Sign up for Express
New from Palo Alto Online, Express is a daily e-edition, distributed by e-mail every weekday.
Sign up to receive Express!

Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Palo Alto, California Forecast
TownSquare Forum
(Postings listed from most recent to oldest)
View in an RSS Reader
Choose category to Display:
  ALL CATEGORIES   AROUND TOWN   BOOKS   CRIMES & INCIDENTS
  HISTORIC PHOTOS   ISSUES BEYOND PALO ALTO   MOVIES PALO ALTO ISSUES
  RESTAURANTS   SCHOOLS & KIDS   SPORTS   JAY THORWALDSON'S BLOG
  PAUL LOSCH'S COMMUNITY BLOG   REBECCA WALLACE'S AD LIBS BLOG   STEPHEN LEVY'S ECONOMY BLOG

POST A NEW TOPIC GO TO MAIN VIEW RETURN TO HOME PAGE  
Bookmark and Share
PUBLIC AGENDA: District homework policy, field use, State of the City
Palo Alto Issues, posted by Editor, Palo Alto Online, on Feb 26, 2013 at 11:28 am

A preview of Palo Alto government meetings this week.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Monday, February 25, 2013, 4:17 PM

Add a comment | Add a new topic
If you were a member and logged in you could track this topic

Comments

Posted by j99, a resident of the Barron Park neighborhood, on Feb 26, 2013 at 11:28 am

The trailer park is going to close anyway, PA does not need to discuss the impact of Prometeus on the trailer park residents. The city already has the requirements on notification, moving assistance, etc. [Portion removed by Palo Alto Online staff] Close the park, beautiful Palo Alto and cut down crime. With large big money companies like Facebook and Google a few miles away the thousands of new employees need a place to live- AND THEY PAY TAXES.


Posted by palo alto mom, a resident of the Embarcadero Oaks/Leland neighborhood, on Feb 26, 2013 at 12:40 pm

j99 - I agree about the trailer park. Unless someone with really deep pockets chose to purchase the land, invest major dollars in updating both the utilities infrastructure and the trailers (and that scenario would most likely requiring people moving too), the park is going to close. New housing will be built.

We should instead focus the well-intentioned energy on relocating the residents within a reasonable distance and trying to keep as many of the current students in PAUSD as possible.

Library Commission - discuss how few hours some of our branches are open because we have too many! And no, you can't add the hours together from branch to branch to say that we are open more hours than other places, last time I checked, I can only be in one place at a time!


Posted by Michele Dauber, a resident of the Barron Park neighborhood, on Feb 26, 2013 at 2:19 pm

[Portion removed due to reference to deleted post.] Furthermore, the suggestion that closing BV will "cut down on crime" insults the hardworking residents of BV who are not criminals. They also pay taxes through their rentals. They deserve to be treated like members of the community and not guests. There is no place for this kind of racist intolerance in our community. [Portion removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]


Posted by Library User, a resident of the Palo Verde neighborhood, on Feb 26, 2013 at 2:23 pm

I agree with the poster above re library hours.

We want a library open until 8.00 or 9.00 pm weekdays and 6.00 pm weekends. We also want it opening at the same time every day. I am sick of having to check online before I leave the house to check the library hours for that day.

The library is a service not a business and should be fully functional during recreational hours rather than business hours.


Posted by Crescent Park Dad, a resident of the Crescent Park neighborhood, on Feb 27, 2013 at 10:30 pm

To M. Dauber: [Portion removed due to deletion of previous referenced comment.]

It is impossible to accept any of your opinions when you have consistently shown that you cannot communicate without casting unfiltered & overly exaggerated aspersions [portion removed by Palo Alto Online staff] in your criticisms to PAUSD staff.

You should stop while you're still behind.


Posted by Crescent Park Dad, a resident of the Crescent Park neighborhood, on Feb 27, 2013 at 11:29 pm

I'm fine with the deletion since you deleted the offending opinion. It would make better sense that you change my deletion so that starts at the word "aspersions" as the rest doesn't make sense without the content that was deleted. Agreed?


Posted by Michele Dauber, a resident of the Barron Park neighborhood, on Feb 28, 2013 at 8:49 am

[Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]


Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: * Not sure?
Comment: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:   


Best Website
First Place
2009-2012

 

Palo Alto Online   © 2013 Palo Alto Online
All rights reserved.