Federal rule change could cut thousands of county residents from free food program | News | Palo Alto Online |


Federal rule change could cut thousands of county residents from free food program

School districts and county supervisors take votes to formally oppose the changes

Three million Americans could lose access to federal food assistance programs under new rules proposed by the Trump administration, including thousands of residents in Santa Clara County.

The changes, proposed in July and still receiving public comments, would impose restrictions on eligibility to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), formerly known as food stamps. While allowances are currently made for families earning more than 130% of the federal poverty level -- or $32,640 in annual income for a family of four -- the new rules would make that cut off in flexible.

The new rules would also prevent cross-qualification for children to receive free and reduced-price meals at school, which would take an estimated 2,000 off school meal benefits in Santa Clara County.

A growing number of local elected officials and nonprofit leaders have denounced the proposed changes in recent weeks, arguing that the new rules would create more red tape and paperwork while harming people who can't afford food in the Bay Area.

"We're very concerned about this rule change," said Tracy Weatherby, vice president of strategy and advocacy for Second Harvest of Silicon Valley. "This attempt to choke off some of these nutrition benefits is really difficult for us to see."

Currently, SNAP's benefits are available to families making more than 130% of the federal poverty level through what's called categorical eligibility. This allows states, including California, to screen clients who make up to 200% of the poverty level and grant food benefits to families who spent a large portion of their income on housing and child care expenses.

SNAP's framework also allows families to cross qualify for assistance, meaning those who receive benefits are also automatically enrolled in free and reduced-price meal programs at schools.

Under the proposed changes, 130% of the poverty level will be a hard cutoff for SNAP, and families must file separately to qualify for school meals. Estimates from Second Harvest and Santa Clara County indicate that a total of 7,000 people in the county would lose benefits, including 1,850 seniors and 2,850 children.

In the Bay Area, families making up to 200% of the federal poverty level — about $50,000 — still struggle to afford groceries each month, Weatherby said. She decried the Trump administration's stated goal of removing 3 million people from food stamps.

"It's literally their goal to get people off of nutritional benefit programs," Weatherby said. "We don't understand how that helps people get on their feet and thrive and be helpful members of the community.

"Even though we don't have a super high unemployment rate, it's hard for people to get by here. They may need to come to us that last week of the month so they can pay the rent," she said.

For families that remain eligible, the rule changes will mean the "additional administrative burdens" for applying for state and federal assistance programs separately, Weatherby said. County officials say it will also be more expensive and take longer to process more applications for CalWorks and CalFresh, California's implementation of SNAP., delaying access to food for eligible families.

The Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors voted to oppose the changes on Sept. 10. Last month, Mountain View Whisman School District's board of trustees took a similar, unanimous stance in opposition on Aug. 22.

"I don't think there should be impediments to a student's ability to receive a free or reduced (price) lunch if the family needs assistance," said trustee Laura Blakely shortly before the vote. "Kids can't learn when they're hungry."

Along with cracking down on eligibility for the free food program, the Trump administration released a detailed proposal last month on how it would expand the definition of "public charge," which would make it more difficult for immigrant families reliant on public assistance to gain permanent status or citizenship.

Many forms of government assistance would remain available to families — particularly those with children who are U.S. citizens. But advocates argue that the proposed rules have scared families away from using subsidized food, health care and other programs.

Nicole Fargo Nosich, associate director of Community Services Agency of Mountain View and Los Altos, said consequences have already been felt: Children who are born in the country aren't getting benefits they are entitled to because their parents are afraid, either because they are undocumented or in the process of getting citizenship.

"Just the very mention of passing a policy like this just makes it so people who should be getting the service just end up refusing to enroll out of fear, which ends up hurting them," Nosich said.

Community Services Agency, which offers food pantry services, may have an even more important role to play in feeding local residents if the U.S. Department of Agriculture moves forward with the rule changes. Unlike SNAP benefits, which are based on the federal poverty level and are difficult to attain in the Bay Area, Community Services Agency and other nonprofits grant food access based on the higher area median income, Nosich said. These agencies would then see more people coming in seeking assistance.


Follow the Palo Alto Weekly/Palo Alto Online on Twitter @PaloAltoWeekly and Facebook for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Kevin Forestieri writes for the Mountain View Voice, the sister publication of PaloAltoOnline.com.

What is community worth to you?
Support local journalism.


2 people like this
Posted by A new low.
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Sep 26, 2019 at 12:49 pm

A new low. is a registered user.

Cutting funding for food for low income families is a new low.

This makes my heart ache.

Like this comment
Posted by Anon
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Sep 26, 2019 at 1:50 pm

Demoralizing, yes. But, not exactly "new".

Web Link

Like this comment
Posted by no heart, voila, no heartache!
a resident of Greendell/Walnut Grove
on Sep 26, 2019 at 1:55 pm

> This makes my heart ache.

Welp, the peeps doing this don't have to worry about heartache.

9 people like this
Posted by Liz Gardner
a resident of Mayfield
on Sep 26, 2019 at 3:18 pm

This is not only a loss food in the bellies of our children, it's a loss of funding for our local school districts as well. These draconian, regressive and punitive measures is another way for Trumpism to lay a heavy, depressing blow on the shoulders of our most vulnerable - children and families. SAME SHAME DIFFERENT DAY! Our oppressive tax policies first went after our public education, then our right to decent/safe affordable housing. Now they are clearing out the crumbs from the shelves our cupboards.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Redwood City gets two new barbecue restaurants
By Elena Kadvany | 2 comments | 3,642 views

Flying: How to lower your impact
By Sherry Listgarten | 19 comments | 3,180 views

Premarital and Couples: Here Be Dragons!
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 2,593 views

Overachieving in High School: Is It Worth It?
By Jessica Zang | 18 comments | 2,418 views

Pseudo-Primary for CA Senate District 13: some thoughts
By Douglas Moran | 3 comments | 1,636 views


Short story writers wanted!

The 34th Annual Palo Alto Weekly Short Story Contest is now accepting entries for Adult, Young Adult and Teen categories. Send us your short story (2,500 words or less) and entry form by March 27, 2020. First, Second and Third Place prizes awarded in each category. Sponsored by Kepler's Books, Linden Tree Books and Bell's Books.

Contest Details