Town Square

Post a New Topic

School board approves Addison donation

Original post made on Mar 8, 2016

A plan to significantly renovate Addison Elementary School took a step forward Tuesday night with the Palo Alto school board unanimously accepting the first of what is expected to be several major donations made to fully fund the project.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, March 8, 2016, 11:22 PM

Comments (14)

14 people like this
Posted by Golden Rule
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 8, 2016 at 11:58 pm

"I feel like we're hammering people in a way that doesn't feel good. I need to see a policy that reflects our gratitude."

Oohhhh, the donor. I thought for a moment that someone on the board finally recognized how utterly unprofessional and evil the administration can be to families who aren't so influential. (Oh wait, that's hammering people in a way that doesn't feel good to just those people, sorry. Still waiting for the district folk to hear that OCR letter they wrote for its screaming hypocrisy.)

Good for Addison (very sincerely). Thanks to the donor. But this whole situation makes me cringe at the lack of reflection on why the bond did not pay for substantially renovating the campuses. The district planners openly ignored requests to consider things that increased construction costs unnecessarily. The implication was that there was plenty of money and we didn't need to care. Now we see that the money has been spent and so much of the district is still in bad shape, like Addison. (And the rich parent willing to do something when things are not good is going to have no sense of what is lacking elsewhere. That shouldn't be their problem, but then again, neither should improving Addison when we just had a $400 million facilities bond.)

i support our schools and will continue to give them plenty myself (not on that order, but) but I intend to take the exemptions I can as soonas Ihit 65. No good money after bad.

4 people like this
Posted by Agustín
a resident of Crescent Park
on Mar 9, 2016 at 11:38 am

Dauber and Townsend are right about creating a policy that makes donating to the district less of headache. There is so much red tape and bureaucracy not to mention the criticism and scrutiny that come with wanting to help our schools, that many donors avoid it altogether. There are a lot of resources in this community that will find their way to other initiatives that are less fraught with drama. Supporting our public schools should be easy. The board is on the right track and unless we find ways to access philanthropic/private dollars, parity amongst the schools will be a long way out.

3 people like this
Posted by Crescent Park Mom
a resident of Crescent Park
on Mar 9, 2016 at 12:03 pm

Good job on all fronts school board!

13 people like this
Posted by Longtime Resident
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 9, 2016 at 12:57 pm

Few things in life are free. There is likely to be some kind of payback, at some point in time.

One can normally "follow the money", in Palo Alto. But in this case, the public will never know. A lack of transparency to this degree is problematic.

Some one has to cash the check. Or will it be given via cash, dropped off in a parking garage, at an appointed time, for an insider to pick up?

8 people like this
Posted by JA3+
a resident of Crescent Park
on Mar 9, 2016 at 2:09 pm

Thank you, donor, very much. I sincerely appreciate your donation.

2 people like this
Posted by alas
a resident of Crescent Park
on Mar 9, 2016 at 9:01 pm

Thank-you, donor.

3 people like this
Posted by Duveneck Resident
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Mar 10, 2016 at 10:00 am

Thank you to donor for helping their entire Addison neighborhoods children. Thanks to the board for putting the children first and giving some love to Addison, one of the last schools which has not received much needed renovations. This will help free up money for renovations at other schools. I hope it will be easier for large donations in the future to other PA schools as well.

13 people like this
Posted by What a Shame
a resident of Community Center
on Mar 10, 2016 at 11:31 am

The whole "thank you" thing shocks me. Everyone seems to know that the donor is simply buying an upgraded school for her own kid's future use. That's it. If their kid went elsewhere - then forget it. There's no generosity involved - this is simply what it costs to upgrade the school your kid plans to use.

Shame on the board for just laying down its principles - parity, who cares? transparency - that's for suckers! - and the community for egging them on. What a shame.

6 people like this
Posted by PiE Donation Regrets
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 10, 2016 at 4:33 pm

This donor is extraordinarily generous. Anyone who gives to the schools gets a thumbs up. Addison clearly needs the upgrade.

