Behind UC's 'admission by exception' side door: sports, money, diversity — and secrecy | News | Palo Alto Online |


Behind UC's 'admission by exception' side door: sports, money, diversity — and secrecy

The entrance to the University of California, Berkeley, one of the nation's most selective public universities. (Photo via Lucentius)

Each November, tens of thousands of high school students file their applications to the University of California and an army of admissions staffers begins deciding who will be accepted to the nation's most prestigious public university.

Now, the Varsity Blues scandal has cast a spotlight on a once-obscure part of that admissions process. Known as "admissions by exception," it gives campuses flexibility to admit up to 6% of each entering class from applicants who don't meet UC's minimum standards, but have a special talent or come from a disadvantaged background.

While it's unclear if admissions by exception played a direct role in the college cheating scandal, it has surfaced as a potential weak spot as policymakers seek ways to bulletproof the university's admission system from scammers.

Documents and interviews with admissions officers show UC's nine undergraduate campuses are using the policy in very different ways — ways that some campuses prefer to keep secret, even after an internal UC audit urged more transparency.

In response to a public records request from CalMatters, for instance, most campuses said they had no documentation of how many students are admitted by exception each year. At least one campus exceeded the 6% cap in 2018.

Just one campus — UCLA — provided records outlining the total numbers and demographics of students admitted under the policy, while two others—UC Santa Cruz and UC Riverside—verbally detailed how they select the exceptional admits.

Together, the three campuses offer a glimpse of how admissions by exception works and how campuses use it to their advantage. Perhaps best known as a tool for athletic recruitment, the policy also helps campuses open access to non-traditional students, and even shore up their bottom lines.

UCLA: A leg up for athletic stars

At highly-selective UCLA, most of the 132 students admitted by exception in 2018 came from California, according to documents obtained under CalMatters' public records request. All but about a dozen were athletes or possessed other special talents.

While athletes made up the bulk of that group, UCLA spokesperson Ricardo Vazquez said it also included applicants with skills in music and art. More than a third had grade point averages below 3.5, well under the 4.25 median GPA for all admitted freshmen that year. The GPAs of another quarter of admits are listed as "missing."

"Extraordinary talent of any sort, athletic or otherwise, can limit a student's ability to meet eligibility requirements because of the time commitments some of those activities may involve," Vazquez wrote in a statement to CalMatters.

UCLA has long used admission by exception for athletic recruitment. Its officials told the NCAA in a 2011 report that about half of all student-athletes were admitted via the policy—including 85 percent of football players on scholarship—compared with fewer than two percent of incoming freshmen overall.

The practice is not without risks. UC Berkeley overhauled its admissions process for athletes five years ago after revelations that graduation rates on its men's football and basketball teams ranked last in the country. But UCLA officials wrote in 2011 that "given UCLA's highly competitive academic reality for admitting first-year students in general, there is no real alternative...if UCLA is to compete athletically with any success."

Recruits recommended by coaches must be reviewed for admission by exception only if they lack the minimum qualifications for UC. Those include earning a C or better in each of a sequence of college prep courses, including four years of English and three years of math; averaging at least a 3.0 GPA; and taking the SAT or ACT.

UCLA's admission practices have come under scrutiny since soccer coach Jorge Salcedo was ensnared in the nationwide college admissions scandal, charged with accepting $200,000 in bribes from wealthy families to recruit their children as players. A recent Los Angeles Times investigation identified a handful of students with close ties to athletics department employees who were recruited as athletes despite appearing to have little experience in their sports.

Vazquez declined to comment on whether admissions by exception played a role in those cases, citing student privacy. He said the university is reviewing its use of the policy, which has become increasingly limited to unusually talented students as UCLA has grown in popularity: For some years, it has received more applications than any other university in the United States.

UC Riverside: Homeschooler advantage

Like UCLA, UC Riverside fields Division 1 sports teams, but campus policy limits the number of athletes admitted by exception to 1% of each entering class. Instead, the campus targets those students with extreme educational disadvantages, said undergraduate admissions director Emily Engelschall.

Riverside's admissions by exception, she said, tend toward students who were homeschooled, experienced a medical emergency that delayed their coursework, or "come from a foster care environment who've attended 10 different high schools throughout their career."

Even students admitted by exception to UC Riverside must have at least a 3.0 GPA and meet minimum test score cutoffs, said Engelschall — a stricter standard than at other campuses. Those requirements can be waived, however, if a special faculty review committee signs off.

Eddie Comeaux, a professor of higher education at UC Riverside, said such committees sometimes fail to adequately assess whether students they're admitting have the skills and support to succeed at the university.

