News

Amid criticism, Ravenswood school board approves budget cuts

Community criticizes board's lack of action

At a tense, chaotic and at-times hostile meeting on Thursday night, the Ravenswood City School District Board of Education approved more than $5 million in budget cuts to remain fiscally solvent in the coming year.

The board approved, on a 4-0 vote with member Marielena Gaona-Mendoza abstaining, the elimination of 83 jobs, primarily classified staff.

The district is facing a multiyear budget shortfall due to years of declining enrollment and a corresponding loss in state revenue, compounded by several years of deficit spending.

As district leadership continued to insist that Ravenswood is not in a financial crisis, parents, staff and community members at the standing-room-only meeting criticized the board and superintendent for mismanaging the budget and being slow to take action. The district now faces tight deadlines imposed by the San Mateo County Office of Education, which provides fiscal oversight for the school district, in order to balance its budget for the next fiscal year.

"The enrollment trends have been there for years," Ruben Abrica, the mayor of East Palo Alto, told the board. "This crisis that's going on right now, you probably could have prevented it three years ago if you had done some planning."

Outraged parents hurled criticisms from the audience at some board members and at Superintendent Gloria Hernandez-Goff out of turn, prompting board President Ana Pulido to use her gavel to regain order of the meeting several times and to ultimately ask one mother to leave the room.

Many parents and staff spoke in support of Ravenswood's preschool program, the Child Development Center (CDC). The majority of staff there — 28 out of 31 positions — could lose their jobs under the cuts the board approved on Thursday, though the district does not plan to close the center.

Hernandez-Goff said Ravenswood can no longer afford to operate the center, so the district is considering whether the county Office of Education or state Department of Education can assume operations. Some parents suggested the district approach the city of East Palo Alto to help run the program.

Multiple board members stated strong support for preserving the CDC's services, which parents described as critical for low-income, working families in East Palo Alto.

Some teachers urged the board to look to the district office for more cuts, arguing that the loss of the identified classified positions, including support staff for teachers, will have a direct impact on students.

The district plans to cut eight certificated management positions, three classified management positions, three classified confidential positions and 54 classified staff from the 2018-19 budget. Cuts will also be made to adjust the amount of special-education services, including psychological support, for which the district contracts with outside agencies proportionally to the number of students served.

The district has said no teachers will lose their jobs, but staff are planning for a reduction in 28 teacher positions through annual attrition and the conservative assumption that a parcel tax that expires in June would not be renewed by voters. The parcel tax funds 13 teaching positions, the equivalent of $1.1 million.

During a presentation on Thursday, San Mateo County Superintendent of Schools Anne Campbell also characterized the Ravenswood board as slow to act. Other local districts facing budget woes due to shrinking enrollment — caused primarily by the opening of charter schools and the increasing cost of living in the region — have been more proactive, she said, citing Redwood City School District.

"The difference between Redwood City and Ravenswood right now is that over the last several years the Redwood City board has been making budget cuts as they go through to accommodate the declining enrollment and lack of revenue that's generated," Campbell said.

Ravenswood, which currently enrolls about 2,700 K-8 students, has lost about 1,100 students since 2013, Campbell said. This trend is expected to continue in the coming years. Enrollment drives state revenue, with the amount of funding Ravenswood receives determined by the district's average daily attendance, or the number of days a student attends school in a year divided by the number of instructional days.

The district is spending more than it's receiving and also faces the looming, potential loss of $1.1 million if the parcel tax is not renewed this summer, Campbell said. She warned of the more stringent oversight ahead if the district does not make the cuts required to remain fiscally solvent, including the most extreme outcome that the state would take over running the distric.

Campbell said her office is in touch with the state's Fiscal Crisis Management and Assistance Team, which provides financial assistance to counties and school districts, about Ravenswood's budget.

School leadership defended the district's position and the proposed cuts.

Board Vice President Sharifa Wilson, who said the district "looked at every single area" in the budget for cuts, criticized what she described as "the cannibalistic nature of this district."