Now my only regret is all the years I donated to PiE instead of donating directly to my children's schools (the way this donor has). I didn't know the PAUSD School Board would be so welcoming of site specific private donations. I bought the PiE "we're all in this together" marketing shpeel hook line and sinker - silly me. I wish I could ask PiE for a refund and redirect those many years of donations to my neighborhood schools. After all, under the Board's new "Proposed Gifts Policy", I would've been able to give up to $25,000 directly to my children's school principals. We don't have a lot of school years left in Palo Alto, but you can bet I'll be donating directly to my children's schools from here on out. Goodbye PiE.

4 people like this
Posted by ohlone parent
a resident of Greenmeadow
on Mar 10, 2016 at 4:43 pm

Starting next year, I won't be donating to PiE. I will be donating directly to my child's school.

Thanks donor, for setting the trend.

5 people like this
Posted by Palo Verde Parent
a resident of Palo Verde
on Mar 10, 2016 at 8:51 pm

I too will be donating directly to my child's school. It seems to me that PIE's days are numbered.

1 person likes this
Posted by Golden Rule
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 10, 2016 at 9:43 pm

The time to make a difference was when the district was planning ro spend the bond money. No one cared that the public input was one of the most laughable farces ever, no one listened to the very few people trying to get the public to care that we would get here, it was inevitable, the money gone and little to show for it. Tonight my around the dinner table everyone was literally trying to figure out how the district managed to spend the bulk of $400 million while accomplishing so little, or how they could have spent more than $200 M for what they actually did.

(Them who has the gold, make the rules...)

Like this comment
Posted by Parent
a resident of Greenmeadow
on Mar 10, 2016 at 10:19 pm

@Golden, you're mistaken. There's been a lot of building done, and since it good quality, designed to last many decades, and done in Silicon Valley while schools were occupied, it isn't cheap. Extensive work at both high schools (still ongoing), all 3 middle schools, and 3 elementary expansions, plus technology spending, and purchasing 525 San Antonio Rd. There's still $130M to be spent, so more than a third left. Maybe a dinner tomorrow, you can chew it over again.

Like this comment
Posted by policy update
a resident of Barron Park
on Oct 29, 2016 at 5:05 pm

AR 3290 Gifts, Grants, and Bequests

Web Link

"This policy has been back and forth between the Board and BPRC more than once. The language has been revised to be more encouraging and welcoming for donors. Also, the Board will be discussing two options for handling anonymous donations." These are:

Paragraph four currently reads:

"Superintendent shall ascertain the identity of the donor and inform the Board in confidence. This requirement for identifying an anonymous donor to the Superintendent and the Board may be waived by a vote of the Board in a public meeting."

Staff recommended replacing paragraph four with the following two paragraphs:

“While PAUSD encourages donors to share their names so they can be publicly recognized, the district realizes some donors prefer to remain anonymous and welcomes and honors these anonymous gifts. If a donor of a gift in excess of $50,000 prefers to remain anonymous, and the gift is made through a donor advised fund, which has a documented process for vetting the source of the donor’s funds, PAUSD will not seek to ascertain the identity of the donor.

If an individual wishes to make an anonymous donation from a personal account, the Superintendent shall identify the donor and alert the Board if a potential conflict of interest exists or there is another reason for potentially declining the gift. This requirement for the Superintendent to identify an anonymous donor may be waived by a vote of the Board in a public meeting.”

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Get important election coverage sent straight to your inbox daily.

Former Flea St. Cafe chef starts meal delivery service
By Elena Kadvany | 1 comment | 6,907 views

10 ways to reduce your dog's "pawprint"
By Sherry Listgarten | 9 comments | 4,482 views

Why can't high schoolers write?
By Jessica Zang | 13 comments | 2,748 views

"Plant an Expectation, Reap a Disappointment"
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,899 views

'Ignoring what's wrong has never made anything right'
By Diana Diamond | 4 comments | 1,273 views


Who is your local hero?

Whether they're grocery shopping for a neighbor or volunteering for a nonprofit, you can spread the joy and support our journalism efforts by giving them a shout-out.

Learn More