News

Transportation projects to get a boost in proposed budget

City Council's Finance Committee embraces creation of Office of Transportation to implement traffic improvements, parking programs

For years, Palo Alto's efforts to address citizen frustrations about worsening traffic congestion and parking shortages have fallen well short of ambitions and expectations of the City Council, which has been designating transportation as a top priority every year for the past six years.

The city's long-planned expansion of services never took off; its new bike boulevards have garnered a mixed reception from the community; and its residential parking programs remain clunky, inconsistent and frustrating for both customers and City Hall administrators.

With his first proposed budget as city manager, Ed Shikada is hoping to change that. The budget, which the Finance Committee began reviewing Wednesday night, creates an Office of Transportation, a department that will debut with 13.5 positions and that plans to add two more in the coming months. The goal is to give more prominence and power to an operation that up until now was a division in the Department of Planning and Community Environment.

The Finance Committee approved creating the new office, along with increased funding for the Palo Alto Transportation Management Association, the nonprofit charged with reducing the rate of solo commuters.

By breaking transportation out from planning department, Shikada is hoping to give the division both more prominence and more power to get things done. What has previously been primarily a "planning function" will become one that can both plan and implement projects, he said. As such, it will be "significantly greater than it was before," Shikada said.

The committee also approved Shikada's request to add two positions to the new office: a transportation engineer and a parking manager who will help administer the city's multitude of parking programs and its small shuttle program. Shikada is also recruiting for a chief transportation official to head the new office and to help expand the shuttle program.

The city is also preparing to reform its residential parking programs, with the goal of making them more consistent and simpler to administer.

All three council members on the Finance Committee supported the creation of the new office and the additional positions. Councilwoman Alison Cormack cited a recent citizen survey that showed traffic issues topping the list of local concerns.

"It's really on top of everyone's list," Cormack told staff during the meeting. "In general, the community is doing a good job in being patient and you guys are going a good job trying to hold things together and not have them fall apart."

The new office will also be the lead driver of Palo Alto's new transportation work plan, which the Policy and Service Committee approved last week.

The Finance Committee also voted Wednesday to raise the city's contribution to the Palo Alto Transportation Association from the current level of $480,000 to $660,000. The funding is expected to come from higher fees for employee permits to park at public garages and lots. Staff estimated that a 7.5% increase in permit fees would support the greater contribution.

The added investment in transportation is coming at a time when the overall number of positions at City Hall is on the decline. Shikada's budget for fiscal year 2020, which begins on July 1, recommends eliminating eight-and-a-half full-time positions as well as keeping several others vacant for the year to save money.

Even so, the general fund (which funds most basic services, not including utilities) is set to increase from $214.5 million in the current fiscal year to $232.1 million — a 9.5% jump that city officials attribute largely to growing labor costs. The overall budget, which includes utilities, is projected to decrease from $711.2 million to $699.2 million.

The committee also signed off Wednesday on proposed changes to various utility rates, which collectively will add about 5%, or $15.65, to the average monthly utility bill, taking it from $312.15 to $327.80 for all major utilities.

The biggest jump comes in electricity, where the city plans to raise rates by 8% to pay for higher transmission costs, capital investments and new renewable-energy projects. In addition, staff have reported a reduction in electricity usage, which requires the city to spread out the fixed costs of running the utility among fewer customers.

The 8% rate hike will add $2.98 to the average residential electricity bill, taking it from $54.33 to $57.31, according to staff.

Gas rates are also on the rise. The budget calls for raising gas rates by 5%, a change that Utilities Department staff are attributing largely to rising construction costs for gas main replacements and the cross-bore inspection program. The rate change will add $4.91 to the average monthly gas bill, increasing it from $58.48 to $63.39.

The committee will continue its review of the proposed budget on May 23 and conclude it on May 28. The City Council is set to adopt the budget next month.

---

Follow the Palo Alto Weekly/Palo Alto Online on Twitter @PaloAltoWeekly and Facebook for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

What is democracy worth to you?
Support local journalism.

Comments

16 people like this
Posted by Fiscal Baloney
a resident of Crescent Park
on May 16, 2019 at 10:14 am

from the PA Weekly article...
> "...creates an Office of Transportation, a department that will debut with 13.5 positions and that plans to add two more in the coming months."

SERIOUSLY? 15 new city employees (with PERs) to point out the obvious with PowerPoint presentations ad nauseum?

INCREDIBLE. A new 'Department of BS' with additional paid bureaucrats to 'explore and comment on' what nearly every PA resident could convey in one sentence?

IRONIC. The PACC promotes office overdevelopment and then the CPA creates a new division to address its aftermath?

The City of Palo Alto must have an incredible war chest of available funding...from all of the developer fees and backroom dealing.



6 people like this
Posted by Resident
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on May 16, 2019 at 11:27 am

This is crazy. Throwing more money away by employing more people to implement stale ideas that are not going to work anyway is not going to help.

We need innovative ideas, not butts sitting on seats. We need payment apps to pay on our phones. We need electronic signs at garages. We need parking meters (that can be paid by phone). We need parking lots at highway offramps with dedicated shuttles to downtown and other business areas. We need better shuttle services to secondary schools. We need shuttles to Caltrain stations.

These sorts of things is where the money should be spent.


6 people like this
Posted by Clueless Reader
a resident of Professorville
on May 16, 2019 at 12:49 pm

The 2 previous comments indicate that new employees are being hired. My understanding is that these are mostly existing employees who will be transferred from Planning to the new department.


6 people like this
Posted by chris
a resident of University South
on May 16, 2019 at 12:49 pm

Baloney,

It is not 15 new positions, it is 2. Please reread.

These positions could be easily paid for if the city charged for parking at a rate that reflects its value.


3 people like this
Posted by who pays?
a resident of Midtown
on May 16, 2019 at 1:42 pm

Am I mistaken that the money comes primarily from residents and from employees?

--higher fees for employee permits
--raised rates for gas and electricity
--the general fund
No money from developers or businesses?

More "programs" and staff changes. No *actual* traffic mitigation.


5 people like this
Posted by Online Name
a resident of Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on May 16, 2019 at 3:39 pm

Please, no more wasteful spending on road diets, road furniture, bulb-outs, bollards to restrict traffic flow at a time when all the proposed and pkanned expansions and addition of MILLIONS if sq feet of office space will add tens if thousands of NEW commuters to our roads, our parking garages, etc,

When will businesses start paying their fair share??


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields


Be the first to know

Get the latest headlines sent straight to your inbox every day.

Nationally renowned Indian restaurant expanding to Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 3 comments | 2,985 views

Cap On? Cap Off? Recycling Bottles is Confusing
By Laura Stec | 34 comments | 1,349 views

Summer travel: Is anything changing?
By Sherry Listgarten | 14 comments | 1,341 views

Premarital and Couples: "Our Deepest Fear" by Marianne Williamson
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,237 views