"Sometimes they become a rubber stamp, and there's not a thoughtful, evidence-based approach," said Comeaux, who chairs the UC-wide faculty panel charged with overseeing admissions policy.

Non-scholarship athletes in more obscure sports can receive less careful review, Comeaux said. "So much of that is under the radar because these are athletes that are not high profile."

At least two people review every application granted admission by exception at UC Riverside, said Engelschall — but that's not true for every campus, an internal UC audit found. In some cases, a single individual makes the selection, according to the June audit, the first of three to examine ways to improve UC's admissions procedures in the wake of Varsity Blues.

A bill pending in the state Legislature aims to address that: Authored by Sacramento Assemblyman Kevin McCarty, it would require that at least three senior administrators sign off on every student admitted by exception to UC and CSU.

UC Santa Cruz: Out-of-staters — and tuition

UC's internal audit also found that campuses are not consistently measuring how many students they admit by exception, and sometimes fail to document the reason for the decision. UC Santa Cruz, for example, admitted about 8% of its entering class by exception in 2018, exceeding the 6% allowed under UC rules.

Michelle Wittingham, associate vice chancellor of enrollment management, said the way the university handled those applications — which were flagged by a reviewer, given a score between 1 and 5, and then lumped in with the regular pool — made it harder to track compliance with the cap. But she added that the university is "going to really be looking closely into that."

UC Santa Cruz has used the program to recruit students from outside California who have strong academic records but didn't take a required class, Wittingham said: "You might be missing a year of English, but we see that you had senior English and got great grades and had strong test scores."

The university is working to increase its population of non-resident students, Whittingham said, both to expose California students to other cultural influences and bring in the extra tuition dollars those students pay. About 86% of the 282 students the campus admitted by exception in 2018 came from outside the state, she said, and "not shockingly, curriculum in other countries is not aligned to UC requirements."

Whittingham took care to emphasize that non-resident students who come in by exception aren't displacing California residents — the number of in-state students, she said, is determined by state funds.

UC-wide: Promoting diversity?

In some ways, admissions by exception may be contributing to campus diversity. California students admitted via the policy in 2018 were more likely to be black than those in the entering class overall — though less likely to be Latino or first-generation. Black students, who are underrepresented at UC compared to their share of California's population, made up about 10% of in-state students admitted by exception, double their share of total admitted students from the state.

At a recent meeting of UC's governing board, some university regents worried that tightening oversight of admissions by exception too much — for example, by requiring more students to submit documents verifying claims they make in their applications — could adversely affect disadvantaged students.

"Folks that are being admitted by exception...might be in the least favorable position to provide a lot of verification," said regents vice-chair Cecilia Estolano. "Those are super-important categories for us to ensure that we're opening access to really amazing, talented people that just don't have opportunities to show that in their high school."

But Wei-Li Sun, an admissions consultant who specializes in helping students apply to UC, says the practice seems less to benefit disadvantaged students overall than to target specific groups.

"You've got your out of state students who bring in money, you've got your athletes who are going to win, and you've got your homeschool students who tend to outperform the regular students, so it makes sense for the UCs to want them," she said.

Bay Area-based admissions counselor Felicia Fahey said she's helped two clients gain admission by exception — one a homeschooled student who attended UC Berkeley, and another a skilled writer who was admitted to UC Davis after a heart surgery that affected her grades.

"(The second student) had clearly overcome this problem and was performing at a really high level," Fahey said.

On basic data, 'surprising' secrecy

Whatever their reasons, some UC campuses are clearly reluctant to share data on admissions by exception. Four months after CalMatters sent public records requests to each of the nine undergraduate campuses seeking information about the number and demographics of students admitted under the policy, only UCLA has provided any documents. UC Riverside and UC Santa Cruz made admissions staff available for interviews.

The other six campuses either failed to respond or said they did not have records that answered any of our questions — even the most basic one about how many students were admitted by exception last year.

When CalMatters followed up, pointing out that UC's own internal audit was examining that question, some campuses agreed to look into our request — but had yet to provide any documents by deadline.

More details could emerge when the university conducts a second internal audit of its admissions over the next six months, followed by an independent state study requested by the Legislature.

Assemblymember Tasha Boerner-Horvath, the San Diego Democrat who asked for the state audit, said she found campuses' lack of documentation "very surprising."

"It's a more subjective admissions process than the rest of admissions," she said. "Is that something that can be theoretically abused? Yes. Are they doing enough due diligence to ensure it's not being misused?"

This story and other higher education coverage are supported by the College Futures Foundation.

UC President Janet Napolitano has said the university will follow the audit's recommendations, which include requiring campuses to track why they admit each student by exception and ensure that multiple people evaluate each file.

