Town Square

San Jose Mercury News editorial today

Original post made by Bob, Community Center, on Nov 7, 2013

Re: the defeat of Measure D

This story contains 77 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.


Like this comment
Posted by Green stuff on Robert's building
a resident of Midtown
on Nov 7, 2013 at 5:56 pm

Bob-- but if the mercury news had been against D you would have not had a problem, right? The mercury news is a regional paper and should express their opinion. Plus their is freedom of the press.
[Portion removed.]

Like this comment
Posted by Opinions are like you
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 8, 2013 at 4:56 am

8200 voters voted one way, 6300 voted another, combined low turnout representing just part of the voters, which represents part of the residents of Palo Alto. Nothing wrong with the system, but I'm surprised how upset the "winners" are on another thread in the forum, and why the Mercury News editorial would sting them so much. I happen to agree with that editorial.P

Like this comment
Posted by Disgusted with the Weakly
a resident of Midtown
on Nov 8, 2013 at 6:15 am

Why is the original poster, Bob, allowed to claim the Mercury News editorial "reeked of venom", but why was the comment by one of the responders who compared Bob's comments to the "venom" used by the opponents of D deleted.
The Weekly continues to carry out their one-sided and biased policy against Measure D
[Portion removed.]

Like this comment
Posted by PalyDad
a resident of Palo Alto High School
on Nov 8, 2013 at 6:47 am

PalyDad is a registered user.

[Post removed.]