Editorial: A new Cubberley in sight | News | Palo Alto Online |

News

Editorial: A new Cubberley in sight

After decades of neglect and failed planning efforts, a plan is rapidly emerging

In order for all area residents to have important local information on the coronavirus health emergency, Palo Alto Online has lifted its pay meter and is providing unlimited access to its website. We need your support to continue our important work. Please join your neighbors and become a subscribing member today.

The former Cubberley High School site at 4000 Middlefield Road, close to Palo Alto's southern border and likely the most valuable piece of publicly owned real estate in the city, has been waiting a long time for the dawning of a new day.

The school was closed by the school district in 1979 when decreasing enrollment led to the decision to downsize to two high schools. Since then, in a complex lease agreement between the city of Palo Alto and the school district, more than $150 million has been paid by the city to the school for the use of the site as a community center and in exchange for the district's agreement not to sell off any more of its school sites.

It now stands as a shrine to government ineffectiveness — a 65-year-old set of deteriorating buildings that is the equivalent of an old shed occupying a residential parcel in Old Palo Alto.

In late 2014, the city wisely used its leverage to begin weaning the school district from the cash cow that Cubberley had become by limiting the lease's renewal to just five years and requiring that a plan be developed for the future of the site.

Now, thanks to that pressure, there is finally momentum behind a complete redesign and phased reconstruction of these prime 43 acres (the 35 acres associated with the old high school plus seven acres of the adjacent Greendell School and a school site at 525 San Antonio Road currently leased to the private Athena Academy). The city owns eight acres of the parcel (the tennis courts and some classrooms) while the school district owns the remainder, including the playing fields. But with the lease, the city operates the entire 35-acre Cubberley site.

Many discussions have taken place over the years, including a 2012 effort by a citizens committee that produced an 800-page report. That ended in failure because of a combination of a school board incapable of making a decision beyond wanting to keep all options open for reopening Cubberley as a school site and no city leadership or appetite for forcing the issue. Instead, the decaying buildings have been subleased by the city to a wide variety of programs and individuals and occupied by city staff.

With the lease again coming up for renewal at the end of this year, last June the city of Palo Alto and the school district agreed to share the cost of a $600,000 planning process led by Louisiana-based Concordia, the firm that in nine months developed the plan for rebuilding New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina.

In less than a year, Concordia has accomplished more than what previous attempts have failed to do in decades. Hundreds of Palo Altans have participated in one or more of three planning meetings conducted in September, November and January — more people than have engaged on any public process in memory.

The Concordia process, which uses hands-on small-group exercises designed to suss out ideas and build consensus, is moving at a speed Palo Altans are unaccustomed to, with the intent of finishing a draft master plan with several design alternatives, cost estimates and phasing scenarios by this fall.

So far, the early outlines envision the complete demolition of the existing buildings and development of what's being called a "shared village" where facilities such as gyms, a pool, theater, a health and wellness center and studios would be located in the middle, where they could be shared by a potential future high school or middle school, if needed, and by the community. Some form of affordable, subsidized multi-story housing, for teachers or others, is expected to be included. The large outdoor spaces and playing fields would remain and the usable space would be increased by constructing two-to-four story buildings and putting parking underground or in garages.

A "final" meeting on May 9 will seek to get public feedback on design work now being done by the consultants, after which review will shift to the City Council and school board.

If there is a danger in this fast-moving process, it is that it risks focusing too much on input from the several hundred people who have had time to be involved thus far. They tend to be older, retired residents who are neighbors of or currently utilize the Cubberley facility. It is important to hear from younger families who will be the primary users of this new campus by the time it is completed and from other community members who don't wish to or can't attend meetings.

Implementing any plan will require broad community support since funding will largely need to come from bond measures passed by voters. We hope the city and Concordia make sure they lay the foundation for that support through effective public outreach in the months ahead.

