Open Space District unveils sweeping 'vision plan'

More public access to district lands, focus on families are priorities

Bay Area residents could gain access to much more open space, including more family-friendly areas, according to a new Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Vision Plan unveiled Wednesday night.

The district's long-range plan encompasses its 62,000 acres of mountainous, foothill and bayland open-space preserves and considers how it should approach buying and managing new properties.

The open-space district preserves and encompasses natural areas from Half Moon Bay to Los Gatos, including Palo Alto and surrounding cities. The preliminary Vision Plan Project includes outdoor and recreational opportunities, enrichment experiences such as education and interpretive centers, the improvement of plant and animal habitats, maintenance of coastal agriculture to provide jobs and locally grown food, and protection of culturally significant areas that are at risk of development.

The Community Advisory Committee, a group of consultants, nonprofit organizations and members of the public, developed the plan over 14 months and identified 74 potential projects in specific open-space areas in order of their priority. The district will hold a series of community meetings to gain public input in October and November; its board of directors will view the finalized plan in December.

Directors on Wednesday agreed that the district's preservation of more than 500 square miles since its founding in 1972 has been a major accomplishment in preserving the area's natural heritage. But about half of the land does not have improvements, such as trails that make them accessible to the public. The plan would prioritize opening some currently closed areas and improving others for the enjoyment of families.

Top priorities include: opening the Hawthorn area of Windy Hill with new trails to the Portola Valley trail system; improving access to the Spring Ridge Trail at Windy Hill; reopening closed areas at Russian Ridge and increasing access to vistas and other areas through new trails; reopening a closed section of Alpine Road as a regional trail connection between Portola Valley and Skyline Boulevard; improving trail connections and completing the Bay Area Ridge Trail near La Honda Creek Open Space Preserve; fully opening La Honda Creek Open Space Preserve to the public; developing new El Corte Madera Creek trails at the parking area; improving baylands trail connections with East Palo Alto, Menlo Park and Palo Alto; and working with East Palo Alto on its Cooley Landing project.

The directors suggested adding a provision to work with cities on wildlife corridors in urban areas and to locate and save more open space within cities.

Making improvements to open space, such as interpretive centers and other educational features, is important, but director Larry Hassett cautioned against creating too many facilities that would detract from the core value of open space: creating open, free green corridors.

General Manager Stephen Abbors said the plan's concept of additional "facilities" means designing more family-oriented spaces such as trails that lead to open fields to allow children to romp freely — adding "trails and a bench — not gazebos."

Board members agreed.

"This is an area of different cultures. Families aren't four people anymore; they are 20 people getting together for gatherings," director Jed Cyr said.

The board also considered the pitfalls of too widely expanding the district's role. A vague definition of what the district would protect as "culturally significant" could quickly lead to confusion. While most people would agree to preserve a Native American burial ground, deciding which structures on acquired properties would be saved or razed is a more complex issue, directors said.

The workshop will continue on Oct. 9 at 6 p.m. with directors reviewing the 74 specific projects. A series of public workshops begins on Oct. 21. Workshops take place as follows and will focus on preserves in these specific areas:

Oct. 21: San Mateo Coast/Half Moon Bay regions — Hatch Elementary School, 490 Miramontes Ave., Half Moon Bay, from 6 to 9 p.m.

Oct. 28: Los Gatos Foothills and Sierra Azul regions — West Valley College, 14000 Fruitvale Ave., Saratoga, from 6 to 9 p.m.

Nov. 4: Cupertino Foothills and Skyline regions — Graham Middle School, 1175 Castro St., Mountain View, from 6 to 9 p.m.

Nov. 16: Cupertino Foothills and Bayfront regions — Fair Oaks Community Center, 2600 Middlefield Road, Redwood City, from 1 to 4 p.m.

More information on the project is available at


Like this comment
Posted by Boy Howdy
a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Oct 4, 2013 at 1:18 pm

Now THIS makes me happy!

Like this comment
Posted by resident
a resident of College Terrace
on Oct 4, 2013 at 4:54 pm

I think open space is really great, however it would be even better if it were more accessible without driving private cars. Burning gallons of gasoline to visit these open space preserves seems counter productive in many different ways. How about focusing on opening up some of the gaps that prevent easy non-car access to the open space, like a direct family-friendly way to cross I-280 from Palo Alto? Surely we can do much better than that deathtrap bike lane in the middle of Page Mill Expressway traffic.

Like this comment
Posted by Kazu
a resident of University South
on Oct 6, 2013 at 12:52 pm

If it brings additional traffic and parking problems, the rural communities affected will be much less than happy. That also needs to be taken into account.

Like this comment
Posted by Chris Zaharias
a resident of Crescent Park
on Oct 7, 2013 at 10:39 am

I grew up and live in Palo Alto, love the foothills, and am here to say that the unspoken truth of the Open Space movement is that the tens of thousands of middle class worker bees who would *LOVE* to spend <$2M on new homes above our elite rich in Woodside, Portola Valley & Los Altos Hills have zero voice.

Not proactively working development into the hills' future will eventually harm said hills' protection much more than modest development ever would.

Please feel free to jump down my throat now, I can take it, and no, I'm neither a developer nor a Republican, nor a knucklehead.

Like this comment
Posted by Enid Pearson
a resident of Crescent Park
on Oct 9, 2013 at 11:42 am

MidPen has accomplished a great deal against a lot of odds. The amount of development in this whole area will bring thousands of more people and all parks and open space and recreation areas will become over-used. In my opinion, the primary goal of MidPen for the next 40 years is to acquire 40,000 new acres (at least). The second role might be to make open areas more available to this burgeoning public and connect MidPen's spaces with as many other agencies/parks as possible. Both these goals will require active public support.

Like this comment
Posted by Bob
a resident of Mountain View
on Oct 9, 2013 at 1:22 pm

The stated reason for acquiring open space is to preserve it for use by future generations. Who defines just what those approved uses will be,is the key. Protection of things "culturally significant" is a stated goal. Camping, fishing, hunting, biking, equestrian uses are all significant parts of our cultural heritage, but are never allowed to be seriously considered as open space uses. The decision makers in the district allow public input, but carefully channel and direct that input into areas that they want, and away from those they consider undesirable.
As to future open space uses, if the past is any indication of the future, unless you are a card carrying, sandal wearing, Prius driving environmentalist, this open space is not going to be for you

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Burger chain Shake Shack to open in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 17 comments | 4,912 views

The Cost of Service
By Aldis Petriceks | 1 comment | 1,189 views

This time we're not lying. HONEST! No, really!
By Douglas Moran | 9 comments | 786 views

Couples: When Wrong Admit It; When Right; Shut Up
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 707 views

One-on-one time
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 544 views