News

Caltrain gets a lifeline after counties strike compromise on tax measure

Supervisors agree to keep governance reforms out of tax measure, include them in separate resolution

The Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors voted on Aug. 4 to support placing on the November ballot a sales tax to fund Caltrain operations. Embarcadero Media file photo by Veronica Weber.

Seeking to ward off the financial collapse of Caltrain, the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors agreed on Tuesday to support placing on the November ballot a sales tax measure to fund the transit agency's operations.

The board's vote offered the tax measure a last-minute reprieve after weeks of dispute and acrimony among the counties and agencies that make up the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Authority, which operates the rail line. Transit officials and elected representatives have clashed over the issue of governance reforms, which some had argued needed to be included as part of the tax proposal.

Supervisors from San Francisco and Santa Clara counties have long complained about the fact that San Mateo County has the lion's share of control over Caltrain operations, since the San Mateo County Transit District manages the agency.

But while supervisors from San Francisco and Santa Clara counties made the case for governance reforms, San Mateo supervisors countered that including these reforms in the tax measure would be illegal. After the San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted last week to tie funding to governance reforms, the effort hit a seemingly insurmountable obstacle on Friday, when the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency fell a vote shy of approving the placement of the San Francisco-approved measure on the ballot.

Any ballot measure would require approval from all three boards of supervisors and four transit agencies before it can be placed on the ballot.

What's local journalism worth to you?

Support Palo Alto Online for as little as $5/month.

Learn more

Now, with just days left until the Aug. 7 deadline for placing the one-eighth of a cent sales tax on the November ballot, there appears to be a compromise. Cindy Chavez, president of the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors and a proponent of government reform, announced at Tuesday's meeting a "compendium resolution" signed by herself, San Francisco Supervisor Shamann Walton, San Mateo County Supervisor David Pine and Steve Heminger, a member at the SFMTA board of directors (all four are members of the Caltrain board of directors).

Both Chavez and Walton had advocated over the past month for tying the ballot measure to government reforms, while Pine and Heminger had expressed support for a "clean" tax measure.

The proposed ballot measure, which will go to the Caltrain board for approval on Thursday, would commit the agency to pursue various governance reforms. These include the hiring of an independent auditor and an independent counsel for Caltrain by Nov. 30. Caltrain would also be required to recommend a new governance structure or procedures to the three counties by no later than Dec. 31, 2021.

"Taken together, these resolutions will address Caltrain's critical funding need while also focusing our efforts on addressing the long standing issues regarding the governance relationships and management of Caltrain," the letter co-signed by Chavez, Walton, Pine and Heminger states.

Chavez said that the commitments in the resolution allow her to support the original measure, which did not include the governance changes. While the measure still faces numerous hurdles, the Board of Supervisors' 5-0 vote creates a path forward for a proposal that Caltrain leaders say is desperately needed to ward off the service shutdown.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Sign up

The Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority will have an opportunity to review the resolution on Thursday evening and both the San Francisco Board of Supervisors and SFMTA board had indicated that they could schedule special meetings this week to consider the "clean" ballot measure. San Mateo County and Caltrain had already approved placing the clean measure on the ballot.

While the ballot measure will not address governance, Chavez said that compendium resolution will address the concerns of those seeking reform. The point, she said, was to "get at least on the record a plan for how we could address governance issues in a timely manner."

"These questions have been swirling around for a while," Chavez said. "I appreciate that folks weren't afraid to roll up their sleeves, keep talking and get to yes."

In Palo Alto, the issue of Caltrain governance also became a sticking point last month, when Mayor Adrian Fine submitted a letter on behalf of the city advocating for placing the tax on the ballot. Vice Mayor Tom DuBois responded by sending his own letter to the various transit agencies and boards of supervisors in the three counties stating that Fine represents only his own views and not those of the council, which had yet to discuss the issue.

On Monday night, the council overcame the epistolary spat and unanimously supported a letter to Santa Clara County advocating for placing the measure on the ballot. The letter also requested that Caltrain and Santa Clara County address the "longstanding and complex issue" of governance. Without a solution, the letter noted, Caltrain is likely to run out of funds before the end of the year and face a $71 million deficit in the next fiscal year.