The work to date is impressive, inspiring and visionary, and we look forward to it becoming more concrete over the next six months. Cubberley is an important community asset that is finally getting the attention it deserves.

Related content:

Watch the Feb. 8 "Behind the Headlines" webcast in which Palo Alto City Councilwoman Alison Cormack joins Weekly journalists to the planning effort to redevelop Cubberely.

New Cubberley vision comes together

School board formalizes desires for Cubberley

---

Follow the Palo Alto Weekly/Palo Alto Online on Twitter @PaloAltoWeekly and Facebook for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

We need your support now more than ever. Can we count on you?

Comments

2 people like this
Posted by Barron Park dad
a resident of Barron Park
on Mar 1, 2019 at 1:41 pm

I remember there was _already_ a committee proposal to build a new middle and/or high school at Cubberley. It was presented to the School Board back in 2015, 3+ years ago.

But it was voted down 3-2 by Ken Dauber, Terry Godfrey, and (one other board member). Todd Collins (not then on the board but now is) was a vocal dissenter.

And the Palo Alto Weekly was also against the idea, if I recall correctly.

This seems like a massive change of heart. Why?


8 people like this
Posted by JR
a resident of Palo Verde
on Mar 1, 2019 at 6:42 pm

"It now stands as a shrine to government ineffectiveness — a 65-year-old set of deteriorating buildings that is the equivalent of an old shed occupying a residential parcel in Old Palo Alto." WRONG. The only thing "wrong" with Cubberley right now is that developers can't make tens of millions of dollars redeveloping it. Come to Cubberley any day of the week and you will see kids, parents, elderly, people of all ages enjoying the facilities.

SAVE CUBBERLY from developers.


2 people like this
Posted by Disco fever
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 1, 2019 at 11:44 pm

“If there is a danger in this fast-moving process, it is that it risks focusing too much on input from the several hundred people who have had time to be involved thus far. They tend to be older, retired residents who are neighbors of or currently utilize the Cubberley facility. It is important to hear from younger families who will be the primary users of this new campus by the time it is completed and from other community members who don't wish to or can't attend meetings.”

And these “older” people haven’t raised children? Or don’t help raise grandchildren?

Is the danger that suddenly what most families need will change?

Experience counts, listen to the old folks who have been working in family spaces longer than whoever wrote this.


4 people like this
Posted by A nearby skeptic
a resident of Greenmeadow
on Mar 1, 2019 at 11:46 pm

There's no need for a new school -- ask the school board about that. There's no need to tear down and rebuild a community center for the city, on school land. I attended some of the Concordia sessions: they're structured to prefer the largest possible project. How about no project? Are we fresh out of worthwhile goals? Is Cubberley not fancy enough? This effort is a waste of time and money that I'd rather see go to more worthy goals, like the teacher whose salary went to Concordia.


3 people like this
Posted by Ms. Wells
a resident of Midtown
on Mar 2, 2019 at 8:58 am

How to pay for it? I won't vote yes on anything Cormack is promoting now that she has voted for more office space.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay up to date on local coronavirus coverage with our daily news digest email.

'A devastating impact:' The coronavirus claims Clarke's Charcoal Broiler, Mountain View's oldest operating restaurant
By Elena Kadvany | 20 comments | 6,167 views

The first few seconds after awakening; before I remember the virus
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 2,995 views

Can you stay healthy without making more trash?
By Sherry Listgarten | 4 comments | 2,399 views

Think about helping others in our coronavirus-affected area
By Diana Diamond | 5 comments | 2,207 views

How COVID-19 Affects Communities
By Jessica Zang | 19 comments | 2,181 views

 

DEADLINE EXTENDED

The 34th Annual Palo Alto Weekly Short Story Contest is now accepting entries for Adult, Young Adult and Teen categories. Send us your short story (2,500 words or less) and entry form by April 10, 2020. First, Second and Third Place prizes awarded in each category. Sponsored by Kepler's Books, Linden Tree Books and Bell's Books.

Contest Details