In this week’s Around Town column, the Palo Alto City Council approves a new law banning idling and a local woman sets her sights on creating a one-piece swimsuit emoji.

LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, STOP YOUR ENGINES! … After squabbling over office development and approving a negotiated compromise on a new hotel tax, the Palo Alto City Council banded together on Monday on the one issue to date that hasn’t encountered any organized opposition: car idling. By a unanimous vote, the council approved a new law banning idling, the practice of keeping your engine on while the car is standing still (sitting in traffic doesn’t count). The council also agreed that the new law will not be strictly enforced, at least not by the Police Department. Rather, the new law amounts little more than an educational campaign involving signs near schools and informative cards issued by the city, explaining the new law and describing the negative impacts of idling on the environment. In lieu of fines, drivers may see some nudging — namely, a council member or a police officer knocking on their car window and asking them to turn their car off. Councilwoman Karen Holman said she occasionally does that when she sees a line of trucks idling at a construction site. Usually, they comply, she said. Despite the law’s general toothlessness, the council united behind the proposal, which came out of a memo issued last year. “I’m waiting to knock on someone’s car window and say, ‘You’re breaking the law!’ Then hand them the card,” Mayor Liz Kniss said. City Manager James Keene also suggested that the city empower a specific kind of outreach consultant to help spread the message. “I think we just need to give this to a bunch of fourth-graders to pass out to folks as they’re waiting near the school and idling,” Keene said.

TAKING THE PLUNGE … After leading a successful campaign last year to add a flat shoe emoji to the popular collection of characters, Florie Hutchinson has launched a new effort to add a one piece swimsuit character to the list. The self-proclaimed emoji enthusiast from Palo Alto has teamed up with Jennifer 8. Lee, founder of Emojicon. The duo’s nine-page application argues that the one-piece swimsuit, also known as a maillot, would complement the bikini currently available. “Given the proliferation of choices within the swimwear category generally — ranging from tankinis, to burkinis, to board shorts and swim trunks — it seems fitting that the instantly recognizable and globally worn one-piece swimsuit join the apparel category for the many individuals who universally identify with it for water-based activities,” they wrote. “With the rise of competitive water-based sport for both sexes, year-round access to water-based recreational activities, increased global travel, and the ubiquity of the swimsuit as the default uniform for the enjoyment of these activities, an emoji of a maillot seems not only timely but necessary. “The application goes on to show charts displaying a comparable amount of search results for swimsuit and bikini on Google, YouTube and Instagram. They also request shorts and briefs emojis be added to give users a comprehensive selection of “modern swimwear.”

Join the Conversation

16 Comments

  1. I always run my engine on my driveway on a winter’s morning while waiting for the demister to clear my windows. This is a safety issue and I won’t drive away with misted windows, so I guess I will have to break the law! Wiping with a cloth streaks the windows and makes a wet mess so won’t attempt that.

  2. The anti-idling action is akin to the CC’s declaration that Palo Alto welcomes tech companies after PA Commissioner/PAF leader Kate Downing’s misleading proclamation.

    If the city wanted to collect anti-idling fines, all it has to do is follow every FedX etc. delivery van since their efficiency contracts with their companies force them to double-park and idle to save time. Their every second of their time is monitored and one poor delivery person was disciplined for helping someone who’d fallen on his route because it hurt his efficiency numbers.

    Welcome to the brave new world.

  3. I have MS. I’m going to d*mn well idle my engine to run the AC every time I need it. Karen Holman and her “Teach Children Civics” anti-idling ordinance isn’t going anywhere with me. Come knock on my window Ms. Holman., we will have a (polite) discussion on unintended consequences and Council overreach.

    Vote them all out. Christmas in November!

  4. Police cars idle, taxis idle, buses idle, motorcycles idle, ambulances idle, delivery trucks idle, jetliners idle…the list goes on.

    Even City Council members ‘idle’…by coming up with ridiculous & impractical ideas such as this.

    The City Manager’s suggestion is just as questionable…having fourth graders hand out ‘anti-idling cards’ to drivers with their motors running. Just wait until some kid accidentally gets hit by a car inadvertently pulling out or in a hurry. So much for teaching ‘civic duty’.

    The mayor’s comment about looking forward to tapping on someone’s car window & issuing them an ‘anti-idling’ card does have some merit…perhaps after handing out hundreds of them she will come to the realization that there is traffic congestion in Palo Alto.

  5. I guess for some, it’s “you can have my idling when you pry it from cold dead hands.” An NRA for idling might be needed…

  6. This is an utterly ridiculous nanny state law. I guess that drive thru windows, delivery drivers and, of course, police officers monitoring on the sides of roads are just going to have to change. Good luck enforcing this prohibition on idling (for any reason) while shooters are making their getaway at midtown Safeway.

  7. To Hoover Man….

    Agreed on relation of idling and global warming…

    Cow’s fart also contributes to warming as every new phone, computer etc., every new human , every airplan , every everithing….

  8. This is the same city that has made cars idle on Arastradero and Charleston road during the commute. If the idle law makes sense then going back to 4 lanes would great for the environment. Instead they are working on tying things more so we will have more exhaust in the air. If the city believed what they are doing to this corridor and Ross road they would be doing it to Embarcadero road. That street is far more dangerous for bicycles then the other roads ever were. It nice that the city can waste our money on pet projects and then say we need a bond for what we need but would not spend money on. Do not trust the city council of city staff.

  9. @60 years in P.A. Exactly! and underparking new developments forcing drivers to circle endlessly searching for parking. The same with two hour limits in the rainbow zones. Plus the idiotic idea that people will move closer to their jobs so that they don’t need to drive to work. People don’t change housing when they change jobs if they can possibly help it.

    What’s up with Liz Kniss claiming we don’t have a traffic problem? Who knew that Donald Trump could infect even liberal politics.

    Vote them all out. Christmas in November!

  10. >>Excessive car idling contributes to global warming.

    But according to the mayor, PA does not have a traffic congestion problem. So one can assume that Palo Alto drivers can are not actively contributing to this worldwide environmental issue.

    We are a very pro-active community.

  11. “I’m waiting to knock on someone’s car window and say, ‘You’re breaking the law!’ Then hand them the card,” Mayor Liz Kniss said.

    City Manager James Keene also suggested that the city empower a specific kind of outreach consultant to help spread the message. “I think we just need to give this to a bunch of fourth-graders to pass out to folks as they’re waiting near the school and idling,” Keene said.”

    What brilliant leadership! What creative “outreach” –telling kids to play in traffic.

  12. Until the City Council improves the flow of traffic, and fines the city for excess idling in traffic that’s supposed to be moving smoothly (fines to be used only to improve traffic flow), the law is only a feel-good, “look, we’re doing something”) diversion from the poor job the city is doing for traffic control.

  13. @Stan Hutchings exactly. What the City has done to Charleston alone is responsible for vastly increased CO2 emissions.. and that’s before CalTrain blocks our east/west vorridors even more.

  14. “the law is only a feel-good, “look, we’re doing something”) diversion from the poor job the city is doing for traffic control.”

    Amen to that. Does the PACC think PA residents are really that stupid?

Leave a comment