Editorial: New massage rules still not right | April 13, 2012 | Palo Alto Weekly | Palo Alto Online |

Palo Alto Weekly

Spectrum - April 13, 2012

Editorial: New massage rules still not right

Skeptical council members continue to question need for client logs and increased regulation

In what is becoming almost an amusing struggle between city staff and the City Council, how Palo Alto regulates massage therapists once again occupied the time and attention this week of the four-member Council Policy and Procedures Committee, police and city administrators and a city attorney.

This story contains 676 words.

Stories older than 90 days are available only to subscribing members. Please help sustain quality local journalism by becoming a subscribing member today.

If you are already a subscriber, please log in so you can continue to enjoy unlimited access to stories and archives. Subscriptions start at $5 per month and may be cancelled at any time.

Log in     Subscribe

Comments

Like this comment
Posted by Kate
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Apr 15, 2012 at 9:23 am

The Weekly says "City management missed their chance to demonstrate that on this one." Presumably, the newspaper meant 'common sense'. Is anyone surprised? So what else is new?


Like this comment
Posted by how serious?
a resident of Los Altos Hills
on Apr 16, 2012 at 9:44 am

What were those 10 complaints the police logged?


Like this comment
Posted by Walter_E_Wallis
a resident of Midtown
on Apr 16, 2012 at 12:18 pm

Walter_E_Wallis is a registered user.

How about them barbers, and Dental Hygienists, and shoe shine boys. It is way past time to revert Palo Alto to a Municipal Service District.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.