"Caltrain is a vital link in the region's transit network, which provides critical alternatives to single-occupancy vehicle travel," Palo Alto's letter states. "Thousands of essential workers and transit-dependent riders continue to use the service."

Councilwoman Liz Kniss, a former Caltrain board member, also included in the council's motion a request that the transit agency "support efforts in the future to work with other jurisdictions on the governance issue." Kniss likened the current funding mechanism for Caltrain to a "handshake" deal between the three counties.

"When the money is there, everything works out well. When it isn't, you get back into a situation as we (have) today," said Kniss, who in the past had advocated for governance reforms. "I don't think we should hang it all up tonight by demanding it."

Craving a new voice in Peninsula dining?

Sign up for the Peninsula Foodist newsletter.

Sign up now

Follow Palo Alto Online and the Palo Alto Weekly on Twitter @paloaltoweekly, Facebook and on Instagram @paloaltoonline for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Caltrain gets a lifeline after counties strike compromise on tax measure

Supervisors agree to keep governance reforms out of tax measure, include them in separate resolution

by / Palo Alto Weekly

Uploaded: Tue, Aug 4, 2020, 1:28 pm

Seeking to ward off the financial collapse of Caltrain, the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors agreed on Tuesday to support placing on the November ballot a sales tax measure to fund the transit agency's operations.

The board's vote offered the tax measure a last-minute reprieve after weeks of dispute and acrimony among the counties and agencies that make up the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Authority, which operates the rail line. Transit officials and elected representatives have clashed over the issue of governance reforms, which some had argued needed to be included as part of the tax proposal.

Supervisors from San Francisco and Santa Clara counties have long complained about the fact that San Mateo County has the lion's share of control over Caltrain operations, since the San Mateo County Transit District manages the agency.

But while supervisors from San Francisco and Santa Clara counties made the case for governance reforms, San Mateo supervisors countered that including these reforms in the tax measure would be illegal. After the San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted last week to tie funding to governance reforms, the effort hit a seemingly insurmountable obstacle on Friday, when the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency fell a vote shy of approving the placement of the San Francisco-approved measure on the ballot.

Any ballot measure would require approval from all three boards of supervisors and four transit agencies before it can be placed on the ballot.

Now, with just days left until the Aug. 7 deadline for placing the one-eighth of a cent sales tax on the November ballot, there appears to be a compromise. Cindy Chavez, president of the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors and a proponent of government reform, announced at Tuesday's meeting a "compendium resolution" signed by herself, San Francisco Supervisor Shamann Walton, San Mateo County Supervisor David Pine and Steve Heminger, a member at the SFMTA board of directors (all four are members of the Caltrain board of directors).

Both Chavez and Walton had advocated over the past month for tying the ballot measure to government reforms, while Pine and Heminger had expressed support for a "clean" tax measure.

The proposed ballot measure, which will go to the Caltrain board for approval on Thursday, would commit the agency to pursue various governance reforms. These include the hiring of an independent auditor and an independent counsel for Caltrain by Nov. 30. Caltrain would also be required to recommend a new governance structure or procedures to the three counties by no later than Dec. 31, 2021.

"Taken together, these resolutions will address Caltrain's critical funding need while also focusing our efforts on addressing the long standing issues regarding the governance relationships and management of Caltrain," the letter co-signed by Chavez, Walton, Pine and Heminger states.

Chavez said that the commitments in the resolution allow her to support the original measure, which did not include the governance changes. While the measure still faces numerous hurdles, the Board of Supervisors' 5-0 vote creates a path forward for a proposal that Caltrain leaders say is desperately needed to ward off the service shutdown.

The Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority will have an opportunity to review the resolution on Thursday evening and both the San Francisco Board of Supervisors and SFMTA board had indicated that they could schedule special meetings this week to consider the "clean" ballot measure. San Mateo County and Caltrain had already approved placing the clean measure on the ballot.

While the ballot measure will not address governance, Chavez said that compendium resolution will address the concerns of those seeking reform. The point, she said, was to "get at least on the record a plan for how we could address governance issues in a timely manner."

"These questions have been swirling around for a while," Chavez said. "I appreciate that folks weren't afraid to roll up their sleeves, keep talking and get to yes."

