Town Square

Post a New Topic

SAP executive pleads 'not guilty' in LEGO-theft case

Original post made on Aug 14, 2012

A Palo Alto software company executive accused of switching barcodes on the tags of LEGO toys rejected a plea bargain and pleaded not guilty in Santa Clara County Superior Court in Palo Alto on Tuesday morning, Aug. 14.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, August 14, 2012, 1:04 PM

Comments (16)

Like this comment
Posted by Jake
a resident of another community
on Aug 14, 2012 at 7:25 pm

Great excuse! I hope he gets convicted and he gets max sentance allowed for actualy attempting to excuse his crimes. Another rich educated crook who thinks they are above the law and his high priced lawyer will get him a slap on the wrist.
Seems he has too much money and ego and not enough integrity to step up and take responsibility for his actions.

Like this comment
Posted by Emerson
a resident of another community
on Aug 14, 2012 at 7:37 pm

Anyone else think the mug shot looks just like the creep on the TV show Lost? Obviously guilty. Can I volunteer for jury duty?

Like this comment
Posted by musical
a resident of Palo Verde
on Aug 14, 2012 at 7:43 pm

It's called self-delusion. And it has a rich history.

Like this comment
Posted by Outside Observer
a resident of another community
on Aug 14, 2012 at 8:36 pm

So, his lawyer convinced him to not take the plea bargain.

The lawyer will come out of this with 6 figures, and this idiot will will get far worse than the plea bargain.

I suppose you could justify this on "Darwinism", but aren't lawyers suppose to look out for the best interests of their clients? At least that is what they taught me in school.....

Like this comment
Posted by Anon.
a resident of Crescent Park
on Aug 14, 2012 at 10:13 pm

It's a little scary how the way we have set up the incentives for success in America we seem to preferentially reward psychopaths and criminals, and then they rise to the top and set the tone for the whole country ... and no one had to fire a shot from a hostile country either ... kind of sad.

Like this comment
Posted by Outside Observer
a resident of another community
on Aug 14, 2012 at 10:38 pm


Taking Shakespeare's advise from Henry VI would go a long way toward removing the psychopaths and criminals from society ;)

Like this comment
Posted by moi
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Aug 15, 2012 at 7:16 am

Apparently Langenbach received a "gentleman's C" in his logic class at college.

Like this comment
Posted by Overzealous Prosectors
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Aug 15, 2012 at 7:21 am

How enlightening to hear the "Let's give him a fair trial and then hang him" crowd sound off on this story. It is possible, of course, that the prosecutors are right and this mass of charges is justified. It's also possible that this gentleman is guilty of a less serious crime that deserves a lesser punishment. He might even be "guilty" only of making a mistake, as he claims.

What is true in our system is that he is innocent until proven guilty, that he deserves a fair hearing, and that nothing the prosecutors say has been tested in court.

If any of these commenters is called for jury duty in this case, I hope they will be educated by the court on the responsibilities of a "jury of his peers."

Like this comment
Posted by Cid Young
a resident of another community
on Aug 15, 2012 at 10:22 am

"He is probably sick."
That's what my mother told me when a friend got caught taking stuff at Woolworths in the 1950's. I was little, and that was her explanation at the time.

Like this comment
Posted by MemberName
a resident of Midtown
on Aug 15, 2012 at 10:29 am

Yes...I would not be what this "gentleman", as you refer to him, would want on his jury. Most certainly! As I see the facts that PA Online has provided, on this date and on the previous PA Online reporting of this 'gentleman', and at that time, readers were able to view the eBay account as it was showing all the active ebay auctions. I'll try to find the link to the original article and post it here, later. He was selling only 'rare' or hard to find LEGO sets. What is this 'gentleman' with the title of VP doing selling LEGO items he has been seen on TARGET footage switching barcodes?

Innocent Gentleman<?

Like this comment
Posted by Karen
a resident of Barron Park
on Aug 15, 2012 at 11:50 am

Hmmmm... if "he switched the barcodes out of curiosity, to see if it really worked" then why didn't he check the receipt when he left the store to see if it worked??!! Surely that would have been utmost on his mind at the time!

Like this comment
Posted by Gethin
a resident of Midtown
on Aug 15, 2012 at 12:18 pm

Although innocent until proven otherwise based on the police story and his pitiful excuses I can't see any other result than a guilty verdict. By refusing a plea he is potentially making it worse for himself and wasting our money and time in the process.

Like this comment
Posted by Paul Losch
a resident of Community Center
on Aug 15, 2012 at 1:49 pm

If I understand the facts from this report, there is something pathological about this guy's behavior.

A VP st SAP? Stealing LEGOS from retailers by chnaging the bsrcodes? Come on, Give me a break

The Oracle people are likely dancing on the floors of Redwood Shores about this lack of integity, judgement and behavor in a senior executve from its main competitor

Like this comment
Posted by dave
a resident of Downtown North
on Aug 15, 2012 at 2:07 pm

Overzealous Prosectors [sic] resident of D/St Francis neighborhood ..."only guilty of making a mistake"??? It seems he made quite a few "mistakes" if the evidence of multiple bar codes and unopened sets of Legos are any criteria.

And he was curious to see if it (switching bar codes) worked? So he tried again and again because he was still curious? The man is delusional as a poster said above.

Like this comment
Posted by Overzealous Prosectors
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Aug 15, 2012 at 4:52 pm

By all means, let's try this case in the media, right here, right now. The prosectors are trying to do just that, which, by the way, will make it much harder to empanel an unbiased jury, if this case does go to trial. Evidence? Until it's tested in court, we have no evidence, only the say so of the police and prosecutors. And we've only heard the prosecutor's version of the gentleman's--yes, gentleman's--story.

I'm glad this individual is making use of his right to a fair trial. It may be that the prosecutors will take another look at the charges and reduce them to be in line with the actual amount of the alleged theft, rather than use a string of assumptions to maximize the charges beyond what the evidence will bear. But we don't know, any more than we can easily figure out this gentleman's mental state, Paul Losch. Much as I like your blogs, I'm not sure you are wise to do psychological analysis based on news reports.

Like this comment
Posted by Hmmm
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Aug 15, 2012 at 10:31 pm

He is pathetic.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Food Party! 420
By Laura Stec | 10 comments | 2,343 views

What Are Your Gifts that Must Be Shared?
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,288 views


Best Of Palo Alto ballot is here

It's time to decide what local business is worthy of the title "Best Of Palo Alto" — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 29th. Stay tuned for the results in the July 21st issue of the Palo Alto Weekly.