News

A journey of 9,500 miles. Why recyclables are heading overseas to Asia.

Palo Alto rethinks how to dispose of its waste because of environmental problems overseas

A GreenWaste of Palo Alto residential solid-waste driver makes his rounds in south Palo Alto. Photo by Veronica Weber.

View this story alongside photos slideshows, videos, interactive charts and more on our Atavist page.

Ricardo Hernandez was finishing up his collection rounds as a solid-waste driver for GreenWaste of Palo Alto recently when he spotted a black trash bin overflowing with garbage bags.

"Most of the stuff in these bags is recyclables and food waste," said Hernandez, shaking his head and tossing the excess trash bags into the truck.

One only needs to take a tour of the Sunnyvale Materials Recovery and Transfer (SMaRT) Station, where Palo Alto's trash is delivered for sorting before being sent to the landfill, to understand Hernandez's concern. There are plastic water bottles, cardboard boxes, yogurt containers, soda cans, orange peels, apple cores and other recyclables and compostables mixed in the mound of garbage on the floor.

On average, 70% of what Palo Altans toss into their black garbage bins is recyclable and compostable, according to the city's latest Waste Characterization Study.

At the SMaRT Station, these salvageable materials are separated from the garbage. It's an extra step in the city's recycling process that has helped divert tons of waste from landfills. Out of the 27,000 tons of waste processed at the SMaRT station from Palo Alto last year, over 8,500 tons (approximately 30%) were diverted.

This extra sorting step is just one of the many tactics Palo Alto is employing in its ambitious Zero Waste Plan to divert 90% of its waste by 2021. It's a goal that's well ahead of the state's target of 75%.

The plan includes incentives that encourage residents and businesses to reduce their weekly garbage loads; proposals to ban certain types of single-use plastics and foodware items; and an ordinance that would regulate construction and demolition debris, which currently makes up 44% of Palo Alto's total landfill disposal.

"I think we realized a long time ago, that landfill space is a limited resource," said Daniel North, district manager of Morgan Hill's Kirby Canyon Recycling and Disposal Facility. "It's in everyone's interest to make sure that as little material goes to the landfill as possible."

But as Palo Alto works to achieve zero waste, there are new environmental obstacles arising from changes in global recycling standards that the city must consider since it currently sends about 75% of its recyclables overseas.

"We're struggling here with looking ahead at the ultimate solution and yet trying to do something in the immediate future," said Phil Bobel, Palo Alto's assistant director of public works.

Landfills: A new resource?

Every day, after 750 tons of garbage from Palo Alto, Mountain View and Sunnyvale is processed and sorted at the SMaRT station, the remaining refuse is compacted and loaded onto a fleet of 30-40 trucks, which head to the Kirby Canyon Recycling and Disposal Facility in Morgan Hill, which is operated by the company Waste Management.

Hidden behind rolling hills of serpentine grasses overlooking U.S. Highway 101, bulldozers at the landfill site push the debris onto a flattened mound dubbed "the pancake," pounding and grinding everything from discarded mattresses, filing cabinets, laminate floor boards, VHS tapes, estate-planning paperwork, and lots and lots of plastic bags. For odor control, the mound is then covered with alternative daily cover — often a blend of soil, sludge, recovered plastics and ground-up construction debris.

Underground are a series of methane wells connected to a large pipe and blowers that vacuum up the gas, which is then channeled upward and burned off by a flare, resulting in carbon dioxide and water and inspected annually for air contaminants.

Though the technology can be seen as a feat in managing waste and maintaining clean emissions, North sees the process as a wasted opportunity. He said the company's Altamont landfill, in comparison, has an onsite power plant that converts methane gas into renewable energy and is an example of what could be done at Kirby Canyon.

As cities further reduce waste with increased recycling and composting habits, North said landfills will have to convert from mere dumping grounds into sustainable energy sources.

"The world is changing," he said. "We'd like to see less material go in the landfill and more of it be diverted, and that's why these facilities are adapting over time to be able to handle that."

Recycling: Contamination problems

Just outside the Port of Oakland, up to 100 trucks carrying cargo containers pull up next to the Ever Reach Logistics processing center, where a team of eight inspectors clad in yellow vests and hard hats from the China Certification and Inspection Group await to inspect shipments headed overseas to China.

