Town Square

Post a New Topic

Sequester

Original post made by Paul Losch, Community Center, on Mar 9, 2013

I lean strongly to the notion of the closer and more local the government is able to meet the needs of local residents and voters, the better.

This story contains 404 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Comments (5)

Like this comment
Posted by Living-In-The-Shadow-Of-Obama's-Sequester
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 17, 2013 at 3:22 am

Paul Losch says that he admires President Obama. Wonder if this article from a British paper offers an explanation as to why so many people claiming to be Dems have so much admiration for this man:

Web Link

These tours, most recently guided by volunteers though monitored by paid Secret Service staff, have been an American tradition since John and Abigail Adams, the first White House residents, personally hosted receptions for the public.

And their cancellation is an austerity measure that saves a pittance, while more frivolous taxpayer funding for items like the White House dog walker continues.

Meanwhile, noble Americans can buy time with the president for a suggested donation of $500,000 to his new campaign group, Organising for Action.
---

And then .. there was the release of over 2,000 illegal immigrants .. supposedly because of sequestered funds:

Web Link

The top U.S. immigration enforcement official acknowledged Thursday that the Obama administration has in fact released thousands of illegal immigrants from local jails over the last month despite prior claims that the release was only in the hundreds.
---

Or maybe Paul Losch was enthralled with the President's public relations push back against the attacks on the Benzhazi consulate, by going on David Letterman and blaming the attacks on a short trailer found on Youtube that was not very complementary to the so-called Prophet Muhammad.

So .. Mr. Losch .. has the sequester endangered your quality of life yet?



Like this comment
Posted by Den Mother
a resident of College Terrace
on Mar 17, 2013 at 10:54 am

Obama's Sequester? Re-write history much?

It was John Boenher who said, after announcing the sequester, that HE, the scotch loving, orange fella, got 98% of what he wanted in the negotiations.

August 1, 2011 - Boehner: "When you look at this final agreement that we came to with the White House, I got 98 percent of what I wanted. I'm pretty happy."


Like this comment
Posted by some guy
a resident of another community
on Mar 17, 2013 at 11:40 am

From the Epoch Times (Feb 28-Mar 6, 2013)article titled "President Obama's Sequestration Strategy to Oust House Republicans";

"Apparently, Obama wants a painful crisis to push Republicans into accepting even higher taxes or losing at the polls in 2014."

"The president is motivated by political gain to manufacture for taxpayer pain. The real spending choices imposed by sequestration and the fact that the president wrote the law that requires it is poorly understood by most voters, and he is exploiting the Bully Pulpit to wrongly blame House Republicans for what will surely follow."

"Americans will suffer needlessly when the cuts come, but Obama, seeing partisan advantage, is putting politics above public welfare."


Like this comment
Posted by Sharon White
a resident of Midtown
on Mar 17, 2013 at 1:19 pm

@someguy copies an anti-President opinion column and ignores the factual evidence of the republican majority leader gloating about the sequester cutting services to the American people.

[Portion removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]


Like this comment
Posted by Paul Losch
a resident of Community Center
on Mar 20, 2013 at 11:22 am

Paul Losch is a registered user.

This topic did not get alot of "legs." It got off track about my comments well into my write-up about Obama (and McConnell.)

Rather than focusing on the key question, which is where best do the spending responsibility and accountability lay--nationally, state level, or as locally as possible?

I do the best I can to deal with genuine questions of local interest. Window dressing such as White House tours or who handles any President's dog goes right past me.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

My Son Turned 20
By Chandrama Anderson | 3 comments | 7,936 views

Questions About the Acquisition of the Buena Vista Site
By Steve Levy | 20 comments | 3,730 views

Guns or Butter?
By Laura Stec | 19 comments | 2,048 views

Nonstarter killed after 2 decades
By Douglas Moran | 10 comments | 1,168 views

Kids and transitions
By Cheryl Bac | 2 comments | 832 views