Town Square

Post a New Topic

A lack of making plays proved the difference in loss to USC

Original post made on Nov 19, 2013

==BI Stanford football notebook==
During the chaos that ensued after Saturday night after USC's 20-17 upset win against fourth-ranked Stanford at the sold-out Los Angeles Coliseum, Stanford head coach David Shaw didn't have a chance to shake hands with Trojans' interim head coach Ed Orgeron. Shaw tried, but couldn't find him, as many of the 93,607 fans stormed the field. He'll follow up by phone.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Monday, November 18, 2013, 9:09 AM

Comments (5)

Like this comment
Posted by Darren
a resident of Los Altos
on Nov 19, 2013 at 11:50 am

Coach Shaw is a class act. Tough loss, but handled with grace.

Like this comment
Posted by BleedCardinal
a resident of Midtown
on Nov 19, 2013 at 12:22 pm

Coach Shaw - love him - but he need to take more responsibility for these bad losses. He could start by realizing that he is the HEAD Coach - he is the star, he is point man, he is the reason why recruits will come to play at Stanford -- but he has got to trust his staff. Let your offensive coordinator call the plays the whole 100 yards, not 80. Stop taking over the play calling in the red zone. As someone pointed out in another post, Saban ain't pacing around with a playbook is he?

Like this comment
Posted by Miguel
a resident of another community
on Nov 19, 2013 at 2:20 pm

I am loathe to criticize a football coach, as my only tie to college football has been as a fan. But my uneasy feeling that the late-game play calling in Stanford's two losses was atrocious, has been echoed by some media sport pundits. Don't understand why the coaches seem to lose faith in the power run game late in the game. Had the Utah game been put on Gaffney's feet, instead of Hogan's hands, in the closing moments, a different result was likely. Similarly, why was Hogan throwing the ball with about 3 minutes left when the power run game could have advanced the ball, or at least run out the clock for overtime ?

Like this comment
Posted by macbaldy
a resident of Stanford
on Nov 19, 2013 at 2:45 pm

This USC game was a team loss, players and coaches, particularly on the offensive side. The Utah loss was more about slumps on both sides of the ball. Against USC, Hogan shouldn't have been allowed to try to carry the team in the 4th Quarter; he'd actually been quite good for the first 3 quarters but the ground game with Gaffney was solid. There's something missing to a "run-first" offense that doesn't believe in a "run-last" effort, especially when the run game is working. Surmise: "run-first" has merely been a gamesmanship facade. Further surmise: Sometimes, going away from a strength is the best way to expose weaknesses. Coach Shaw overthinks his gamesmanship.

Like this comment
Posted by Ben Factor
a resident of another community
on Nov 20, 2013 at 12:45 am

USC follower here. I saw the above comments that Shaw abandoned the run, so I looked at the play by play. The run stopped working, so Shaw went to the pass. That last Stanford drive followed a three and out--three failed rushing plays. USC was keying against the run, as common sense would dictate when Stanford needed to score. Hogan had to get it done, and he started OK, then got pressured and made a mistake, and didn't throw it far enough out of bounds.

USC couldn't run AT ALL in the second half. USC stupidly ignored Stanford's adjustments, and kept trying to repeat the first half, instead of more 1st down play-action passes and/or assorted other plays against its own first-half tendencies. Kessler was so unnerved by the failed run game and couple of hard rushes that he missed a bunch of passes even when he had time. Plus he fumbled on one of those hard rushes.

I give credit to Shaw for changing gears faster than USC did, when he saw that the run game was over for the day.

Both teams have top 10 opponent-adjusted defenses on The strength of both defenses is the front seven. Neither offense was going to be able to push ahead with same old same old, i.e., running the football. The respective defenses weren't having it and the outcome was handed over to the respective QBs.

Hogan had to step up and didn't. Throw it out of bounds on 2nd down, and Stanford would likely have won.

Kessler didn't step up either, until the very last possession. But then he did. And that was the game.

If Pat Haden, USC's athletic director were granted one wish, he would hire David Shaw. USC is actually a top 25 university, but it's not Stanford. USC admits a lot of athletes that Stanford won't admit. It recruited about 55 4-star and 5-star players in the last five years; Stanford recruited about 25. Imagine Shaw coaching USC's skill players and overall speed. If USC had Shaw, it would be all over for the rest of the Pac-12.

Count your blessings; in Shaw, you have first prize.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Fu Lam Mum shutters temporarily in Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 5 comments | 3,334 views

How Does Silicon Valley’s Culture Affect Your Marriage?
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 748 views


Best Of Palo Alto ballot is here

It's time to decide what local business is worthy of the title "Best Of Palo Alto" — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 29th. Stay tuned for the results in the July 21st issue of the Palo Alto Weekly.