Inside each of these containers are about 30 bales of corrugated cardboard — think Amazon and moving boxes retrieved from recycling facilities. Directed by the Chinese government, the inspectors use a strict cardboard-screening process. They snap photos, remove the bales and scrutinize each one up close, sometimes even using X-rays to make sure each bale contains less than 0.5% contamination from outside materials, defined as anything from mixed paper to plastic bags to too much moisture. Bales that don't meet the 99.5% clean metric are rejected and sent back to recycle buyers.

"Now that they've dropped to a half percent, it's darn near impossible to meet, but we're doing everything that we can to meet it," said Emily Hanson, director of business development and communications for GreenWaste Recovery, Palo Alto's recycling sorter.

The strict new standards, which began in March 2018, are part of China's National Sword policy that has halted international imports of cardboard, mixed paper and plastics while the country adopts more environmental protections to end its role as the world's dumping ground.

"It's thrown the entire global recycling market into chaos, and we're talking the whole developed world," said Mark Bowers, Sunnyvale Solid Waste Programs division manager, who oversees the Sunnyvale SMaRT station.

In 2017, the United States exported 12.8 billion pounds of fiber and plastic products to China. In 2018, that number dropped to 8.1 billion. It is expected to keep dropping as China outlines more restrictions. This has left domestic recycling operations scrambling to adapt and find new markets for the materials.

Contamination is the problem everyone is trying to solve. It's a dirty word in the recycling industry. In Palo Alto, bales of cardboard and mixed paper, which make up roughly 70% of the city's exported recyclables, can become tainted instantly by poor sorting in the city's single-stream program, which mixes all materials together. Liquids in soda bottles, half-filled jars of peanut butter, oily residue from takeout containers can ruin potential fiber shipments.

In an effort to combat "dirty sorting," Palo Alto recently launched its Recycle-Ready campaign, imploring residents and businesses to remove food waste and liquids before tossing cans and bottles into bins.

At the GreenWaste Material Recovery Facility in San Jose, which sorts 18,000-19,000 tons of Palo Alto's recyclable goods every year, six new optical sorters are being installed to better handle the enormous volume of mixed-paper products and make them marketable for the changing international buyer demand.

VIDEO: Step inside the GreenWaste Material Recovery Facility in San Jose

In 2018, GreenWaste stopped sending recycled paper products to China altogether. Because there are few paper pulping mills operating in the United States, GreenWaste now sends paper to Korea, Vietnam, India, Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia and Taiwan. Even with the China restrictions, waste paper is still the Port of Oakland's largest export, making up 18% of all exports last year. That equates to 110,400, 20-foot containers shipped every year.

One reason why so much recycling is shipped overseas is because many containers arrive in the United States carrying imports and would otherwise be empty on the return trip home.

"As a recycling industry, we've just taken advantage of the fact that the shipping containers need to go back," Hanson said. "That doesn't mean that we know exactly what happens once it leaves our shores."

This is a reality many recycling sorting facilities are coming to terms with now that the markets have shifted to mainly Southeast Asian countries with questionable environmental practices.

"We're essentially relinquishing control of those materials to those (countries) that don't have the environmental policies that we do and don't have the same tracking that we do in some cases," Daniel North of Kirby Canyon said.

No one understands this better than Palo Alto resident Bob Wenzlau, who helped launch Palo Alto's curbside recycling program in the 1970s. Most recently, he spoke with city leaders and representatives from GreenWaste who then crafted the city's new Environmental and Social Impacts of Processing Recyclable Materials guidelines.

"It's really urgent that we start waking up to this new reality," Wenzlau said. "I can almost say that there is no single destination in Southeast Asia that would satisfy either our basic environmental or basic social standards, period."

The guidelines direct the hauling company to establish a tracking system that informs residents where plastic and paper ultimately end up. GreenWaste Recovery has appointed its director of sustainability to take the lead and intends to begin preliminary reporting later this year, working in tandem with the waste hauler and the San Jose recovery facility.

"Sustainability is in Palo Alto's blood, and this where we can make our mark," Wenzlau said.

