CalTrain and High Speed Rail | Nose Under the Community Tent | Paul Losch | Palo Alto Online |

Local Blogs

Nose Under the Community Tent

By Paul Losch

E-mail Paul Losch

About this blog: I was a "corporate brat" growing up and lived in different parts of the country, ending in Houston, Texas for high school. After attending college at UC Davis, and getting an MBA at Harvard, I embarked on a marketing career, mai...  (More)

View all posts from Paul Losch

CalTrain and High Speed Rail

Uploaded: Apr 7, 2011
It would be ironic if it weren't so tragic.

At the same time we have Don Quixotes attempting to garner more federal funds for an ill-conceived High Speed Rail system in this part of the world, a critical local transit operation, CalTrain, is proposing to cut back on its "Baby Bullet" trains in order to close an operating deficit.

I am not a regular user of public transit, although I have been in the past for work from PA to SF.

Would federal funds, assuming they are there, be better directed toward a high speed rail system or a commuter rail system?

I vote CalTrain. not HSR.
We need your support now more than ever. Can we count on you?

Comments

 +  Like this comment
Posted by AMRW, a resident of ,
on Apr 8, 2011 at 12:38 pm

I absolutely think that money should be spent on local transit, rather than the High Speed Rail "boondoggle". I rarely use local public transportation, but many people use it daily to get to and from work. When I was in college at UC Berkeley, we rode BART almost weekly. I can't imagine who is going to ride the High Speed rail? Families going to Disneyland for the weekend? People who want to take a weekend trip to beautiful downtown Fresno?

Also, the majority of the infrastructure for local transit is already in place, whereas the High Speed Rail system is going to all have to be built-often in inconvenient areas.

But, what I really want to know is when are we ever going to get a BART extension so the South Bay?


 +  Like this comment
Posted by Walter_E_Wallis, a resident of ,
on Apr 8, 2011 at 6:30 pm

Walter_E_Wallis is a registered user.

God save us from BART. It is non-interchangeable, passenger only, 3rd rail, low voltage.


 +  Like this comment
Posted by Ken, a resident of ,
on Apr 9, 2011 at 11:50 am

"God save us from BART. It is non-interchangeable, passenger only, 3rd rail, low voltage."

So what? Circle the Bay with Bart (already happening in the East Bay)...finish the job by going down HWY 280, connecting in San Jose. CalTrain can then go up the Peninsula, as it now does, and freight trains are still viable.


 +  Like this comment
Posted by Walter_E_Wallis, a resident of ,
on Apr 11, 2011 at 5:44 am

Walter_E_Wallis is a registered user.

BART is so expensive that it has shaded every other transportation option in this area for decades. Had an equivalent sum been spent on electrifying, upgrading and eliminating grade crossings for our conventional railroads we would b serving far more than 6% of our population. As it is, Frisco should pay the total cost of BART.


Follow this blogger.
Sign up to be notified of new posts by this blogger.

Email:

SUBMIT

Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Get fact-based reporting on the COVID-19 crisis sent to your inbox daily.

Fresh from the water: Popular local fishing boat starts selling seafood at Port of Redwood City
By Elena Kadvany | 2 comments | 6,123 views

Constantly coping with the virus: We need a total lockdown now
By Diana Diamond | 45 comments | 3,498 views

Traffic Lights for the Whole Family
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 2,641 views

Did a hedge fund just steal your EV rebate?
By Sherry Listgarten | 1 comment | 2,082 views

Easing Back to School Anxiety
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 752 views

 

Who is your local hero?

Whether they're grocery shopping for a neighbor or volunteering for a nonprofit, you can spread the joy and support our journalism efforts by giving them a shout-out.

Learn More