Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

Homes inside the Buena Vista Mobile Home Park in Palo Alto on Feb. 14, 2023. Photo by Magali Gauthier.

Residents of Buena Vista Mobile Home Park know perfectly well what it feels like to have their lives upended by events beyond their control.

In 2017, Palo Alto’s sole mobile home park, at 3980 El Camino Real, was on the verge of being razed and converted into a luxury housing complex when the city and the county stepped in to buy it, thus preventing the displacement of nearly 400 residents. Since then, the Santa Clara County Housing Authority and its property management partners have been undertaking the long and arduous work of upgrading utilities, bringing homes up to code and making sure all households have leases that comply with all relevant regulations.

Now, the residents are preparing for a more dramatic change. On Monday, the Housing Authority unveiled to the City Council its plan to redevelop the entire park, which involves replacing old homes — also known as coaches — with new ones and constructing a three-story apartment building at the western portion of the site. In the coming months, members of each Buena Vista household will be meeting with consultants to discuss their particular needs and desires. They will then have the option of temporarily relocating to make way for construction or leaving for good.

Some residents have already left since the park was saved. The park’s population is down from 400 to 270, and the number of households has dwindled from 117 to 75, which includes 60 homeowners and 15 renters, according to Flaherty Ward, the Housing Authority’s director of real estate. By redeveloping Buena Vista, the agency plans to address long-standing concerns voiced by residents about the park’s inadequate infrastructure.

“When the utilities are impacted or the gas line has to be shut off, that impacts them,” Ward said. “And residents have consistently shared these concerns with us. And ultimately, the answer to these concerns is redeveloping the park.”

While some upgrades have already taken place, the scope of the next phase of improvements is far more ambitious. The Housing Authority plans to demolish the 10-studio motel near the center of the property, which has been vacant for the past two years, and replace all the utilities.

“Everything needs to be pulled out: the gas, the sewers, the water. Everything needs to be pulled up and redone. It’s difficult to do with brand new coaches on site,” Ward said at the council meeting. “A lot of the coaches are several decades old and they can’t survive that kind of move.”

But while everyone can get behind equipping Buena Vista with safe and reliable utilities, some residents are concerned about what the project will mean for them in the near term. Josefina Martinez, who has lived at Buena Vista for the past 16 years, told this news organization that most of her neighbors would prefer to stay where they are and many are anxious that once they are relocated, they’ll end up in a unit with less space for themselves and their families, she said.

Her son, who used to live in a residence on the El Camino Real side of the park, is among the Buena Vista residents who have already been relocated by the Housing Authority as part of its recent efforts to bring all units up to code. The new unit, Martinez said, is only about half the size of the original one.

“They had to get rid of tables, chairs and other furniture because they couldn’t fit it,” Martinez, 69, said through a translator.

Martinez has two daughters, a son and six grandchildren who live at Buena Vista. She wants to remain in the community. One of her granddaughters, Jessica Guzman, was part of a group of residents who attended the Monday hearing to learn more about the redevelopment proposal. Guzman, 21, shared with the council her concerns about ending up in a unit that is too small to accommodate her family’s growing needs. A student, Guzman said she expects to live with her family at Buena Vista for at least another two years.

“My mom always told me I can come back home, but my home might not be suitable for me to live for months and months if the size is too small or if there’s too many people who are already living there,” Guzman told the council. “These kids are going to grow up and some will have to stay home longer than necessary and that’s the reality.”

An entrance to the Buena Vista Mobile Home Park in Palo Alto on Feb. 14, 2023. Photo by Magali Gauthier.

For others, like Buena Vista resident Javier Solano, the primary concern is schools. Solano, 52, has two children who currently attend Barron Park Elementary School. His wife also works at the school.

Solano told this news organization that his biggest issue with the plan is uncertainty over whether his children would be able to continue to attend Barron Park. He is hardly alone in this regard. According to Shana Segal, member of the Palo Alto Unified School District Board of Education, 71 children from Buena Vista currently attend Barron Park Elementary, Fletcher Middle and Gunn High schools. Speaking for herself, and not as a board representative, she urged the Housing Authority to “mitigate the impacts of this plan on our families and provide transportation to each and every student.”

Solano said many residents are still learning about the Housing Authority’s plans for redevelopment and relocation of residents. He did not hesitate, however, when asked if he’d want to return to Buena Vista after the park’s renovation.