In Palo Alto, the issue of Caltrain governance also became a sticking point last month, when Mayor Adrian Fine submitted a letter on behalf of the city advocating for placing the tax on the ballot. Vice Mayor Tom DuBois responded by sending his own letter to the various transit agencies and boards of supervisors in the three counties stating that Fine represents only his own views and not those of the council, which had yet to discuss the issue.

On Monday night, the council overcame the epistolary spat and unanimously supported a letter to Santa Clara County advocating for placing the measure on the ballot. The letter also requested that Caltrain and Santa Clara County address the "longstanding and complex issue" of governance. Without a solution, the letter noted, Caltrain is likely to run out of funds before the end of the year and face a $71 million deficit in the next fiscal year.

"Caltrain is a vital link in the region's transit network, which provides critical alternatives to single-occupancy vehicle travel," Palo Alto's letter states. "Thousands of essential workers and transit-dependent riders continue to use the service."

Councilwoman Liz Kniss, a former Caltrain board member, also included in the council's motion a request that the transit agency "support efforts in the future to work with other jurisdictions on the governance issue." Kniss likened the current funding mechanism for Caltrain to a "handshake" deal between the three counties.

"When the money is there, everything works out well. When it isn't, you get back into a situation as we (have) today," said Kniss, who in the past had advocated for governance reforms. "I don't think we should hang it all up tonight by demanding it."

Comments

PhilB
Registered user
St. Claire Gardens
on Aug 5, 2020 at 10:34 am
PhilB, St. Claire Gardens
Registered user
on Aug 5, 2020 at 10:34 am
12 people like this

Finally, a voice of reason.

It would be sheer lunacy to let Caltrain shut down. No one has repealed the laws of economics, which says that a recession is always followed by a recovery, no matter what the "Chicken Little" people are saying.


No to more taxes
Registered user
Downtown North
on Aug 5, 2020 at 10:59 am
No to more taxes, Downtown North
Registered user
on Aug 5, 2020 at 10:59 am
7 people like this

This tax would generate more funds than CalTrain now uses. You know with the extra money they will just pay themselves more and waste the funds. Plus we don't need more taxes.

It is time for our elected representatives to look seriously at what services are needed to serve the community and focus on those. They may need to cut some services to individuals, cut salaries, cut overhead and get serious about what really needs to be funded.

We do need more funds to go to services that benefit all of the residents of the area but these should come from the large amount of tax that is already collected and community funding should supplant funding that only benefits individuals. It is called making hard choices and the community well being should come first.

Funding for trains, roads, parks, community playing fields, hospitals, that benefit everyone, should be the priority.


CGPA
Registered user
Downtown North
on Aug 5, 2020 at 11:08 am
CGPA, Downtown North
Registered user
on Aug 5, 2020 at 11:08 am
15 people like this

It still has to pass a bunch of voters working from home, possibly for years, who may see little benefit to paying for it.


Resident 1-Adobe Meadows
Registered user
Adobe-Meadow
on Aug 5, 2020 at 11:26 am
Resident 1-Adobe Meadows, Adobe-Meadow
Registered user
on Aug 5, 2020 at 11:26 am
2 people like this

CGPA was the one threatening violence on another topic. Sounded like the group that is intent on taking down the economy of the state. To what purpose? If you keep taking down major cities then there will be no tourist, no new jobs, no new housing.

The train is operating now. People are going places. The golf courses are filled up. The people are on the streets eating dinner. People are on the move. It is coming back. Everyone is not going to be sitting in their homes working. YEAH. Still do not see the governor stepping in here. Transportation should be a main state budget item. It should not be left up to the SF supervisors who sit in their offices all day.
The governor needs to focus on major issues which effect the total economy. Yes - one focus now but that is temporary.


Kathy
Registered user
Greater Miranda
on Aug 5, 2020 at 12:29 pm
Kathy, Greater Miranda
Registered user
on Aug 5, 2020 at 12:29 pm
14 people like this

Caltrain is a great resource, however, the trains are running empty, with Covid and everyone telecommuting. The proposed Caltrain sales tax @ $100 million/year is $70 million more/year than the $30 million in subsidies Caltrain currently receives from already existing and remaining transportation sales taxes. That extra $30 million/year won't be refunded to us if this new, additional sales tax is passed. It'll just be absorbed by the other not so efficient transit agencies, VTA, Samtrans, and Muni. I suggest Muni, VTA and Samtrans economize instead in these down times.

