Town Square

Post a New Topic

Paycheck-fairness bill introduced by Eshoo

Original post made on Jan 25, 2013

Fifty years after a fair-wage bill became law, women still earn just 77 cents for every dollar a man makes for doing equal work. And that disparity costs each individual, couple or family $400,000 to $2 million over a woman's career, according to U.S. Rep. Anna Eshoo.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, January 24, 2013, 3:52 PM

Comments (16)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Joseph E. Davis
a resident of Woodside
on Jan 25, 2013 at 12:48 pm

Another absurd bill written by people that don't understand economics. If women are unjustly underpaid, then why don't you start a company entirely consisting of women, and outcompete the rest?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Dorothy
a resident of Los Altos Hills
on Jan 25, 2013 at 1:25 pm

'Another absurd bill written by people'

Another absurd comment. Written by a man.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Joseph E. Davis
a resident of Woodside
on Jan 25, 2013 at 2:01 pm

What does that have to do with it? Absurd, counterproductive measures are equally so, regardless of who comments on them, or proposes them.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Dorothy
a resident of Los Altos Hills
on Jan 25, 2013 at 2:08 pm

"If women are unjustly underpaid, then why don't you start a company entirely consisting of women, and outcompete the rest?"

And if we pay black folk less, we can start a company with all the cheap labor and out compete the rest?

If some refuse to serve blacks at lunch counters, then the free market will open up a lunch counter for black folk and be really profitable.

Libertarians: please feel free to move to a libertarian country. Try the government-free paradise of Somalia.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Joseph E. Davis
a resident of Woodside
on Jan 25, 2013 at 2:20 pm

Indeed, I think that's what would happen, under both scenarios you posit.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Dorothy
a resident of Los Altos Hills
on Jan 25, 2013 at 2:34 pm

"Indeed, I think that's what would happen, under both scenarios you posit."

Big fan of Rand Paul, aren't you?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by CrunchyCookie
a resident of Greenmeadow
on Jan 25, 2013 at 2:59 pm

CrunchyCookie is a registered user.

Wait a sec, I thought the long-quoted "77 cents for every dollar" (isn't it 79?) thing was understood to be a raw, unadjusted figure encompassing ALL salaries -- a gap that isn't all that vast once you account for women working fewer hours and disproportionately coming out of school with unmarketable horsecrap degrees.

Which is it? Anyone know?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Dorothy
a resident of Los Altos Hills
on Jan 25, 2013 at 3:13 pm

LMGTFY

Web Link

"unmarketable horsecrap degrees"

Unlike your horsecrap degree, which apparently keeps you from googling the info yourself.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by CrunchyCookie
a resident of Greenmeadow
on Jan 25, 2013 at 3:59 pm

CrunchyCookie is a registered user.

A quick Google search wouldn't supply an answer, since I've read plenty of articles from legit news sources that state the contrary.
And sorry, I really don't care enough to sift through a 95-page report. I just thought I'd throw the question out there to invite some fun discussion.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by musical
a resident of Palo Verde
on Jan 25, 2013 at 4:13 pm

Interesting report. Looks like the biggest factor for income has nothing to do with gender -- it's whether you are Asian. (Can I say that here?)


 +   Like this comment
Posted by CrunchyCookie
a resident of Greenmeadow
on Jan 26, 2013 at 8:35 am

CrunchyCookie is a registered user.

You can, as long as you make a footnote that after adjusting for household size and educational levels, all minorities (including Asians) lose compared to whites. Replace "median" with "mean" and I'll bet it becomes a matter of multiples.

Also, I was bored and browsed the report after all. My suspicions were mostly right: the 77 cents thing came from the numbers on page 7 stating women earned $36,931 against men's $47,715. But the only criteria was being a "full-time worker", so we have one pool loaded with $100,000 engineers and financiers and another pool largely skewed by $40,000 K-12 teachers and $30,000 social workers. Weak journalism on the PA Weekly's part for assuming "equal pay for equal work".

Proper discussion of discrimination entails having the right facts first.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Perspective
a resident of Midtown
on Jan 29, 2013 at 7:53 am

Oh give me a break. There is no wage disparity between men and women who do the same jobs. The only 'disparity" comes from women who choose careers that pay less, and/or drop out of careers to stay home and raise kids and lose time/experience, and/or choose less demanding jobs with same degrees in order to be with our kids.
That is our choice, don't make it harder to choose those routes by stupid laws.
Please stop trying to "help" us, you hurt us every time. This will just make it harder for women to find the kind of work they want to do and still have kids.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Young Jose
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Apr 25, 2013 at 11:58 am

I don't believe that there is wage disparity. I just thionk that uneducated people believe there is


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Old Mary
a resident of Barron Park
on Apr 25, 2013 at 12:01 pm

If there is no wage disparity (despite evidence to the contrary) then, no harm, no foul.

But if all we have to go on is Young Jose's "I just thionk that uneducated people believe there is" then, all I can do is say:

Thank you Rep Eshoo!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by FemaleEngineer
a resident of Adobe-Meadows
on Oct 27, 2013 at 10:18 am

I work for a NASA contractor and I am aware of female contractors earning less than male colleagues for the same work.

Pay discrimination is real and this bill will help women like me affirm our right to equal pay. By the way, a women does not deserve to be exploited based on the degree she picks in college. Our school teachers deserve to be paid as much as an engineers because they do very important work.

There are some very close minded "Perspectives" on this board.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Enforce, enforce, enforce
a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Oct 27, 2013 at 1:44 pm

my experience is that it is really hard to enforce this. I have had three jobs in which male employees in lower positions for a much shorter period of time than me quickly surpassed me in income. I also had to endure comments about "not straining my ovaries", and had to return to work 21/2 weeks after three days of labor and preeclampsia. Then I was forbidden to pump breast milk during break time, because the process takes longer than the 10-minute break. And this was only eight years ago!


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Early Decision Blues
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 2,242 views

One night only: ‘Occupy the Farm’ screening in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 1 comment | 2,129 views

First Interview
By Sally Torbey | 10 comments | 1,385 views

Death with Dignity
By Chandrama Anderson | 2 comments | 1,330 views

Guest Post #2 from HSSV: Labradoodle Back on His Feet
By Cathy Kirkman | 2 comments | 414 views