“Absolutely,” he said.

But the Housing Authority assumes that some people will reach a different decision and choose to go elsewhere. Since it took over Buena Vista, the agency had seen an annual turnover rate of about 5-10% at the property, which is comparable to the turnover rate in its broader real estate portfolio. The main difference, however, is that the Housing Authority has not been leasing out the vacated spaces at Buena Vista, said Nathan Ho, strategic communication assistant at the Housing Authority.

The units are being kept vacant for two reasons, he said. First, the Housing Authority is trying to decrease demand on the park’s aging infrastructure — particularly the gas, electric and sewer lines — which is past its useful life. Second, when a resident leaves the park, their investment required to make the unit rentable again is often higher than what the residence is worth, he said.

Ho said that between six and eight households have been leaving each year. When that happens, the Housing Authority buys the residence and provides a modest relocation payment.

“It’s important to note that our intention is to get the occupancy back up to 2017 levels after the redevelopment is complete,” Ho said in an email.

Some units fenced off in the Buena Vista Mobile Home Park in Palo Alto on Feb. 14, 2023. Photo by Magali Gauthier.

The Buena Vista project poses some unique challenges for the housing agency, said Preston Prince, who took over as its chief executive officer in 2020. As part of its agreement from six years ago, the agency is tasked with improving infrastructure, bringing all households up to code and, at the same time, preserving it as an affordable-housing community that would remain available to all present residents.

“Expectations are really high,” Prince said in an interview.

He emphasized that in pursuing the redevelopment, the agency is “thinking about the families first and foremost in our approach.” The Housing Authority has already held two community meetings about its proposed redevelopment and plans to hold more in the coming months. It has partnered with the company Associated Right of Way Services, which is advising each household about its options. And it is seriously thinking about factors such as assistance with transportation and schools, services that Prince said are important in making sure that Buena Vista remains the strong community that it is today.

“We believe in the kids, we believe in the parents. We are really wanting to create the space where they get to make the choices about their lives as they move forward,” Prince said.

Even so, each household will have to make some tough choices in the coming months, as the redevelopment plan shifts from concept to reality. Ward said in her presentation that homeowners will have three options: purchase a new residence at Buena Vista, sell their existing home to the Housing Authority and rent an apartment in the new building; or sell their residence and request a relocation assistance payment so that they can move elsewhere. Renters will have to decide whether they want to live in the new apartments or receive relocation assistance.

‘We believe in the kids, we believe in the parents. We are really wanting to create the space where they get to make the choices about their lives as they move forward.’

Preston Prince, CEO, Santa Clara County Housing Authority

“Why we’re offering this is because we do believe that not all families will want to stay while their new unit is being built, and perhaps they don’t want to live with the compliance requirements of an affordable-housing community,” Ward said at the Monday meeting, noting that the mobile home park was largely unregulated before the Housing Authority purchased the property

While the agency hopes residents will make their decisions by the end of March, the agency’s plans for the new apartment building remain somewhat hazy. The layout that the Housing Authority presented to the council this week shows a C-shaped structure on the west side of the property, its back facing the rest of the park. And while these plans were only intended to show the proposed massing (the actual building has not yet been designed), some council members and community advocates took issue with the drawing and urged the Housing Authority to make sure that the apartment complex and the mobile homes remain integrated as a single community.

Winter Dellenbach, a Barron Park resident who was at the forefront of the battle to save Buena Vista from redevelopment, urged the agency to include shared playground space and other amenities for all residents of Buena Vista, regardless of whether they live in mobile homes or apartments.

“Buena Vista is a community and changes there must foster its community,” Dellenbach told the council. “It’s one community. We can’t diminish it, we can only improve it.”

Council members agreed and requested that the housing authority explore other approaches for the new building, including having several smaller apartment buildings instead of one large one. Council member Pat Burt suggested that the site plan include more open space and recreational amenities. He and council member Julie Lythcott-Haims also suggested that the new building be reconfigured so that they face the mobile homes, which would help maintain a sense of community.

“We wouldn’t want to add an apartment building that looks like it just came from outer space and landed in the park,” Lythcott-Haims said. “I think it’s really important when we’re constructing housing for humans, particularly when we’re constructing low-income housing, to try to make sure that it affords the possibility for the sort of continuation of community rather than just some sort of governmental building.”

