Palo Alto finds willing partners in Shanghai Crimes & Incidents, posted by Editor, Palo Alto Online, on Dec 18, 2012 at 3:37 am
Two weeks after a delegation including Mayor Yiaway Yeh and City Manager James Keene made a pilgrimage to Yangpu, the council voted 8-0 to pursue a series of joint efforts with Palo Alto's new Chinese partner.
Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, December 18, 2012, 12:41 AM
Posted by Fix-Our-Streets-First!, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood, on Dec 18, 2012 at 10:48 am
It’s difficult to understand what the City of Palo Alto government thinks it is doing here. The local government can’t seem to manage its own finances, keep the streets properly paved, and has shown now evidence of understanding “technology”. (Just last week it was revealed that its primary database/systems vendor claimed that the City underpaid it over one million dollars for improper use of its SAP product.) Additionally, the recent revelations regarding the secrecy, and possibly improper use of City employees to push the huge project of property developer John Arrillaga under the so-called “radar” proves that the City Manager is not one who believes in openness, or fair play. Perhaps that’s why there is so much interest in the Communist leaders wanting to partner with men like Keene—given the underlying nature of corruption that has always been the bedrock of Chinese culture.
The Weekly’s article did not seem to offer us any insight into how much this trip cost, who actually paid the bills, and what the Palo Alto “delegation” signed, in terms of legal/binding documents.
Given how geographically small Palo Alto is, it’s difficult to see any possibility of the City’s enticing a Chinese property developer to open a “technology park” in Palo Alto. Given the long-term financial issues facing the City, it’s difficult to understand how spending any money on “Sister Cities” makes much sense. That said, given that the Internet allows people to interact with people all over the world--using tools like Skype—creating, and maintaining, “relationships” in faraway places can now be easily done without spending a lot of money. However, the City of Palo Alto does not yet seem to have understood that possibility, as it has not yet offered Skype service to its own residents.
It makes sense for business groups to want to explore business opportunities in the growing Chinese economy. Unfortunately, China seems to be more of a “closed door” (at least at the moment) than a “two way street” for American/European business interests (just ask Google). So, it makes little sense for local governments to be sucked into some sort of “Sister City” relationships that allow Chinese business (meaning the Communist Chinese Government/Army) to gain access to local markets, while American businesses are effectively shut out of Chinese markets.
This matter is probably more of a publicity stunt for the “local delegation” that wangled a (hopefully) free trip to China. Given how spectacularly unsuccessful the “Destination Palo Alto” campaign turned out to be under government control—it’s difficult to believe that much will come out of this “opportunity” with the same stewards at the helm.
Posted by Bobke, a resident of the Midtown neighborhood, on Dec 18, 2012 at 3:20 pm
I am wondering what "We did walk away with some areas where we feel we can take some concrete steps in moving forward," actually means, it would be nice to have some specifics. I have heard about a lot of Chinese companies investing in Real Estate here. This has helped drive up the costs and drive out the natives.
Posted by Joni Reid, a resident of the Embarcadero Oaks/Leland neighborhood, on Dec 18, 2012 at 4:53 pm
Palo Alto has a sister city organization called Neighbors Abroad.Neighbors Abroad has 6 sister cities including a sister city in Enschede The Netherlands. The other 5 cities are: Oaxaca, Mexico; Palo, in the Philippines; Linkoping, Sweden; Albi, France; Tisuchira, Japan. Neighbors Abroad and Enschede have been sister cities since 1980. In 2007 the cities of Palo Alto and Enschede signed an Economic Alliance. Since 2007 officials from Palo Alto have made visits to Enschede and scientists, professors hi-tech and entrepreneurship from Enschede have visited Palo Alto. We already have a viable relationship with a highly technological city in the Netherlands for 32 years. We have had student exchanges with Enschede and other sister cities, but the city of Palo Alto has never assisted Neighbors Abroad by discussing exchange options with the PAUSD regarding Neighbors Abroad student exchanges. Neighbors Abroad operates under the auspices of the city of Palo Alto. Neighbors Abroad is celebrating our 50th anniversary with a series of events starting in February, 2013. Look at our website. The city has functional, operating, and loyal sister cities for 50 years. Ask yourselves Palo Altans, do we really need another one?-even if it is deemed a "partner" city?
Posted by T. Skoog, a resident of the Palo Verde neighborhood, on Dec 19, 2012 at 10:03 am
The origin of the China visit was set up by the Bay Area Council which includes Oakland - who has a major port and airpott, as well as a market area for Chinese culture. San Francisco has a major port and airport, as well as a Chinese market area. San Jose has a Asian Community as well, and a major airport. Those cities have a tax and cash flow with Asian business centers which are on-going and based on massive infrastucter. Palo Alto is a small city - no major airport, no major port, no centralized Asian Community to conduct business. In the mingling with the big boy cities Palo Alto does not have the infrastructure to generate the same type activity. We need to look at the city charter and financial budgeting for the upcoming year to determine the hows and whys that city budget is allocated to this activity - that menans something else is going to suffer in support of this activity. Our schools. parks, etc? Other recent city ativity attacks corporations which provide the tax base for the city. In this PA utopia everything would be "non-profit" - AKA tax exempt which does not contribute to the city coffers, county, or state. The budgeting system for the city needs to be based on the realistic incoming revenue and expected expenditures which are specific to the infrastructure of PA. And we are not transferring technology to the Chinese as a mandate of the city - this all needs to be reviewed within the legal context of technological patent activity.
Posted by T. Skoog, a resident of the Palo Verde neighborhood, on Dec 20, 2012 at 9:09 am
In the SF Chronicle 12/20/12 it reports that China is funding development to Hunter's Point and Treasure Island - both US Navy base closure sites. The Bay Area Council is made up of organizzations which previously reported interest in development of those sites. At Moffatt Field the Navy is currrently cleaning up the site and has carved out Hanger 1 and the air field as questionable to outcome, despite Google offering to support that location for use. Proximity to PA and same players (US Navy, Bay Area Council organizations) suggests that intentions be surfaced now as to outcomes. Moffatt Field is central to the technological center of the bay area.