There's a reason for concern: 77% of the world's mismanaged plastic waste (plastic that is at high risk of making its way into watersheds and oceans due to poor disposal practices) comes from the same countries to which United States sent 1.3 billion tons of plastic last year, according to the article "Plastic Pollution," published in Our World In Data.

Unlike plastic bottles and milk jugs, which are mostly processed within the United States, plastic wrap, take-out containers, plastic drink cups, coffee lids and all plastics marked No. 3-7, don't have any domestic markets and are the biggest source of plastic exports.

"I view the numbered triangles (used to identify recyclable plastics) as a gigantic marketing gimmick put out by the virgin plastics producers to give consumers the impression that all plastics are recyclable," Bowers said. "They're not."

As part of Palo Alto's zero-waste goals to help curb the volume of plastic use, Bobel noted that city staff will be bringing forward the first of three proposed ordinances to ban certain kinds of single-use plastics before the City Council on May 20. If approved, the first phase of the Foodware Packaging Reduction Plan would ban plastic straws, utensils, drink stirrers and plugs and require alternative compostable or reusable objects in their place.

"The ultimate solution is waste reduction, especially for those single-use items," said Eric Cissna, environmental outreach coordinator for GreenWaste of Palo Alto. "We just need to stop generating them in the first place"

Zero waste: Finding a home for it

Michael Gross, director of sustainability at Zanker Recycling, beams with pride as he guides a tour of the 168-acre recycling and composting operation in San Jose. On the site of a former landfill, massive machinery grinds lumber, crushes concrete, plucks asphalt shingles and sorts scrap metal from demolition debris.

In the middle of the site, 16 anaerobic digesters of the ZeroWaste Energy Development Company convert Palo Alto's and San Jose's yard and food waste into renewable biogas energy and compost. Next door, a 240-foot conveyor belt churns and sorts 16 types of construction and demolition debris (C&D) materials at 60 tons an hour.

"I'm just like the best-looking garbage man you've ever seen," Gross laughs as he talks about the scale of his operation. "I'm the only one out here doing this. That C&D curbside line ... nobody in the industry has something that big."

Last year the C&D operation processed 185,000 tons of material and diverted 80% of it from the landfill.

Palo Alto has taken notice. Roughly 44% of all landfill waste from the city is composed of construction and demolition debris from the numerous development projects across town. The city staff intends to bring an ordinance requiring the deconstruction and separation of materials at the source before City Council on May 20. The proposal would make mandatory the sorting of salvage from residential and commercial demolition projects, which would then be sent to the Zanker facility.

"We think those deconstruction-related initiatives are some of the largest short-term initiatives in terms of being able to impact diversion and impact waste," said Ron Arp, zero waste manager for Palo Alto. "It's not only waste diversion, keeping it out of landfills, it's a better use."

Gross agreed.

"The big thing about garbage recycling is getting rid of the stuff right and making sure everything you take in you get rid of," he said. "You've got to find a home for it."

Related content:

Weekly journalists discuss this issue on an episode of "Behind the Headlines," now available on our YouTube channel and podcast page.

City staff: Palo Alto needs residents to do better job of sorting, cleaning recyclables

Guest Opinion: Recycling a 'good deed' that punishes southeast Asia

---

Follow the Palo Alto Weekly/Palo Alto Online on Twitter @PaloAltoWeekly and Facebook for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

About the video: Take a look inside the Sunnyvale SMaRT station which processes 750 tons of municipal solid waste per day from the cities of Palo Alto, Mountain View and Sunnyvale and recovers 31% of compost and recyclables from the landfill.

What is democracy worth to you?
Support local journalism.

Comments

30 people like this
Posted by Re-Use That Banana Peel
a resident of Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Apr 12, 2019 at 8:59 am

We need to develop recyclables into alternative energy sources...not so much plastics as this may pose an environmental hazard but organic waste material.

I've always been impressed with how Dr. Brown was successful in converting his nuclear-powered DeLorean to bio-fuel (aka produce material wastes). If this can be accomplished with a complex Flux-Capacitor design, we most certainly have the technology to apply this process to conventional-powered mobiles.


17 people like this
Posted by Don't Disrupt The Flow
a resident of another community
on Apr 12, 2019 at 12:48 pm

When Asia says no more to exported recyclables, then we must consider an alternative.