‘Buena Vista is a community and changes there must foster its community. It’s one community. We can’t diminish it, we can only improve it.’

Winter Dellenbach, resident, Barron Park neighborhood

Prince said in an interview that when it comes to designing the new building and improving the broader area, the Housing Authority will pay close attention to the concerns and wishes of its residents. The concept, he said, “is that all owners can remain owners and all renters will have a place in the future multifamily building.”

“As we talk about residents over the next two months, we’ll find out a little more. Maybe we’ll have more land to work with and maybe we won’t,” he said.

But while the many details are yet to be hammered out, city and county officials expressed cautious optimism about the latest redevelopment plan. Santa Clara County Supervisor Joe Simitian, who played a pivotal role in preserving Buena Vista, acknowledged at the Monday meeting that it’s taken longer than it should have for the Housing Authority to get to this point. The new redevelopment proposal, he said, is “only the beginning of the conversation.”

“Done right, the Housing Authority’s plan for redevelopment can actually increase the number of affordable housing units, upgrade the living environment for all who call Buena Vista home and preserve the sense of community that is unique to Buena Vista,” Simitian said. “Which is to say, it is important to get this right.”

Gennady Sheyner covers local and regional politics, housing, transportation and other topics for the Palo Alto Weekly, Palo Alto Online and their sister publications. He has won awards for his coverage...

Join the Conversation

5 Comments

  1. Moving and construction are hard on a community. I’m sure this has been discussed but is there any way for the apartment to be built first and let residents move in temporarily while the rest of the park is upgraded? To keep the community together? Construction delays are common. Scattering people even though temporarily will be hard especially on older residents.

    These options are a little vague. I realize managed affordable communities need rules but I also think rules should be designed to give residents a chance to move up economically. People sacrificed to actually own their homes, and it sounds like they can continue. What happens to their investments? Are there tax implications? Is someone helping community members with the financial planning aspects?

  2. Why limit the apartment building to three stories? Seems like this would be a good opportunity to add to Palo Alto’s affordable housing stock at a time when all seem to agree on that as a goal for the city. Ten years ago, neighborhood resistance to multi-story housing at the Buena Vista site made it politically impossible to seriously explore the option. A lot has changed since then.

  3. @Jerry, a mobile home park is like a mini-city within a bigger city. There are kids who play in the streets, and for the most part residents are mindful of that so they don’t drag race down the road within the park’s perimeter. It’s not suitable for a high-rise building because of the same reason why other projects the city is touting are not suitable for living. No parking.

    What’s missing in the details (or I just can’t see it) is this question — Is SCCHA turning this property into a project? If so, it WOULD limit some of the residents from coming back, because the may be over the income limit to reside there. Right now, it’s ALL AFFORDABLE. If one has income above a certain threshold, nobody can tell them they have to move because they have too much. If it’s a PROJECT and HUD is going to give vouchers to current tenants, residents who are income qualified cannot ever get ahead financially. They can’t save up for a down payment for a new car, or a quinceañera (which is actually a big deal) or a vacation, or unexpected medical costs, etc. If they stay, and their “coach” is fairly new, they have to put up with construction going on for years which poses another risk to children who live there. I’m not against providing better safety and utility upgrades but I am against forcing people away from their beloved community with potentially no way to move back after the work is done. There needs to be a whole lot of transparency in this process and NO SURPRISES for middle-to-lower income residents.

  4. @MyFeelz

    Concerns about anyone being frozen out who had a unit on the property when the mobile home park was saved and was saved from having to moved based on having a property stake in their home (though not on the land) must be equitably addressed, as you insist, before any decisions are made about Buena Vista’s future.

    On the apartment height, the current plan calls for a 3-story structure. What is the argument for limiting it to three stories rather than adding one more floor to take better advantage of the building and infrastructure expenditures required already for the shorter structure?

  5. First of all, this has taken far too long. During the 6 years since the community was ostensibly “saved” conditions have deteriorated and BV is now in danger of becoming a County-owned privately operated slum. The poor conditions have caused depopulation, with more depopulation seemingly baked into this plan and euphemistically described as “resident choice.” The City Council meeting was not reassuring, with each member offering their own micromanaging suggestions and most of them missing the broader point, that the County has broken faith with the families and students.

Leave a comment