Town Square

Post a New Topic

Chevy Suburban flips on Palo Alto on-ramp

Original post made on Mar 31, 2014

The driver of a black Chevrolet Suburban lost control of his vehicle in Palo Alto and flipped the car onto its roof on Monday morning.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Monday, March 31, 2014, 1:06 PM

Comments (15)

Posted by safety first
a resident of Midtown
on Mar 31, 2014 at 1:50 pm

Just because your truck has traction control does not mean you can speed through slick turns. Use common sense and slow down in the rain! I'm glad they were not hurt. I hope everyone learns a lesson from crash. I'm also glad that the newspaper is not calling the crash an "accident".

Posted by Resident
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 31, 2014 at 1:57 pm

Definition of an accident is that it wasn't meant to happen. Definition of a crash is hitting something.

I am assuming that the driver didn't meant to do this so it was definitely accidental. If he hit the guardrail then it was a crash against the guardrail, if he rolled and hit nothing then how could it be called crashing?

A collision also involves hitting something.

I would call this an accident as there was no intention on behalf of the driver in rolling over even if he was driving too fast.

I suppose the correct call would be to call it a roll over, but to some people that might sound deliberate. So perhaps accidental roll over?

Posted by neighbor
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 31, 2014 at 2:06 pm

What if this huge vehicle had skidded into another a smaller Better slow down.

Posted by safety first
a resident of Midtown
on Mar 31, 2014 at 2:26 pm

I disagree with @Resident. If a collision is easily preventable through safe common-sense driving, then it is no accident. Reckless driving is not an accident just like drunk driving is not an accident.

Posted by Deserving
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 31, 2014 at 2:43 pm

Just think how upset people would be if cyclists were causing this much chaos on the roads. Why I saw one run a stop sign just this morning...causing issue to nobody, but that's not the point. He IRRITATED me!!!

Posted by Callie
a resident of Palo Alto High School
on Mar 31, 2014 at 3:05 pm

Using 4WD in Palo Alto is completely unnecessary; he must have been driving too fast. We moved from snow country so I drove a Suburban here for 5 years. People always yielded to me, assuming I was a lunatic, power-hungry driver. This driver just fed into the stereotype - shame on him.

Posted by ndtown
a resident of Downtown North
on Mar 31, 2014 at 3:56 pm

Too fast for the conditions...
It's not the 4wheel 's fault.

Posted by Hulkamania
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Mar 31, 2014 at 7:04 pm

The southbound on-ramp to 101 at Embarcadero has a huge climb. The driver should have had his snow chains mounted on his tires for better traction.

Posted by Anonymous
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 31, 2014 at 7:23 pm

For some reason drivers think 4WD is some kind of miracle which allows them to drive carelessly. The same laws of physics apply to 4WD SUV's as any other vehicle.

Posted by CrescentParkAnon.
a resident of Crescent Park
on Mar 31, 2014 at 7:51 pm

So ... uh, who pays for any damages in this case. It's clearly the negligence for the driver ... shouldn't his insurance company cover anything like rebuilding the guardrail?

And speaking of guardrails, I keep noticing that the Alma overpass at Embarcadero was run into and is missing a big chunk? Is that ever going to be fixed ... and if so, when ... and how?

Posted by Jean
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Apr 1, 2014 at 8:12 am

Another Palo Alto resident in a rush to get their Starbucks. See? This is what happens....

Posted by Crescent Park Dad
a resident of Crescent Park
on Apr 1, 2014 at 11:17 am

Agree w/ previous posters on this thread: 4WD or AWD will not prevent sliding or hydroplaning in the rain and on wet surfaces. The driver is totally clueless on that aspect of driving.

Outside of not paying attention to where he was going (he said he was trying to switch to 4WD - perhaps not looking at the road) and given the results of his foray into the weeds, excessive speed for the weather and wet road surface had to be the problem.

@ Jean: What proof do you have that the driver is a PA resident? Whenever an accident happens on a PA street, why is it that everyone assumes that it was PA resident? Newsflash - PA does not have a monopoly on bad drivers, bad bicyclists, bad pedestrians, over-sized SUVs, clueless Prius drivers, etc., etc.

Posted by Hmmm
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Apr 1, 2014 at 1:05 pm

Hmmm is a registered user.

Was the road wet when this happened? I barely recall yesterday, but I didn't think it started to rain til later.

CPD - yeah, it's not like there are other bad drivers that exit and enter the freeway via PA who live elsewhere!

When I had an AWD vehicle, I don't recall using it in rainy weather on pavement. Did I miss a fabulous opportunity to make driving more fun?

Posted by Wondering?
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Apr 1, 2014 at 3:14 pm

> CHP Redwood City spokesman Officer Moises Escoto said that speed
> was likely a factor.

Speed is always a factor. Just read the accident reports, and that fact comes through in spades.

> remain anonymous ..

Why should anyone be allowed to remain anonymous who has endangered the lives of other motorists, and destroyed public property.

Posted by safety first
a resident of Midtown
on Apr 1, 2014 at 5:13 pm

@Wondering - they are allowed to remain anonymous because the cops are too wimpy to charge them for reckless driving and property damage. If the cops did not personally witness an obvious infraction, they generally only cite or charge for DUI or vehicular manslaughter. Anything less is the driver goes free (perhaps with an insurance rate hike).

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Palo Alto Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

Holiday Fun in San Francisco- Take the Walking Tour for An Evening of Sparkle!
By Laura Stec | 8 comments | 3,421 views

Boichik Bagels is opening its newest – and largest – location in Santa Clara this week
By The Peninsula Foodist | 0 comments | 2,330 views

I Do I Don't: How to build a better marriage Ch. 1, page 1
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,415 views


Palo Alto Weekly Holiday Fund

For the last 30 years, the Palo Alto Weekly Holiday Fund has given away almost $10 million to local nonprofits serving children and families. 100% of the funds go directly to local programs. It’s a great way to ensure your charitable donations are working at home.