Until then, keep those barges headed out their way. It provides jobs for the grateful locals.


3 people like this
Posted by sophie
a resident of another community
on Apr 12, 2019 at 1:52 pm

For some folks, waste needs to be disposed, for others, waste is resource in a wrong place. There are businesses established based on recycling the waste material, such as the recycled plastics are used to make printers' housing, recycled metals are used in mother boards. Return of Investment is the only thing it matters.


2 people like this
Posted by Polly Wanacracker
a resident of Professorville
on Apr 12, 2019 at 4:27 pm

"Re-Use That Banana Peel"

Recycle it into a slipper.


12 people like this
Posted by Marc
a resident of Midtown
on Apr 13, 2019 at 8:54 am

I think this is pretty funny. In the old days, Palo Alto had clean recyclable streams. Separate boxes for paper, cardboard, glass and metal, etc. High value, no contamination.

Then greenwaste convinced the city to go to the large mixed bins so that greenwaste could save money collecting the waste. And the city paid for the initial cost of the bins. All so that greenwaste could reduce THEIR costs.

Now we find out that no one wants the contaminated waste and it is expensive and hard to separate out.

Why don't we clawback the bonuses we gave to the city employees and city manager for their wonderful service and short cited thinking that got us into this situation.

/marc


17 people like this
Posted by Just fix it
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Apr 13, 2019 at 3:50 pm

@Marc,
Not only did we used to have well-sorted recyclables, we also used to put clean items in recycling until we were told by our waste management that we SHOULDN'T clean things before putting them in recycling because of water. I read this to incredulous members of the household and we started putting items in without rinsing.

I do not mind going back to sorting and rinsing. Just tell us what to do. And sheesh, stop talking about the problem as if it just happened. Someone goofed, it can be fixed.


7 people like this
Posted by Just fix it
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Apr 13, 2019 at 3:51 pm

But maybe we should be keeping all the easily recycled aluminum and glass here anyway...


4 people like this
Posted by merry
a resident of Palo Alto Hills
on Apr 14, 2019 at 11:35 am

merry is a registered user.

Another fraud that became an industry! Remember when we were issued burlap sacks for our cans?
Now it’s complicated expensive and does not work.


Like this comment
Posted by I like bananas
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Apr 14, 2019 at 3:40 pm

Seriously - there are vitamins in banana peels. Try washing a banana before eating it, and then putting the washed peel into boiling water, allowing it to seep and become a flavorful tea. I tried it and it's great. Must be done after eating the banana though. Don't think it would work as well, when peel turns brown.


Like this comment
Posted by eileen
a resident of College Terrace
on Apr 14, 2019 at 9:11 pm

eileen is a registered user.

@I like Bananas, stop being ridiculous and pay attention to the issue.
Other than eating bananas, do you have a real solution this is problem?


Like this comment
Posted by Mellow Yellow
a resident of College Terrace
on Apr 15, 2019 at 8:19 am

> Try washing a banana before eating it, and then putting the washed peel into boiling water, allowing it to seep and become a flavorful tea.

Those who remember the late 1960s will also recall the concept of scraping the inner lining of the banana peel & smoking it in lieu of marijuana.

Donovan even wrote a song about it...'Mellow Yellow'.

Countless people tried this & found that marijuana had a much more profound and noticeable effect.

In any event, whether tea or smoke is made from the discarded banana peel, you still have some residual garbage. Probably best to just toss it in the garden & let the residual decompose organically into the ground.


4 people like this
Posted by Fossil fueled consumerism
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Apr 15, 2019 at 8:51 am

Fossil fueled consumerism is a registered user.

We use fossil fuels to ship cheap manufactured goods over thousands of miles of ocean to "save" money. We ship tons of packaging and dirty waste back to those same countries to manage our waste. It would be great if US companies paid US citizens a decent wage to make stuff closer to home, pay a little more for labor, and manage our waste here. We would then have control to truly manage environmental impacts (assuming we really want to--I do.), create jobs, reduce fossil fuel emissions from long-distance shipping to minimize enormous long-term unmeasured costs of climate change.

Cheap stuff from overseas is not cheaper if you consider the long-term cost of the environmental damage of this kind of foolishness. It's time for us to clean up our own messes and own the true cost of our consumerism.

