Palo Alto copes with spiking benefit costs | March 8, 2013 | Palo Alto Weekly | Palo Alto Online |

Palo Alto Weekly

News - March 8, 2013

Palo Alto copes with spiking benefit costs

Recent reforms help city withstand rising costs of pension, health care

by Gennady Sheyner

As pension and health care costs continue their dramatic rise, Palo Alto's budget officials can at least take solace in one fact — the city's employee expenses are holding steady despite the two troubling trends.

According to salary statistics that the city released last week, the city's payroll fell by 3 percent in 2012, largely as a result of a leaner workforce and a wave of retirements from some of the most senior employees. The city now has fewer workers and more flexibility when it comes to staffing, which resulted in a major drop in overtime spending. Furthermore, in a significant break from past practices, workers now pitch in toward their benefit costs.

The new numbers, along with financial forecasts that the City Council Finance Committee officials discussed Tuesday night, underscore the success of the labor reforms that Palo Alto has been aggressively pursuing since the economy tanked in 2008. Over the past three years, the city has negotiated new contracts with all of its labor unions that force employees to share the costs of their medical care, which has traditionally been paid for entirely by the city.

Workers also now pay the entire "employee share" of their pension contributions to the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS), a contribution that has previously been footed entirely by the city. The city's largest union, the Service Employees International Union, and its non-unionized group of managers and professionals have begun paying the full "employee share" last September. The city expects this move to save about $30.5 million over the next decade.

According to David Ramberg, assistant director of the Administrative Services Department, the slight decrease in the number of employees and the new contribution requirements were the major reasons for the city's overall compensation remaining largely unchanged at about $100 million. The city's contribution toward the employee share of worker pensions has dropped from $2.9 million in 2011 to $2 million in 2012, slightly softening the blow from the overall increase in pension payments. The employer share for workers' pensions has risen from $16.7 million in 2011 to $20.3 million in 2012, the new data shows.

The city also expects medical costs to continue their recent climb. The long-range financial forecast assumes a 10 percent annual increase in medical costs and a 4 percent annual increase in dental and vision costs. According to the forecast, the city's average medical monthly cost per employee has been rising every year over the past eight years, going from $609 in 2004 to $1,080 in 2012. The new forecast also includes a glimmer of hope. In 2013, according to the city's data, the medical cost was $1,075 per employee.

The most glaring difference between 2011 and 2012 is among the city's top earners. The number of workers earning more than $200,000 dropped from 22 to 15, while the number of those getting more than $100,000 decreased from 378 to 372. And the list of the highest earners, once dominated by firefighters and police officers, is no longer so.

While in 2011, 12 out of 15 top earners were from the police or fire departments, in 2012, only six public-safety officials made the top 15. One major reason is overtime spending. Last year, the city reached an agreement with its largest firefighters union, the International Association of Fire Fighters, Local 1319, to abolish the long-standing "minimum staffing" provision in the firefighters' contract. The provision, which required at least 29 firefighters on duty at all times, has consistently bumped up overtime spending in the department. Now that the department has more staffing flexibility, that number is dropping.

Christine Paras, principal financial analyst in the Administrative Services Department, told the council's Finance Committee Tuesday that city's overall spending on overtime is slated to drop by 37 percent this year.

"A lot of that has to do with the elimination of minimum staffing and the organizational changes that were done in the Fire Department," Paras said.

Though the city's list of top earner still includes members of the two public-safety departments (Fire Inspector John Parks was the city's highest earner with $288,728 in total wages, which includes $150,125 in overtime pay), most of the people at the top of the list are department heads and other high-level managers.

City Manager James Keene was second on the list with $259,529 in total compensation (most of it is salary). Fire Captain Ryan Stoddard and Police Chief Dennis Burns were third and fourth, with total compensation of $224,883 and $223,004, respectively. City Attorney Molly Stump and Assistant City Manager Pamela Antil followed, with $221,492 and $220,639, respectively.

Staff Writer Gennady Sheyner can be emailed at


There are no comments yet for this post

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Choose a category: *

Since this is the first comment on this story a new topic will also be started in Town Square! Please choose a category that best describes this story.

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields


Best Of Palo Alto ballot is here

It's time to decide what local business is worthy of the title "Best Of Palo Alto" — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 29th. Stay tuned for the results in the July 21st issue of the Palo Alto Weekly.