good condition. The Pantheon, which has the world's largest unreinforced concrete dome, can be visited in Rome.

Roman concrete was made with volcanic ash. They didn't use rebars (embedded steel rods). Modern concrete often includes sand, so it lasts perhaps 50 years.

The Berlin Wall was brittle and easily chipped (I was one of those people with a hammer at the Berlin Wall in 1989) because they used too much sand.

As I said above, there is obviously concrete and concrete. The Romans built excellent concrete. Obviously the ones who built this building did not and did not expect it to last as long as Roman architecture. If you want something to last, build it right the first time.

""Me" apparently has a handle on how much each person posting comments on this page pays in property taxes and feels it is necessary to enter rude comments regarding their qualifications or to preserve anything built prior to "Me" paying $2 million+ for their overpriced Eichler. "

Haha. There are no Eichlers in Old Palo Alto. We actually have an interesting diversity of homes, which is more interesting than a neighborhood of ossified sameness.

Since you live in our neighborhood ostensibly, you would know that. Or maybe you don't.

It's usually the old folks who want to "preserve" Palo Alto. And they're the ones that have been here 30+ years. You can do the math on how much folks who bought even 10+ later are subsidizing these people.

And this is not just a Palo Alto problem. This is a California problem. It's just more acute here.

Me seems to be singing one note: dislike of those who don't pay as much property tax as he/she, and using the word ossify in many strange and usually inappropriate ways. Haha