Santa Clara County's sales tax is already a minimum of 9% --- a regressive tax on the low income and unemployed population to generate an extra $70 million/year to transport Caltrain's affluent ridership. 30 year regressive taxes aren't needed to get over temporary financing bumps, especially when there are existing transportation sales taxes in place.


Be accurate
Registered user
Charleston Meadows
on Aug 5, 2020 at 12:32 pm
Be accurate, Charleston Meadows
Registered user
on Aug 5, 2020 at 12:32 pm
4 people like this

The word "lunacy" has been brought up. This is a diesel powered train, as far as I know. In the Silicon Valley ... in 2020 ... and going forward.
The Caltrain electrification project started as far back as 1992. Several cities sued over elevated tracks, etc. The funding has been stopped by Elaine Chao, the "transportation secretary" appointed based on merit exclusively.
This is what lunacy is. 2020 ... USA ... Silicon Valley ... diesel.


Me 2
Registered user
Old Palo Alto
on Aug 5, 2020 at 2:08 pm
Me 2, Old Palo Alto
Registered user
on Aug 5, 2020 at 2:08 pm
6 people like this

What's with Supervisor Cindy Chavez and her love of sales taxes?


chris
Registered user
University South
on Aug 5, 2020 at 2:29 pm
chris, University South
Registered user
on Aug 5, 2020 at 2:29 pm
2 people like this

Kathy,

The time of the people gridlocked on the roads is worth far more than the cost of this tax. It this fails, the little people who have to drive to work will be hurt the worst regardless of how regressive you think this tax is.


Old Steve
Registered user
St. Claire Gardens
on Aug 5, 2020 at 2:31 pm
Old Steve, St. Claire Gardens
Registered user
on Aug 5, 2020 at 2:31 pm
4 people like this

@Be Accurate:

How Ironic! You are writing about diesel while poles and wires are being installed every night, AND EMU train sets have been being manufactured in Salt Lake City for three years. The first train set is being live tested for delivery when the power is ready.


Online Name
Registered user
Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Aug 5, 2020 at 2:39 pm
Online Name, Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
Registered user
on Aug 5, 2020 at 2:39 pm
4 people like this

Reportedly car sales are up and use of mass transit is down.

As Kathy notes above, lots of competing transit authorities who don't apparently work well with each other resulting in inflated costs, waste, overlap, unnecessary inconveniences due to poor planning and failure to communicate etc

We're already over-taxed. Let them cot costs for a change.


Kevin
Registered user
Greendell/Walnut Grove
on Aug 5, 2020 at 3:10 pm
Kevin, Greendell/Walnut Grove
Registered user
on Aug 5, 2020 at 3:10 pm
6 people like this

@Be accurate

They're actually diesel-electric hybrid locomotives, like a hybrid car.


Old Steve
Registered user
St. Claire Gardens
on Aug 5, 2020 at 4:16 pm
Old Steve, St. Claire Gardens
Registered user
on Aug 5, 2020 at 4:16 pm
4 people like this

Yes what is out there today is diesel-electric. Here is a link to what is on the way. Only in CA would we shut down a transit system in construction of new motive power and vehicles, all already paid for. Shouldn't we give the new system a chance first?

Web Link


Be accurate
Registered user
Charleston Meadows
on Aug 5, 2020 at 5:55 pm
Be accurate, Charleston Meadows
Registered user
on Aug 5, 2020 at 5:55 pm
2 people like this

Hi all commenters, thank you.
Now .. want to know what ironic is?
It is this:
Web Link
and this:
Web Link.
and this:
Web Link
and this:
Web Link

But by all means, let us celebrate electrifying 75% of the diesel (sorry, hybrid) train by 2022 ... now maybe 2023. Seriously, so much can be achieved in a society that has basic checks for self-centered and immature (and inefficient) corporate greed.


Resident 1-Adobe Meadows
Registered user
Adobe-Meadow
on Aug 5, 2020 at 6:33 pm
Resident 1-Adobe Meadows, Adobe-Meadow
Registered user
on Aug 5, 2020 at 6:33 pm
6 people like this

Accurate - not going to open a bunch of untitled entry's. what is your point? Just say it.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.