Homebuilder signs deal for Alma Plaza | March 2, 2012 | Palo Alto Weekly | Palo Alto Online |

Palo Alto Weekly

News - March 2, 2012

Homebuilder signs deal for Alma Plaza

D.R. Horton agrees to build first 19 homes in south Palo Alto plaza

by Gennady Sheyner

An ambitious plan to redevelop Alma Plaza in south Palo Alto took another leap forward Tuesday, Feb. 28, when builder D.R. Horton signed an agreement with the plaza's developer to construct the first 19 houses at the plaza.

This story contains 348 words.

Stories older than 90 days are available only to subscribing members. Please help sustain quality local journalism by becoming a subscribing member today.

If you are already a subscriber, please log in so you can continue to enjoy unlimited access to stories and archives. Subscriptions start at $5 per month and may be cancelled at any time.

Log in     Subscribe

Staff Writer Gennady Sheyner can be emailed at gsheyner@paweekly.com.

Comments

Like this comment
Posted by Just Curious
a resident of Ventura
on Feb 29, 2012 at 10:36 am

I keep wondering who gets the payoffs for approving these huge developments - (including the new one at 355 Alma) Staff? Council? Planning Commission?
All of the above? There is enough profit for more than one payoff. Not just cash but other valuable things. When a commissioner is so sad that the developer works so hard, it's obvious there is more going on behind the scenes.


Like this comment
Posted by moi
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Feb 29, 2012 at 11:44 am

Wish the city had approved a throwback cherry orchard instead.


Like this comment
Posted by Sylvia
a resident of Midtown
on Feb 29, 2012 at 11:51 am

Wow! Just Curious, that's a pretty spurious allegation you made about our council persons and/or planning commissioners being paid off to approve a housing development. Any evidence to back this up? I'm amazed you'd even think that.

While I was not in favor of McNellis' development at that site, I certainly never believed our city officials operated in bad faith.


Like this comment
Posted by South Alma resident
a resident of South of Midtown
on Feb 29, 2012 at 1:25 pm

Will these houses be for rent or for sale? Are they going to be at a relatively affordable housing rate? We could really use more affordable housing in this city.


Like this comment
Posted by Bob
a resident of Downtown North
on Feb 29, 2012 at 2:47 pm

@south alma resident:

What we really need is for all of these blighted properties to be developed with income generating businesses. The grocery store is fine. The housing is ok, but it better generate enough property taxes to offset the services it will require.

For too long this city has been on its high horse. Let's be sensible but realistic and stop being dissuaded by the NIMBY types who say no to everything then complain about the city budget.


Like this comment
Posted by disappointed
a resident of Greenmeadow
on Feb 29, 2012 at 4:03 pm

Since this is the same builder that did the UGLY, jammed together homes in the Rickey's Hyatt site, I am disappointed. Every time I pass that block and see the terrible colors and badly designed homes- I am disgusted. Now we will have more of the same in South Palo Alto. And I can't imagine what the traffic will be like if East Meadow ( family homes and schools) will be used to get to Fry's ! Not fair.


Like this comment
Posted by Allen Edwards
a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Feb 29, 2012 at 6:23 pm

If the neighbors had not complained years ago, we might have a nice expanded market there right now. Instead we have to drive to Menlo Park or Mountain View to get to a standard market. Well, at least we have TJ's but you just can't do all your shopping there. I used to live next to the Lucky there and it was very nice to walk to the market. Now it is in the car and a long drive. Congestion, pollution, etc. People in this city just complain too much, then they complain when the long delayed project is approved, then they complain when everything is too expensive. What do you think 12 years of delay (2 years is just the latest phase of delays) cost the developer? This city is way too expensive to do business in.


Like this comment
Posted by YIMBY
a resident of University South
on Mar 6, 2012 at 3:18 pm

YIMBY is a registered user.

19 new families get to move to (or within If they are existing residents) Palo Alto, and neighbors get a market patterned after the ever-popular BerkeleyBowl, and PA gets to FINALLY see this eyesore redeveloped! BRAVO on 3 fronts!


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.