Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Apr 27, 2013
Thanks for the review.
However, it seems to be incorrect on a point of history. The review states that Auguste's younger son Claude was "aged up to puberty" but only 1 and a half at the time.
there were two Claude's in the family, and Auguste's son Claude was born in 1901. Hence, he would be 14 in 1915. The other Claude was the nephew of the other, and younger, "Claude" in the family.
I mention this because the reviewer seems to think that having the younger brother "dilutes" the story.
I really loved the movie and it is now my new favorite.
This time we're not lying. HONEST! No, really!
By Douglas Moran | 12 comments | 973 views
Couples: When Wrong Admit It; When Right; Shut Up
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 859 views
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 607 views
Home & Real Estate
Send News Tips
Express / Weekend Express
Circulation & Delivery
Mountain View Voice
© 2018 Palo Alto Online
All rights reserved.