Short-term profit motive is the enemy. Greed truly is a vice. Our children and grandchildren will thank us for considering their future as we make our consumer and waste management choices.

Reduce what we buy. Reuse what we can. Recycle as much as we can. Most importantly, reduce our fossil fuel footprint. That is the single most important thing we can all do for our kids. My beloved grandmother who died forty years ago would be appalled to see how we wastefully are living today. We can do better. We HAVE done better.


1 person likes this
Posted by Chris G Zaharias
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Apr 15, 2019 at 12:35 pm

Chris G Zaharias is a registered user.

It seems to me that the most environmentally friendly things for PA to do would be to reopen the landfill. As I understand it, the knock against landfills is that *poorly-managed ones* are conduits to plastics and pollution entering the environment, the ocean primarily. If PA's landfill continues to be well-managed, that risk is largely mitigated whereas it's not if our trash ends up in SE Asia.


Like this comment
Posted by Another Use For Expended Plastics
a resident of another community
on Apr 15, 2019 at 8:02 pm

> Other than eating bananas, do you have a real solution this is problem?

Bananas, apples and oranges are the most popular fruits in America & I have the utmost appreciation for them.

Their skins are bio-degradable, the fruits provide healthful nutrition & are easy to carry in a brown bag lunch.

They are also popular (along with cherries) as slot machine symbols.

Back to topic...isn't ironic how we import tons of plastic products from Asia only to send much of them back as recyclable materials?

The oceanic shipping lanes are inundated by this back & forth transport of plastics.

One possible solution would be to convert the plastic into viable construction & building materials to meet the expanded housing & office demands of the SF Bay Area & elsewhere. This would in turn reduce global steel production & the pollution that emanates from its manufacturing process.

Plastic could also be used for building bridges & modern sports arenas. It's flexible, strong and the pigments could be added to into the epoxying process so exterior painting would now become a thing of the past!

Plus...plastic doesn't rust.

We have the technology and the engineering know-how.


2 people like this
Posted by Vettura
a resident of College Terrace
on Apr 16, 2019 at 9:24 am

City needs to develop volunteer network, to hunt down any business who uses disposable plastic in their business that cannot be recycled in the US, setup initiatives to ban them or tax them to make it economically not viable. Eventually the countries who use or produce these plastics needs to pay recycling cost.


4 people like this
Posted by Mark
a resident of another community
on Jun 11, 2019 at 10:44 pm

In Australia we have a volunteer initiative called Clean Up Australia day. This is where everyone from kids to adults give up their time to clean up waste in their local community. The event is one day each year for anywhere between 4 hours to all day, depending on how much time the volunteer can spare.
It is amazing how much can be done even over a few hours.
Web Link


Like this comment
Posted by Resident 2
a resident of Barron Park
on Jun 13, 2019 at 6:35 pm

Follow the money.
What City staff did on Monday is do what they have always done..they bundled two separate action items into one. The first item was to get rid of single use plastic foodware items and replace it with biodegradable items. A sound idea,with no opposition. Especially after the presentation by the girlscouts. Sales 101, pull on the heart strings.

The second part, which was mandatory deconstruction, should not have been bundled together.
What the City did was make it mandatory to use it's franchised dumpsters ( supplied by Green Waste of course) to load up house demolishion debris. Here is the clincher:: The city splits the fee with Green Waste. At about $1000+ per 20 cubic yard dumpster these fees will add up quick. This is called a kickback, They eleminated the competition by using a monopoly. Even if a contractor self hauls, they are under scrutiny when dumping at Zanker ( Green Waste). Green Waste judges the load of self haulers and can deny the load. This is called conflict of interest. The fox is watching the hen house.

What most folks need to understand is there is not a big market for this material, and the majority ends up in the dump.

Also there is huge incentive for City staff to implement these programs. I am sure there was some kind of grant out there that was used to make this happen. Most likely the plan was shaped to meet the grant critera. Theb to convince the public they Pull a few heart strings ( saving the planet, children safety, ect...) And voila a new public program that will ensure City staff members have job security and a hefty pension to go along with it.

