News

With unofficial majority of votes, District Attorney Jeff Rosen poised for reelection

Former prosecutor Daniel Chung edging out public defender Sajid Khan for second position

Incumbent Jeff Rosen, left, is holding a strong lead in the race for Santa Clara County district attorney. Former prosecutor Daniel Chung, center, and public defender Sajid Khan, right, are in second and third places, respectively, according to unofficial election results. Photos of Rosen and Khan courtesy of the candidates. Photo of Chung by Magali Gauthier.

Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen took a commanding early lead on election night over his challengers, former Deputy District Attorney Daniel Chung and county Public Defender Sajid Khan.

By 4:46 p.m. Wednesday, Rosen's lead held at 58.56% to Chung's 24.29% and Khan's 17.15%, with 71% of all ballots counted, according to the Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters website. The county plans to update its results on Friday by 5 p.m.

If Rosen's majority lead sticks, he will win the election outright without the need for the general election this fall. Voters select the top two candidates to face off in November unless one contender garners more than 50% of the votes and is thus declared the winner.

Voters appeared to be less interested in radical change on either end of the spectrum than in maintaining an even-handed status quo.

Rosen, 54, who has been county DA since 2011, ran on his record as a "pragmatic progressive" who has beefed up victims' services and created programs for defendants of low-level crimes to reduce recidivism.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

He developed multiple specialized units to address specific problem areas of crime, including tackling an increase in serial burglaries and robberies and the recent spate of smash-and-grab retail burglaries, in addition to creating a major Crime and Drug Trafficking Unit that targets the fentanyl trade and organized crime.

If elected to a fourth term, Rosen said he would focus more on gun violence and keeping guns out of the hands of felons and individuals with domestic violence restraining orders.

Khan, 39, a public defender, is the son of Muslim immigrants who raised him and his siblings in Milpitas and San Jose. He ran on a big-picture reform platform of radical change and has said he would greatly reduce prosecutions by amping up special services programs to attack the root causes of crime.

He campaigned on making major shifts in how cases are prosecuted, starting with juveniles, who he would not prosecute as adults. He would work to end cash bail and seek to have records of most offenders expunged if they served their sentences. But his message of radical reform appears thus far not to have strongly resonated with voters.

Chung, 33, has been the self-proclaimed "moderate" candidate of the three. A former deputy district attorney, he was terminated by Rosen's office and ran against his former boss. He would focus on policy and structural changes within the DA's office to streamline prosecutions. He would assign the same prosecutor to handle all phases of a case rather than having multiple prosecutors involved at various stages

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Chung's campaign also prioritized prosecuting serious, violent and repeat offenders and zealously prosecuting gun, retail and hate crimes.

Rosen's financial war chest is also exponentially larger than Chung's and Khan's. He had more than $445,000 to Khan's roughly $118,000 and Chung's more than $18,000.

In a statement, Rosen appeared to declare himself the winner.

"Santa Clara County leads the way in technology, diversity, and the smart and balanced way we strive to handle criminal justice. Today's vote once again shows there is a mandate for safety and fairness. Not one at the expense of the other but both," he said.

"Although I disagree with their political positions, I respect the Democratic principle of those who also ran for this vital job. I hope they continue to use their passion to help people.

"Public safety and criminal justice reform won today — smart justice won today. Now it's back to work. I look forward with determination to face our many 21st century challenges, including gun violence, hate crime, racial disproportionality, and property crime. From Palo Alto to Gilroy, we are bending the arc toward justice."

Chung said in an email that his campaign has exceeded all expectations.

"I am grateful for the extraordinary support from the community. To be in second place, despite the lack of money and endorsements, is a true testament to the community's belief in me and my values and priorities. My message clearly resonated with people, and they want significant change to improve public safety. I look forward to seeing the full election results and making sure that every vote is counted."

Khan said by phone that he is proud of his campaign.

"We ran a very value-based, authentic and principled campaign" that has shone a light on inequity, mass incarceration and the need for mental health and other services and reforms, he said.

"I'm still curious about what the rest of the night will look like," he said.

This story will be updated as more results become available.

Craving a new voice in Peninsula dining?

Sign up for the Peninsula Foodist newsletter.

Sign up now
Sue Dremann
 
Sue Dremann is a veteran journalist who joined the Palo Alto Weekly in 2001. She is a breaking news and general assignment reporter who also covers the regional environmental, health and crime beats. Read more >>

Follow Palo Alto Online and the Palo Alto Weekly on Twitter @paloaltoweekly, Facebook and on Instagram @paloaltoonline for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Your support is vital to us continuing to bring you crime news. Become a member today.

With unofficial majority of votes, District Attorney Jeff Rosen poised for reelection

Former prosecutor Daniel Chung edging out public defender Sajid Khan for second position

by / Palo Alto Weekly

Uploaded: Tue, Jun 7, 2022, 10:38 pm
Updated: Thu, Jun 9, 2022, 5:08 pm

Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen took a commanding early lead on election night over his challengers, former Deputy District Attorney Daniel Chung and county Public Defender Sajid Khan.

