News

Palo Alto Unified teachers, senior managers to get 2% raise

One of two agreements gives 'me too' raises for principals and school psychologists, among others

The Palo Alto school board unanimously approved 2% raises for its teachers union and senior managers on Tuesday night.

The three-year labor agreement with the Palo Alto Educators Association provides an ongoing 2% raise — though compensation will be renegotiated each year — and a 2% one-time bonus this year. This year's raise, effective retroactive to Jan. 7, 2019, will cost the district $1.2 million and $2.4 million in each of the following years. The off-schedule 2% bonus is based on employees' salaries after the raise is applied and will cost the district $2.4 million.

The new agreement replaces the expired collective bargaining agreement, which was thought to be the district's first-ever multiyear union contract and heralded at the time as a successful change for Palo Alto Unified and its bargaining units. Then, senior leadership's failure to formally notify the teachers and employee unions that the district planned to exercise its option to reopen negotiations, as required by the contracts, with the intent of canceling a 3% raise in the face of budget cuts, cost the district $4.4 million in unbudgeted raises.

By also approving a revised memorandum of understanding with the Palo Alto Management Association (PAMA) on Tuesday, the board has now tied salary increases for senior administrators to those negotiated with the teachers union for the next five years. (The memorandum does not apply to members of the district's executive cabinet: the superintendent, assistant superintendent, deputy superintendent and chief business officer.)

School board members who had criticized this practice in the past, known as "me too" raises, explained Tuesday why their thinking on this changed, primarily because the agreement was a worthwhile tradeoff in light of unrest among a senior management group ready to unionize.

President Jennifer DiBrienza expressed regret at the board's failure to explain that reasoning to the public, however. No one on the school board raised a question or made a comment about the five-year lock-step pay increase when it was discussed on April 23.

"It's a good reminder for me that even though we know we spent a lot of time ... over several (closed) sessions really talking this through and weighing different reasons why we might do something, the community doesn't know that," said DiBrienza, who was absent at that board meeting.

In a lengthy prepared statement, Vice President Todd Collins called the revised memorandum of understanding a "meaningful win." He described why he came to see the creation of a performance-based compensation system as challenging to accomplish for the Palo Alto Management Association, a non-unionized group that represents 85 principals, assistant principals, directors, coordinators, school psychologists and other administrators. The group "resisted" the idea, he said, and the district has also been limited in its ability to make big changes in the wake of high leadership turnover.

"PAMA leaders were telling us that they may unionize, which would significantly and likely permanently change our ability to work with them as part of our management team — a very big negative in my view," he said. "Our capacity to make changes is limited, and we need to focus on the things that will have the biggest impact on student achievement. If we did this, we'd need to do it well, and that means there are other things we aren't doing."

He noted that the district has started to shift the way its highest-level employees are paid — including having individual contracts with some senior leadership and eliminating perks like automatic raises, degree stipends and car allowances — and hopes that those shifts will at some point lead to a partial or total replacement of the "me too" practice.

Austin and PAMA leadership agreed to pare down the memorandum of understanding from nine pages to one, eliminating details on hiring and grievance procedures, in the hopes of encouraging partnership rather than opposition between the district and its senior managers.

---

Follow the Palo Alto Weekly/Palo Alto Online on Twitter @PaloAltoWeekly and Facebook for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

What is democracy worth to you?
Support local journalism.

Comments

7 people like this
Posted by Cover-up Culture
a resident of Community Center
on May 15, 2019 at 5:10 pm

The school board is in bed w the teachers union. So is the PAMA. Too bad our esteemed publication seems to be right there along w them.

The teacher's union snookered the board and district out of an unbudgeted $4 million just last year for raises - and now what happens - they get a raise! Without any accountability or any performance evaluations.

When they were already the highest paid at @20k/student/year in the state.

Let's make sure their managers will be cheering them on by tying their compensation together.


11 people like this
Posted by Lewis
a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on May 16, 2019 at 7:26 am

@cover up. PAUSD is NOT the highest paid in the state. One need to only look next door to our neighbors in MVLA who make more. Get the facts correct.


3 people like this
Posted by Green Acres parent
a resident of Green Acres
on May 16, 2019 at 3:40 pm

Green Acres parent is a registered user.

@Lewis,

MVLA is a high school district. High school teachers are generally paid more than elementary and middle school teachers. Unions set their members' salaries based on education and tenure, resulting in relatively little difference between elementary, middle, and high school teachers' salaries. This makes it hard to compare salaries between MVLA and PAUSD. It also makes it hard for PAUSD to attract and retain good high school teachers despite the fact that the average PAUSD teacher's salary is high.


Like this comment
Posted by Lewis
a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on May 17, 2019 at 9:18 am

@green acres yet those teachers have identical degrees and are all public school teachers. The point is and still remains PAUSD is not the highest paid in the state. Thanks for trying tho!


4 people like this
Posted by Green Acres parent
a resident of Green Acres
on May 17, 2019 at 1:46 pm

Green Acres parent is a registered user.

@Lewis,

There's no need for snark. My point was just that it's hard to compare salaries between high school districts and unified school districts.

Salary data is public - see Web Link - so let's dig a little deeper. I scanned through the unified school districts and Palo Alto appears to be the third highest paid for the 2017/18 school year. The average schedule salary paid by each of the top three unified school districts was:
- $123,191 - St. Helena Unified
- $110,289 - Carmel Unified
- $109,894 - Palo Alto Unified

The average schedule salary paid by each of the top three high school districts was:
- $132,580 - Mountain View-Los Altos Union High
- $109,866 - Los Gatos-Saratoga Joint Union High
- $105,873 - San Mateo Union High

Salaries tend to be correlated with cost of living and these are all expensive areas, so this isn't surprising.


3 people like this
Posted by Lewis
a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on May 17, 2019 at 2:53 pm

Cool, so like I said, PAUSD is not the highest paid in the state. Now an interesting stat would be salary compared to actual cost of living. I bet you PAUSD would drop in those rankings real fast.


Like this comment
Posted by Old Joe
a resident of Barron Park
on May 17, 2019 at 3:50 pm

Unfortunate result.
Poor planning and foregone conclusion given the negotiating parties biases.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields


Don't be the last to know

Get the latest headlines sent straight to your inbox every day.

What Would it Take to Get Tech Companies to Move Jobs Out of the Region and Is This a Good Idea?
By Steve Levy | 18 comments | 1,339 views

A Power Play
By Sherry Listgarten | 9 comments | 1,196 views

College Match
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 922 views

Palo Alto's Taverna to expand next door
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 865 views

Piles of artwork
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 469 views

 

Vote now!

It's time once again to cast your vote for the best places to eat, drink, shop and spend time in Palo Alto. Voting is open now through May 27. Watch for the results of our 2019 Best Of contest on Friday, July 19.

Vote