Town Square

Post a New Topic

Panel to advise on Cubberley gets going

Original post made on Apr 24, 2012

Five community leaders – from the Palo Alto City Council and two from the Board of Education – will set the tone for upcoming community discussions on the future of Cubberley Community Center.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, April 24, 2012, 9:52 AM

Comments (3)

Like this comment
Posted by senor blogger
a resident of Palo Verde
on Apr 24, 2012 at 12:46 pm

It's a no Brainer.

The City agreed years ago to give the School District approx $7 million a year To preserve the site for a future school need.
Now the school district needs a future school site.

So the city should feel free to curtain the payments and put that Money toward maintaining the infrastructure for the rest of the City.
That amount would also be enough to fund Certificates of Participation for a new Public Safety Building, as the Blue Ribbon Infrastructure Commission recommended.

Like I said---- It's a No-Brainer...

Like this comment
Posted by PA Neighbor
a resident of South of Midtown
on Apr 25, 2012 at 9:36 am

Blogger: There is one big problem with your analysis. The School District has said they do not want Cubberley back to be used as a school for another five to ten years. Whose going to pay for the site until they need it as a school facility?

Like this comment
Posted by No Sir
a resident of another community
on Apr 25, 2012 at 11:24 am

$7M annual savings would possibly cover the study, architect, design phases of a new public safety building. Construction phase would most likely triple in cost. How about taking the $7M and put it towards the Hetch Hetchy project instead of raising water rates to cover the City inability to maintain infrastructure? Besides, the school district does not pay for maintenance done at cubberley. The City does which is an additional cost savings.

"For most citizens, there's not a clear differentiation in their minds about who's doing what," Mitchell said. "They want us to work together for the common best interests of residents rather than, 'This is in the best interest of the school district' or 'This is in the best interest of the city.'" And that folks says it all about city management. What is best for ME instead of employees, education, and community. Council is being so misguided by city staff.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Why contentious local politics? More examples from ADU at Council
By Douglas Moran | 49 comments | 2,151 views

Food Party! 420
By Laura Stec | 5 comments | 1,537 views

What Are Your Gifts that Must Be Shared?
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 629 views


Best Of Palo Alto ballot is here

It's time to decide what local business is worthy of the title "Best Of Palo Alto" — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 29th. Stay tuned for the results in the July 21st issue of the Palo Alto Weekly.