While UC says only about 2% of newly enrolled students systemwide enter via the policy, that still amounts to hundreds of students. The university sent acceptance letters to a record 108,178 freshmen for fall 2019, including 71,655 Californians. About 62% of California applicants got in, though not necessarily to their first-choice campus.

This story and other higher education coverage are supported by the College Futures Foundation. is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media venture explaining California's policies and politics. Read more state news from CALmatters here.


Follow the Palo Alto Weekly/Palo Alto Online on Twitter @PaloAltoWeekly and Facebook for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

What is democracy worth to you?
Support local journalism.


4 people like this
Posted by No smoke
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Aug 10, 2019 at 4:40 pm

The different modes of admission standards are:
1) satisfy a-g requirements
2) test-only option
3) exception

So, satisfying #1 and #2 don't mean you get in, they just are minimum requirements. As has been said above, there needs to be a way to admit exceptional students who don't meet those requirements.

#1, a-g, has alternative ways of satisfying the requirements, for example, getting a certain score on an SAT subject test.

This makes this option attainable for some homeschoolers who school through public district programs, and if they take courses that are official a-g courses from accredited programs. There are a number of hurdles:

It can be difficult for homeschoolers to get in to testing centers near them, or to get information about testing centers. Although studies show they do better on average on standardized tests, a lot of homeschoolers are homeschooling so they can spend their time on more independent and advanced educational opportunities. Homeschoolers have a lot of options to take courses that are designed to be a-g, which are vetted by, say, public charters that can grant official a-g credit for those classes. But a child could be taking the exact same class and doing just as well on the work, but not homeschooling through a public district, so they will not get the official credit on their transcript for the exact same course that someone else gets credit for.

Getting that official credit can be very tough for programs, even if they are WASC-accredited organizations that have gone through the difficult a-g approval process for their courses (a-g approval is granted on a course-by-course basis, not by organization). UC can pull the official approval at any time for arbitrary reasons unrelated to the educational program quality.

2) More homeschoolers apply under the test-only option, but it adds to students burdens in a nonsensical way. For example, homeschoolers will have to take subject tests to comply, even if the same children have completed upper level college courses (graded, at accredited institutions) in those subjects already. So, for example, a child who may have gotten an A in multivariable calculus at the local community college or even UC, might still have to take Math2 subject test. It's just a waste of time and money. Some homeschoolers balk at that kind of thing -- they took all those educational risks for a reason.

3) Homeschoolers who apply under the exception are typically those who go on a very, very nontraditional path. Because UC's admit such a small percentage by exception, most people don't want to take the risk unless they are very, very sure of the quality of their application.

I don't want to leave the impression that students choose the above options, they just have to make sure their applications satisfy one of them. If something goes wrong, at least the UC has some discretion to include students who might be excluded for simple administrative mistakes.

3 people like this
Posted by No Smoke
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Aug 12, 2019 at 12:36 pm

I think the way the UCs can calm questions about this is to create more alternatives to satisfy the a-g requirements by studying the common exceptions required by students in the most common groups.

For example, for homeschoolers, they might make it possible to use courses that are designed to fulfill a-g credit, that are frequently otherwise granted a-g credit by public schools for independent study students. They might make it possible for homeschoolers to use more advanced community college courses to satisfy a-g credits so homeschooled students don't have to take unnecessary tests. This already happens, to my understanding, but this should be expanded to take into account the often more advanced work done by students taking UC-transferrable courses and doing well in them.

The kinds of tests accepted could be expanded, so for example, a student could be allowed to satisfy the requirements for a-g by taking CEFR test through an organization that traditionally tests students for, say, foreign college or job certification.

This way, the students who really need the exceptions will not be competing with those who effectively meet them but don't because the UCs haven't expanded the alternative ways students meet them as educational options change in the 21st century.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

'Are they ready for fully innovative Indian food?' Ettan arrives in Palo Alto with chaat, caviar and a secret menu
By Elena Kadvany | 1 comment | 3,779 views

Flying: How to lower your impact
By Sherry Listgarten | 15 comments | 2,706 views

Premarital and Couples: Here Be Dragons!
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 2,186 views

Goodbye toy stores
By Cheryl Bac | 12 comments | 1,715 views

Pseudo-Primary for CA Senate District 13: some thoughts
By Douglas Moran | 3 comments | 1,359 views


Short story writers wanted!

The 34th Annual Palo Alto Weekly Short Story Contest is now accepting entries for Adult, Young Adult and Teen categories. Send us your short story (2,500 words or less) and entry form by March 27, 2020. First, Second and Third Place prizes awarded in each category. Sponsored by Kepler's Books, Linden Tree Books and Bell's Books.

Contest Details