More revisions had to be made in the 11th hour, after residents outraged about a proposed development on Maybell Avenue learned that city planners included the yet-unapproved development in the Housing Element inventory.
So when the City Council unanimously voted Monday night to officially adopt the housing vision, it did so with a sigh of relief rather than a cheer of celebration. Councilwoman Liz Kniss said she found the process "frustrating" and said the city will not be able to meet the regional predictions for needed housing "without actually going high-rise."
"It is for me just maddening that a state agency can absolutely impose on us and punish us in the end for not attaining the numbers that someone has come up with," Kniss said.
Councilwoman Karen Holman sounded a similar note and said the process is "anything but local control."
"This is definitely top-down and not how I think good governance happens at local levels," Holman said.
Councilman Greg Schmid said "congratulations are in order." He then pointed out that the city is now in the seventh year of the plan's eight-year period and called the process of adopting the Housing Element a "long, hard slog," a phrase famously used by Donald Rumsfeld to describe the war in Iraq.
Such was the adoption ceremony for Palo Alto's chief policy document for housing, one that lays out the city's vision with the statement, "Our housing and neighborhoods shall enhance the livable human environment for all residents, be accessible to civic and community services and sustain our natural resources."
The document includes incentives to encourage affordable housing; focus developments at sites near transit centers; encourage more mixed-use buildings featuring apartments; and encourage development at sites currently underutilized. The Planning and Transportation Commission, which helped midwife the document through the long and difficult process, lauded it as "excellent" and "impressive" at a review last month before approving it by a 6-0 vote.
The council was far less enthused on Monday night, having just experienced first-hand the challenge of building affordable housing in Palo Alto, where property values are among the highest in the nation. The vote on the Housing Element came just minutes after the council approved a zone change to enable a development for 567 Maybell Ave., which includes a 60-unit building for low-income seniors and 12 single-family homes.
Vice Mayor Nancy Shepherd pointed to the Maybell vote to illustrate the complexity of zoning for additional housing in Palo Alto and local resistance to housing mandates. She suggested that the council's Regional Housing Mandate Committee further consider the city's response to mandates and ways to communicate to residents the city's strategy for housing.
"I think this community would like to have a little more of a destiny with its own vision of how we want to incorporate our zoning and build for what we want," Shepherd said.
Councilman Larry Klein, a longtime critic of the regional housing-allocation process, lamented on Monday what he felt was a lot of wasted effort involved in putting the housing inventory together to meet regional projections. He said he felt sorry for whoever in Sacramento will be reviewing these documents for each California city and called California's housing program "misguided." Klein said he had considered not voting in protest against the process but ultimately decided to go along with his colleagues.
"I will reluctantly vote for it because I don't think we have any choice," Klein said just before the vote.
The city's triumph, such as it is, isn't expected to last long. With the planning period almost over, Palo Alto is facing a deadline of December 2014 to have its next Housing Element completed.
TALK ABOUT IT
A discussion of this article is happening on Town Square, the online forum at PaloAltoOnline.com/square. Share your opinion on this and other local news.
This story contains 753 words.
Stories older than 90 days are available only to subscribing members. Please help sustain quality local journalism by becoming a subscribing member today.
If you are already a subscriber, please log in so you can continue to enjoy unlimited access to stories and archives. Subscriptions start at $5 per month and may be cancelled at any time.