Palo Alto looks to renew, change Cubberley lease | May 17, 2013 | Palo Alto Weekly | Palo Alto Online |

Palo Alto Weekly

News - May 17, 2013

Palo Alto looks to renew, change Cubberley lease

City Council set to begin negotiations with school district on new agreement for 35-acre campus

by Gennady Sheyner

The future of Cubberley Community Center may still be in flux, but Palo Alto officials sent a strong signal on Monday night that they would like to maintain the city's investment in the eclectic but dilapidated complex on the south side of the city.

During a broad and wide-ranging discussion Monday night, May 13, the City Council voted 7-1, with Greg Schmid dissenting and Karen Holman absent, to publicly declare the city's interest in renewing the city's lease with the school board for the busy 35-acre center at 4000 Middlefield Road. But the council also made it clear at Monday's public hearing that the new agreement will have to be very different from the one that the city signed in 1988 and that is set to expire at the end of next year.

Though the council was hesitant about committing to any specific changes (it plans to consider these changes at a closed session next week), several members said they would like to eliminate the covenant not to develop that is included in the current existing lease. The council also voiced general support for a recommendation from a citizen-advisory committee to perform a community-needs assessment as part of the process for determining Cubberley's future.

The public hearing on Monday was the latest chapter in the city's long and complex discussion over Cubberley, which is currently co-owned by the city and the school district. The city currently owns 8 acres on the northeast side of the campus and leases the rest of Cubberley from the Palo Alto Unified School District under an agreement set to expire in 2014. The contract costs the city about $7 million a year, in addition to maintenance costs.

The fate of Cubberley has been a source of anxiety for the many patrons of the campus, including residents who use its playing fields, artists who rent space at its studios and parents whose children use its day-care facilities. In March, a citizens committee composed of neighborhood leaders and former council and school board members released a report urging the city to renew the lease for 10 years and to pursue with the school district a master plan for "joint use" of the community center. The new lease, the Cubberley Community Advisory Committee recommended, should include a commitment to "make concrete plans for long term sharing of the site."

Council members all agreed that the city should maintain its interest in Cubberley and pursue a new lease. But with a closed session on the topic scheduled for next week, some were hesitant to show their hand too much. Councilman Larry Klein urged his colleagues not to be too rigid about staking out a position on Cubberley before the closed session and argued that doing so would tie the hands of City Manager James Keene and the city's negotiators. And Vice Mayor Nancy Shepherd and Councilwoman Liz Kniss both stressed that they should not be held too strictly to what they're saying publicly before the closed-door negotiations.

But even despite these precautions, the council voted to support Klein's motion to express the council's support for renewing and modifying the lease. Members also generally agreed that they should consider a needs assessment, as urged by community members, though they stopped short of voting on this topic. Instead, they directed the council's Policy and Services Committee to explore this recommendation further.

Councilwoman Gail Price, a former member of the school board, said that Cubberley offers the council and the school board a great opportunity to collaborate.

"We have a tremendous opportunity here to show how well we can work together — the school district, the City of Palo Alto and community members — to come up with innovative and creative and noteworthy resolutions," Price said.

Price also argued that the concept of a "joint use design" should be further refined before any commitments are made. Kniss and Shepherd both agreed.

"The devil is always in the details and these are devilish details," Kniss said.

Staff Writer Gennady Sheyner can be emailed at


Like this comment
Posted by Wayne Martin
a resident of Fairmeadow
on May 14, 2013 at 9:33 am

One change I would like to see is the City’s managing the finances of the Cubberley Center in a completely transparent fashion, and on a P&L (Profit & Loss) basis.

Currently, the finances of the Center are buried in the budget, or have to be requested via Public Information Requests. The City should change course and provide the residents, and the PAU ratepayers, a fully disclosed picture of the Center’s finances.

Like this comment
Posted by Dean
a resident of Midtown
on May 14, 2013 at 11:35 am

With all the personalities on CC, I wonder if any actually attended Cubberley as many of us did. Some us us, Palo Alto ex-pats, wonder how deep are the roots of the current crop of city officials.

Can anyone inform me if any have bee around long enough (pre 1978) to have attended Cubberley?

Like this comment
Posted by just rename us Casas Altas
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on May 14, 2013 at 12:54 pm

I know, let's rezone Cubberly to make it a high density development! We could put baby seals or low-income seniors there, no one could argue with that! And as we know from other projects, seniors don't eat, go anywhere, or need any services! Four, five stories high! HUNDREDS of units!! Congestion to eliminate congestion! Who cares about quality of life? We'd never have to worry about satisfying ABAG again!

And as we all know, satisfying ABAG is the City's only priority.

(Note: I was joking in the first paragraph above.)

Like this comment
Posted by Ree
a resident of Barron Park
on May 14, 2013 at 1:55 pm

For those of us who go there to use the Gyms (Cardiac Therapy Foundation or Foothill's Rehab Center, or other classes, I am wondering who is responsible for maintaining the safety of the property? The bathrooms are a mess, the water fountains are in such terrible disrepair that the "Health Department" should be taking a look at them. Is the problem, one of "it's not my part of the ownership that takes care of maintaining the buildings, etc.?

Like this comment
Posted by Crescent Park Dad
a resident of Crescent Park
on May 15, 2013 at 11:39 am

If joint use of the property is pursued, it will be interesting to know how that will work. Many of those who use Cubberly right now may not recognize that all PAUSD schools place a premium on security during the school day. In other words, school property (including fields, gyms, pools, etc.) is off-limits to non-students/staff.

Unless they set up a compartmentalized campus/comm-center, it seems doubtful that PAUSD will want to share the property during the school day.

Like this comment
Posted by Progressive?
a resident of another community
on May 18, 2013 at 2:02 pm

The innovative City of Palo Alto now has more union employee grievances than any other city in the Bay area! To be proud!

Many Managers have taken to harassing employees, "encouraging retirement", and blatant nepotism of hiring their children as "volunteers" and then training them on the job site for the next opening.

Managers are also not hiring for professional expertise, they are promoting their peers, for themselves for their pay and retirement advances from within in fear of "hiring people who know more than we do".

Several managers have taken to harassment and manufacturing lies about employees, so they can contract out positions. It is easier to show position cuts - than it is explaining millions on projects gone wrong.

Double dippers (retirees) are legally returning to 960 hour work if they retired before January 1, 2013. Palo Alto lists 50+ of these employees.

In the City of Palo Alto the "News Media" has taken advantage of the national war on civic employees by publishing news releases from management.

Employee working conditions, and pay cuts are NOT portrayed or investigated in the news media. Four years now of bashing employees wage and benefits...? There is no "furlough" just pay cuts so you work same hours, for far less pay AND continue to be bashed in the media

The next time there is a major weather crisis - wait to see what electric lineman status and SCADA employee staffing looks like.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields


Registration now open

Sign up for the 33rd annual Palo Alto Weekly Moonlight Run and Walk. This family-friendly event which benefits local nonprofits serving kids and families will take place on Friday, Oct. 6 at the Palo Alto Baylands.

Register Here