News

County asks judge to strike down expanded religious refusal rule

State, San Francisco, medical groups also take legal action against rule set to take effect Nov. 22

Santa Clara County, San Francisco, the state of California and an array of medical groups asked a federal judge on Thursday to strike down an expanded version of a measure known as the religious refusal rule.

The rule announced by the administration of President Donald Trump in June would allow health care institutions and many types of workers to refuse services on religious grounds and would deny federal health, welfare and education funds to state and local governments that don't comply.

U.S. District Judge William Alsup will hold a hearing on the request in San Francisco on Oct. 30. He will also hear a competing motion by the U.S. Justice Department for dismissal of the state and local governments' lawsuits.

The rule was originally due to take effect on July 22, but after the lawsuits were filed, the Health and Human Services Department agreed to delay implementation until Nov. 22.

The local opponents claim the rule illegally goes far beyond conscience protections previously granted by Congress to doctors and certain other personnel and would allow "virtually anyone involved in the provision of health care to refuse to provide vital services and information to patients."

Front office staff and call operators would be among those who could refuse to help, with no exception for emergencies, and patients who would be harmed include women seeking contraceptive care and abortions and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people, the lawsuits claim.

"Far from preventing discrimination, the rule perpetuates widespread discrimination against populations that have historically faced obstacles to obtaining care," the local governments say.

Justice Department lawyers representing the Health and Human Services Department argued in their brief last month that the rule is consistent with the protections in laws enacted by Congress.

Those laws and the new rule "simply ensure that the targeted federal funds are not used to disadvantage individuals or entities on the basis of objections to certain health care activities, some of which may be rooted in religion," the federal attorneys wrote.

Alsup is presiding over three similar lawsuits filed by the state, San Francisco and Santa Clara County together with a coalition of medical and civil rights groups. At his request, they filed a joint brief supporting their motions for summary judgment.

The state could risk losing $77.6 billion and San Francisco and Santa Clara County each $1 billion in federal funding, according to the brief.

---

Follow the Palo Alto Weekly/Palo Alto Online on Twitter @PaloAltoWeekly and Facebook for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

What is community worth to you?
Support local journalism.

Comments

16 people like this
Posted by MAGA
a resident of Downtown North
on Sep 13, 2019 at 5:27 pm

Not treating an emergency room patient because you do not like their religion is evil


Like this comment
Posted by Simple Solution
a resident of Barron Park
on Sep 13, 2019 at 6:15 pm

[Post removed.]


18 people like this
Posted by WWJD
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Sep 13, 2019 at 6:18 pm

- Not treating an emergency room patient because you do not like their religion is evil

I don't have time to read this, but I'm thinking: must be some fringe religion. Any religion based on the teachings of Jesus Christ would never dream of doing such evil...


8 people like this
Posted by Resident
a resident of Downtown North
on Sep 16, 2019 at 12:51 pm

As the parent of a trans child, I am very proud of our County and State for standing against this discriminatory ruling. It is unfathomable to me that our Justice Department is supporting it. Please, let's all stand together against any form of discrimination.


2 people like this
Posted by Healthcare VS Wedding Cakes
a resident of Barron Park
on Sep 16, 2019 at 1:18 pm

In terms of healthcare, there is no room for discrimination based on religious grounds.

On the other hand and in reference to that baker who refused to sell a lesbian couple a wedding cake, he shouldn't have been prosecuted for that.

Don't retail food establishments have the right to refuse service? And besides, it was just a wedding cake. No big deal.

If I was the baker with those particular sentiments, I would have baked them their cake to make money off the transaction but refused to put the little plastic lesbian couple figurines atop the cake...they could do that themselves.


2 people like this
Posted by Martin Niemöller
a resident of Green Acres
on Sep 16, 2019 at 2:22 pm

First they came for the "little plastic lesbian couple figurines"...


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields


All your news. All in one place. Every day.

Squid ink paella & patatas bravas: Barcelona natives bring Spanish tapas to Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 1 comment | 3,741 views

What to do with all those cardboard boxes
By Cheryl Bac | 2 comments | 2,095 views

Lights Out! Foods to Snuggle With in the Dark
By Laura Stec | 0 comments | 2,041 views

Premarital and Couples: The "Right" Way to Eat an Artichoke
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,572 views

Some answers, please, PG&E
By Diana Diamond | 11 comments | 1,170 views

 

Race Results Are In

Thank you for joining us at the 35th annual Moonlight Run & Walk! All proceeds benefit the Palo Alto Weekly Holiday fund, supporting local nonprofits serving children and families.

Click for Race Results