By 4:46 p.m. Wednesday, Rosen's lead held at 58.56% to Chung's 24.29% and Khan's 17.15%, with 71% of all ballots counted, according to the Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters website. The county plans to update its results on Friday by 5 p.m.

If Rosen's majority lead sticks, he will win the election outright without the need for the general election this fall. Voters select the top two candidates to face off in November unless one contender garners more than 50% of the votes and is thus declared the winner.

Voters appeared to be less interested in radical change on either end of the spectrum than in maintaining an even-handed status quo.

Rosen, 54, who has been county DA since 2011, ran on his record as a "pragmatic progressive" who has beefed up victims' services and created programs for defendants of low-level crimes to reduce recidivism.

He developed multiple specialized units to address specific problem areas of crime, including tackling an increase in serial burglaries and robberies and the recent spate of smash-and-grab retail burglaries, in addition to creating a major Crime and Drug Trafficking Unit that targets the fentanyl trade and organized crime.

If elected to a fourth term, Rosen said he would focus more on gun violence and keeping guns out of the hands of felons and individuals with domestic violence restraining orders.

Khan, 39, a public defender, is the son of Muslim immigrants who raised him and his siblings in Milpitas and San Jose. He ran on a big-picture reform platform of radical change and has said he would greatly reduce prosecutions by amping up special services programs to attack the root causes of crime.

He campaigned on making major shifts in how cases are prosecuted, starting with juveniles, who he would not prosecute as adults. He would work to end cash bail and seek to have records of most offenders expunged if they served their sentences. But his message of radical reform appears thus far not to have strongly resonated with voters.

Chung, 33, has been the self-proclaimed "moderate" candidate of the three. A former deputy district attorney, he was terminated by Rosen's office and ran against his former boss. He would focus on policy and structural changes within the DA's office to streamline prosecutions. He would assign the same prosecutor to handle all phases of a case rather than having multiple prosecutors involved at various stages

Chung's campaign also prioritized prosecuting serious, violent and repeat offenders and zealously prosecuting gun, retail and hate crimes.

Rosen's financial war chest is also exponentially larger than Chung's and Khan's. He had more than $445,000 to Khan's roughly $118,000 and Chung's more than $18,000.

In a statement, Rosen appeared to declare himself the winner.

"Santa Clara County leads the way in technology, diversity, and the smart and balanced way we strive to handle criminal justice. Today's vote once again shows there is a mandate for safety and fairness. Not one at the expense of the other but both," he said.

"Although I disagree with their political positions, I respect the Democratic principle of those who also ran for this vital job. I hope they continue to use their passion to help people.

"Public safety and criminal justice reform won today — smart justice won today. Now it's back to work. I look forward with determination to face our many 21st century challenges, including gun violence, hate crime, racial disproportionality, and property crime. From Palo Alto to Gilroy, we are bending the arc toward justice."

Chung said in an email that his campaign has exceeded all expectations.

"I am grateful for the extraordinary support from the community. To be in second place, despite the lack of money and endorsements, is a true testament to the community's belief in me and my values and priorities. My message clearly resonated with people, and they want significant change to improve public safety. I look forward to seeing the full election results and making sure that every vote is counted."

Khan said by phone that he is proud of his campaign.

"We ran a very value-based, authentic and principled campaign" that has shone a light on inequity, mass incarceration and the need for mental health and other services and reforms, he said.

"I'm still curious about what the rest of the night will look like," he said.

This story will be updated as more results become available.

Comments

Rosemary Fernandez
Registered user
another community
on Jun 8, 2022 at 3:40 pm
Rosemary Fernandez, another community
Registered user
on Jun 8, 2022 at 3:40 pm

Santa Clara County Family Court System needs to be overhauled


Melinda Stefan
Registered user
Stanford
on Jun 8, 2022 at 10:09 pm
Melinda Stefan, Stanford
Registered user
on Jun 8, 2022 at 10:09 pm

Thank you for the article. It is interesting to note that, for every 1% of the votes received, Rosen spent $ 7544, Chung spent $ 743 and Khan spent $ 7036. So why was Chung's campaign so effective, even though he did not win ?


Elaine Stone
Registered user
Barron Park
on Jun 9, 2022 at 12:29 am
Elaine Stone, Barron Park
Registered user
on Jun 9, 2022 at 12:29 am

Before Election Day, I knocked on doors and delivered the message: Chung will prosecute repeat offenders and got a thumbs up from neighbors. Chung has grass-roots support. An older Paloaltoonline article on Chung himself has very positive comments rooting for him "Go Daniel go" It is very heart warming. Chung wrote so well in his Feb. 14 2021 letter to SJMN about the current state of prosecution, that it should be required reading for any thinking man who wonders why law and order has declined. For writing that he was fired?!!!!!! chungforchange.com/media 1st letter
It is time for people in the know to speak up. We lament the fact that not enough good people come forward for public service. Yet when a talented and hardworking young person tries to break into the circle, the old boy network stops him. The voters are the "boss" who decides who gets the job, yet the boss has no access to the true report card. A candidate like Chung has not appeared in the last 12 years. The majority of voters do not probe deeper so the press has the duty to inform. When one has crucial information but omits to provide it, and it does harm to the community, it is a mistake of omission that is unforgivable.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.