This technique has been used on other projects, for example; the bike boulavard on Ross Rd. I know one of the major concerns in Palo Alto is the City Pension Deficit. Programs like this add to the pension problem.










4 people like this
Posted by Resident Recycler
a resident of Palo Alto High School
on Jun 15, 2019 at 6:50 am

To "Another Use For Expended Plastics" from Another Community -
We can't use these plastics for building materials because when they burn, the smoke is massive (unlike other building materials), and extremely toxic (more so than wood). There are already concerns regarding toxicity using certain recycled man-made materials in general. This is why many manufacturers put statements on furniture and stuffed animals saying "Made from all new materials".
I'm not talking about restoring and reusing wood and metals from old homes, but the newer developed plastics made from petrochemicals.
Styrofoam is another bad one - it should never have been invented.
Just try not to buy things packaged in plastic, and send letters to companies to make a change. I've sent many letters to Walmart, Ranch99, and Walgreens to stop using Styrofoam as egg cartons, and for take-out foods (Ranch).
If they receive enough letters from consumers, they will make the change. It takes time, but it works.



12 people like this
Posted by Make Better Use Of Transport
a resident of Crescent Park
on Jun 15, 2019 at 7:26 am

Why not simply enlist the empty freighters returning to China with these waste products? They can then drop them off in SE Asia prior to reloading their various manufactured goods bound for the USA.


8 people like this
Posted by Why Stop Now?
a resident of Mountain View
on Jun 15, 2019 at 2:16 pm

I recently returned from SE Asia & the people involved in the recycling of American trash look forward to each shipment. It is almost like Christmas morning as they enthusiastically wait for the garbage to be unloaded from the various refuse trucks.

Once unloaded, they scramble to the dumpsite and begin separating the recyclables.

That said, we should continue sending our recyclables to SE Asia as it is greatly appreciated. In many respects it is a humanitarian gesture of good will.


6 people like this
Posted by Resident Recycler
a resident of Palo Alto High School
on Jun 16, 2019 at 3:49 am

To Make Better Use of Transport -
I hope you are joking.
The Asian shippers have been dumping their plastics and untreated waste into our oceans for decades. They are just now seeing the results.

To "Why Stop Now"
You post is utter BS.
Where exactly did you live in SE Asia?
I lived in SE Asia for 5 years and trash was a HUGE problem.
Chinese entrepreneurs are secretly bringing in shipping containers of plastic waste and trying to hide them in Palm oil and rubber plantations all over the country, and in southern Thailand as well. It has caused horrible pollution to the many rivers which run throughout the plantations. Many of these rivers provide the only source of water to many villages (washing, cooking, and irrigating their crops).
Additionally, some of these uneducated people tried to burn the plastic and then villagers became ill. Schools were closed because children and teachers became sick.
These people have no way to deal with this toxic waste.
The governments say that they will now try to apprehend and prosecute those responsible for bringing these shipping containers into Malaysia via Port Klang.
The only country I was not able to visit was Vietnam and the Philippians.
I can only guess that they are dealing with the same woes.
What you have posted is just plain wrong and mean.


4 people like this
Posted by Education And Restraint
a resident of Barron Park
on Jun 16, 2019 at 7:19 am

Couldn't these SE Asian countries develop an internal environmental protection agency to educate their inhabitants on how to properly recycle disposables?

The Chinese ships should not be dumping recyclables into the ocean if they are being paid to deliver them to SE Asia. That is just plan wrong.

Nothing wrong with exporting the trash. It's the overseas transporters not delivering it and environmental ignorance at the various recycling sites creating the problems.


2 people like this
Posted by Recycle For Constructive Purposes
a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on Jun 16, 2019 at 12:57 pm

If the SE Asian recyclers had access to additional technical support and structural engineering expertise they could convert some of this trash into building materials for their residential dwellings.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

All your news. All in one place. Every day.

From Tokyo to Cupertino: Afuri Ramen's first California location debuts tonight
By Elena Kadvany | 2 comments | 3,217 views

Disposing of Disposables
By Sherry Listgarten | 16 comments | 1,598 views

Couples Counseling, Al Pacino Style
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,343 views

Anonymous Sources: Facebook and YouTube suppressing important questions and discussion
By Douglas Moran | 1 comment | 171 views