Town Square

Post a New Topic

Television reception

Original post made by TV101, Duveneck/St. Francis, on Jan 23, 2007

I only watch PBS programs couple times a week. I have TV reception problem when watch PBS programs. Is there any ways to have better reception without cable service?

Comments (4)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Christina
a resident of Community Center
on Jan 23, 2007 at 1:55 pm

oftenSorry, but unless you have cable service or a satlite dish, you will often poor reception when watching most channels, including PBS.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by sigh
a resident of another community
on Jan 23, 2007 at 2:45 pm

It's simply not true that your only choice is cable or bad service.

Generally speaking, poor reception is a function of having the wrong kind of antenna, a badly installed antenna, or incorrect cabling.

First, start with www.antennaweb.org to find the correct type of antenna for the stations that you wish to receive. Most likely for Palo Alto you are going to need a medium sized directional VHF antenna, but if you have buildings or trees around you, you will want to have an antenna pre-amp. If you are splitting the signal to multiple TV's, you should make sure that you are appropriately using an amp prior to the splitter.

Then go shopping at www.solidsignal.com for high quality cable, proper grounding, and a high quality antenna. Mount correctly and enjoy clear service.

The other choice would be to get an FTA (free to air) satellite receiver. Multiple PBS channels are available for free with an mpeg2 fta sat receiver. You can set up a rig for a couple of hundred dollars and get excellent PBS reception plus a bevy of free international content and (legally) never have to pay a dime. Google "free to air" for details.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by RS
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Jan 23, 2007 at 5:38 pm

I get pretty goo reception, but it did require me to point my antenna towards South San Francisco, where I was told the majority of transmission towers are.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Douglas Moran
a resident of Barron Park
on Jan 25, 2007 at 4:07 pm

Douglas Moran is a registered user.

If you have an adequate antenna and it is pointed in the correct direction, the problem may be in the cable between the antenna and the TV. That was a problem I had. Previous owner had used RG-59 coax cable instead of the coax designed for longer distances (RG-6 ?) Since replacing the cable was going to be a major hassle, I first tried installing an amplifier and it worked well for me. The one I am using was available at Fry's for $30
Channel Master model 3039 UHF/VHF Outdoor Antenna Amplifier
The amplifier attaches to the antenna, boosting the signal to overcome the loss and noise introduced on the run. Power to run the amp is transmitted over the cable from a box that you plug into a wall outlet near the TV.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Local picks on 2015 Michelin Bib Gourmand list
By Elena Kadvany | 8 comments | 3,502 views

Go Giants! Next Stop: World Series!
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,988 views

Politics: Empty appeals to "innovation"
By Douglas Moran | 9 comments | 1,486 views

A Surprise!
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 1,356 views

It's Dog-O-Ween this Saturday!
By Cathy Kirkman | 2 comments | 516 views