Town Square

Post a New Topic

Big board, staff exodus from Pacific Art League

Original post made on Jan 11, 2008

In a massive leadership change, 10 of 14 board members resigned this week at the conflict-torn Pacific Art League in downtown Palo Alto -- following resignations in December of all but one staff member.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, January 11, 2008, 6:28 PM

Comments (9)

Like this comment
Posted by Howard
a resident of Crescent Park
on Jan 11, 2008 at 9:26 pm

What a bunch of clowns.

Like this comment
Posted by Peter
a resident of another community
on Jan 12, 2008 at 8:54 am

Sounds as if the members want a cloistered atmosphere, with no competiton from "outsiders." A sure way to become insular and lose appeal to the art-buying public, and a way to reduce sales from the gallery and the gift shop. Outreach helps give the wider art-buying public greater exposure to the member-artists' work and familiarized the general public with the work of the league. It also helps broaden the base of potential donors for a fund-raising effort.

Sounds like a recipe for nice cozy "our club" feelings and commercial and fund-raising disaster. The league will need all the luck they can get.

I am not a member of the league, nor have I taken classes there.

Like this comment
Posted by Kate
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Jan 12, 2008 at 1:19 pm

Why is this 'event' listed under Town Square's "Crime and Incidents"? It may be a civic 'crime' to some, a domestic dispute to others, but it's pure Palo Alto 'theater'.

Like this comment
Posted by art critic
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jan 12, 2008 at 2:04 pm

> but it's pure Palo Alto 'theater'

Link this article to the thread on "Dog Park Snobs", and you have some excellent theater at the best possible price.

It's no reason so many people are saying that this is not a good place to live anymore.

Like this comment
Posted by full disclosure
a resident of Barron Park
on Jan 12, 2008 at 4:04 pm

When the Weekly writes about Jim Baer, it should disclose to the reader that the Weekly is partners with Baer in developing a three-story building at 450 Cambridge Avenue. Failure to disclose this fact is a major breach of journalism ethics.

Like this comment
Posted by Art League Lover
a resident of Menlo Park
on Jan 16, 2008 at 8:32 pm

Actually the fact is that Donnasue Jacobi, Walter Smith and the rest of their ilk so continually harassed the staff that all but 1 quit.

Wow! What a way to care about your art league and get off on the right foot.

Fact 2, the final vote actually went FOR the upgrade of the building. But the board decided to put it on hold and also left because they attacked by liable statements.

Fact 3, around 8 people were able to bring down a 600 member organization and stop their vote.

Good luck, because the art league is going down fast.

Like this comment
Posted by Art Afficianado
a resident of Portola Valley
on Jan 18, 2008 at 3:52 pm

And then there were none. Turns out the last holdout from the staff, Executive Director Stephanie Demos, is out on medical leave once again from overwhelming stress of this group. She's no wimp and has been around the block professionally, so it's hard to imagine the level of harassment that has been heaped upon her to send her to the hospital twice in less than two months. Personally, I think it was a brave and noble, but clearly misguided decision for her to return at all. What a bunch of clowns, indeed. Unfortunately under the greasepaint there appears to be quite a hunger for making mischief and bringing down the leadership. Isn't she the second ED toppled by Walter Smith and compnay?

Like this comment
Posted by Bob
a resident of another community
on Jan 25, 2008 at 11:19 am

If the old board was doing such a magnificent job, why were the members so easily swayed to vote them out. It apperars they do not know how to "OUTREACH" to their own members.

Like this comment
Posted by ART
a resident of Green Acres
on Feb 14, 2008 at 9:49 am

Dear Bob,

No one voted out the old board. The ballots were never tallied because of the outcry of the same small group that loudly protested every move they made. Just because they made the most noise and spread the most disinformation does not mean these few dissidents were right. The former board, and most of the staff, determined that they could not accomplish any of their goals under the constant beligerence of a group that had much to criticize but little to contribute. Don't forget that board members are volunteers. Perhaps the old board did not successfully outreach to their own members, but don't forget they were under siege by a group of swift boaters.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Fu Lam Mum shutters temporarily in Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 6 comments | 3,198 views

How Does Silicon Valley’s Culture Affect Your Marriage?
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 651 views


Best Of Palo Alto ballot is here

It's time to decide what local business is worthy of the title "Best Of Palo Alto" — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 29th. Stay tuned for the results in the July 21st issue of the Palo Alto Weekly.