Town Square

Post a New Topic

Cubberley, retiree costs on council agenda tonight

Original post made on Apr 16, 2012

The Palo Alto City Council tonight will discuss the uncertain fate of Cubberley Community Center, appoint members to openings on three city commissions and consider revising assumptions in projections of health care obligations for city retirees.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Monday, April 16, 2012, 9:53 AM

Comments (5)

Like this comment
Posted by what is wrong with this picture?
a resident of Crescent Park
on Apr 16, 2012 at 11:57 am

Number of employees 923
Average employee Age 44.7
Number of retirees 860
Average Retirement Age 55.5

Like this comment
Posted by PA Neighbor
a resident of South of Midtown
on Apr 16, 2012 at 12:23 pm

"....the school district has said it may need to reclaim part or all of Cubberley, but probably not for another five or six years."

If the School District does not want Cubberley back for five or six years, the question is: "Will the City lease the School District's 27 acres of Cubberley for another five or six years at $6.1 Million per year?

Another five year lease agreement between the City and the School District should be the subject of negotiations between the City's legal department and the PAUSD.

Do we really need three Citywide Committees to decide Cubberley's future when the School District has already said what they want?

Like this comment
Posted by george
a resident of Charleston Gardens
on Apr 16, 2012 at 3:34 pm

The City Manager has recommended "that the primary advisor to the council should be a five-member committee made up of three council members and two school board members".

In such case, what is the purpose of an unwieldy 21 member advisory committee? It will go the way of all Blue Ribbon ad hoc committees (Library and Infrastructure are recent examples) where many dedicated citizens put in thousand of hours to find their efforts are ignored or at best, slighted.

When the dust all settles, the PAUSD board will make the final decision, unless the City Council says, "Enough. We can't wait five years and pay you $6M/year we can't afford". Unlikely happening.

Like this comment
Posted by Resident
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Apr 16, 2012 at 4:33 pm

I agree with George about this committee.

The school board has had committees made up of various groups in the past and then totally ignored their input. The AAAG (boundaries) and high school task force are two that come to mind and I think the math task force is another example.

Like this comment
Posted by observation
a resident of Midtown
on Apr 16, 2012 at 9:12 pm

"the value of existing community uses and access to Cubberley."

I hope people remember that the new community center at Mitchell Park will be opening soon, many uses can move there.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Why contentious local politics? More examples from ADU at Council
By Douglas Moran | 49 comments | 1,962 views

Food Party! 420
By Laura Stec | 5 comments | 1,241 views

What Are Your Gifts that Must Be Shared?
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 428 views


Best Of Palo Alto ballot is here

It's time to decide what local business is worthy of the title "Best Of Palo Alto" — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 29th. Stay tuned for the results in the July 21st issue of the Palo Alto Weekly.