"There are people sitting there willing to sacrifice other people," she said, referring to calls for eliminating staff in the district office.

Acknowledging that the board has been talking about the budget since at least the start of this school year, Wilson said she's "not willing to kick the can down the road anymore."

In contrast with Campbell — whose presentation included a photograph of a stormy, foreboding sky with lightning in the background, titled "Ravenswood's current financial picture" — Hernandez-Goff said that "what is happening tonight is not a crisis but rather the application of new fiscal principles that will strengthen the future of our district."

Gaona-Mendoza was the only critical board member. She also urged the district to trim the central administration or contracted services such as public relations. She argued that the cuts as proposed could result in further loss of students.

"When we fail the students, parents are going to go somewhere else," she said.

The other two sitting board members, Marcelino Lopez and Charlie Knight, made no comments throughout the meeting.

Some teachers also blasted the district for not soliciting sufficient input from its unions prior to taking action on the reductions. The proposals were presented to the teachers and classified employee unions in negotiations sessions on Jan. 31, but teachers said it was not enough time to provide feedback.

The district is required to bargain over the effect of any layoffs or a decision to reduce a person's hours, but not the actual layoffs, Chief Budget Official Steve Eichman said.

The school district is required to meet certain deadlines set by the county Office of Education, including to present layoff resolutions to the school board on Feb. 22 in advance of a March 15 legal deadline to notify staff who might lose their jobs.

The board will next discuss the budget at a retreat on Saturday, Feb. 17, at 9 a.m. at the district office, 2120 Euclid Ave., East Palo Alto.

Related content:

Webcast: Ravenswood's budget crisis

---

Follow the Palo Alto Weekly/Palo Alto Online on Twitter @PaloAltoWeekly and Facebook for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

What is democracy worth to you?
Support local journalism.

Comments

13 people like this
Posted by Fernando
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Feb 9, 2018 at 8:57 am

As a parent of a 2-yr old, it concerns me that our school district is a circus. My hope is that this gets resolved real soon.
Mismanagement starts at the top!! The bottom line is, bad managers are bad for business, and they're even worse for their employees.
Superintendent Gloria Hernandez-Goff must go and take her cronies with her. Perhaps this would be a smart first step to stop the bleeding!!!!


9 people like this
Posted by Fernando
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Feb 9, 2018 at 9:13 am

Glad to hear that Charlie Knight sat there and kept her mouth shut...wasn't she being investigated by the San Mateo County District Attorney's Office for a possible financial conflict of interest related to the renting of homes she owns to school district employees, during her tenure as superintendent?


21 people like this
Posted by A lot of Drama
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Feb 9, 2018 at 10:35 am

I came out to the meeting and some people asked what exactly it is the board members will do, because they showed no interest in keeping the CDC. I thought the CDC parents/staff gave a great presentation of how the students are doing. The video was quite touching, but it clearly didn't get through to the Board. They say someone else will take over, but I believe it is because the district's administrators and Ms. Hernandez have continued to spend money while knowing well they were taking the district down hill. Some people at the meeting asked if the superintendent's contract will be renewed- I for one hope not.


Like this comment
Posted by XYZ
a resident of Menlo Park
on Feb 10, 2018 at 6:48 pm


Strange... nobody blames FB, Google, Stanford.....
Why?


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Why is it becoming increasingly impossible to open a restaurant on the Peninsula?
By Elena Kadvany | 29 comments | 5,331 views

Firing Judge Persky as a tennis coach was a big mistake
By Diana Diamond | 23 comments | 2,966 views

Electric Buses: A case study
By Sherry Listgarten | 4 comments | 2,260 views

Skeptical of the "skeptics" but not the advocates?
By Douglas Moran | 5 comments | 914 views

Helping Partners Become Couples (vs. Helping Couples Become Partners)
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 675 views

 

PRICE INCREASES MONDAY

On Friday, October 11, join us at the Palo Alto Baylands for a 5K walk, 5K run, 10K run or half marathon! All proceeds benefit local nonprofits serving children and families.

Register now