Town Square

Post a New Topic

Palo Alto casts wide net in search of parking solutions

Original post made on Nov 1, 2012

Faced with constant complaints about a dearth of parking spots on downtown streets, Palo Alto officials are weighing a wide range of dramatic solutions, from building new garages and introducing valet parking at existing ones to installing more electric-vehicle charging stations and beefing up the parking requirements for new developments.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, November 1, 2012, 9:46 AM

Comments (12)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by spend spend spend
a resident of Downtown North
on Nov 1, 2012 at 10:32 am

New parking garages will cost $100 millon each. Not with my tax dollars. If employers want more parking, let them build new garages.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Mary
a resident of College Terrace
on Nov 1, 2012 at 10:50 am

There should be a fee to charge electric cars in City Garages. The owners of the cars shouldn't get free power that is paid with my tax dolloars.

Many Cities charge for parking garages. If the issue is so critical put up new garages, charge for them and also put parking meters on the streets that are very busy.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Crescent Park Dad
a resident of Crescent Park
on Nov 1, 2012 at 12:08 pm

As written in an earlier article - require developers to provide greater number of parking spots for new buildings.

Secondly, join the 21st Century and install parking meters that accept debit or credit cards (or iPhone app).

This is not rocket science and doesn't need a $150K study.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Wayne Martin
a resident of Fairmeadow
on Nov 1, 2012 at 1:14 pm

The link points to a letter sent previously to the City Council about the management of the downtown parking structures--

Web Link

Since the time this letter was sent, the Arrillaga project has been revealed, making the problem even larger.

It's very hard to believe that the current parking structure management--which is effectively the planning department and the City Manager, with nominal oversight by the City Council are up to this job--since none of these people can be held accountable for their decisions.

Wonder if any of the people running for City Council have thought through the issues, and been providing clear visions of what the City needs to do--once they are elected/re-elected to the Council.

It's also kind of amusing that we are paying the City Manager and his immediate staff around $2M in salary and benefits--and all they can do is contract out for "studies" which they then generally follow. What's the point of paying these huge salaries when all these folks do is sign contracts, and follow what these unaccountable consultants tell them to do. Come to think of it, maybe it's not so amusing after all.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by curmudgeon
a resident of Downtown North
on Nov 1, 2012 at 1:20 pm

"What's the point of paying these huge salaries when all these folks do is sign contracts, and follow what these unaccountable consultants tell them to do."

It's the same story as in the private banking sector. Palo Alto pays huge salaries because the neighbors do. If it didn't, the city staff will take jobs elsewhere, and there would be nobody to sign Palo Alto's consulting contracts.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by the_punnisher
a resident of Mountain View
on Nov 1, 2012 at 1:31 pm

the_punnisher is a registered user.

An answer that works in other areas might be the answer here.

Just offer a 99 year lease ( or shorter ) to parking structure management companies. Paying for city parking is a new revenue stream that other cities have. Let THEM build the parking structures!

It appears that many city governments have this " We have to spend TAXPAYER MONEY for a consultant " mantra instead of DOING THEIR JOBS and researching a problem and presenting solutions that work in other cities.

People can be intellectuals and not have a lick of common sense. Is that the real problem in the SFBA?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by KJ
a resident of Crescent Park
on Nov 1, 2012 at 1:55 pm

These don't sound like bold proposals. Talk to Sausalito, LA, and Indianapolis about the flexible-rate, space-tracking and reservation systems they are trying out. There is real-life experience now with smart parking solutions and they should be considered, especially for a new garage. And especially if it's true that paid-up places often stand empty in the garages we have now.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Ducatigirl
a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Nov 1, 2012 at 2:21 pm

We used to have an electric scooter, and it cost about five dollars an hour to charge it, or about twenty-five dollars a day. What must an electric car cost, as they require eight hours to charge? Getting you electric car charged for free is lke getting your gas engine car filled up for free, isn't it?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Concerned Retiree
a resident of Midtown
on Nov 1, 2012 at 2:41 pm

Parking problems and too much congestion -- another argument against the out of scale and out of zoning building proposals by Chop Keenan and John Arrilliga.

Let's look at what it takes to improve our present traffic, parking and human congestion -- and keep our quality of life which we came to Palo Alto for.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Joseph E. Davis
a resident of Woodside
on Nov 3, 2012 at 8:34 am

This may come as a shock to residents of Palo Alto, but the technology to manage shortages of resources like parking spaces has been with us for thousands of years.

It is called the price system, and it works by increasing the price until there is enough of the resource left to satisfy new "customers".


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Watching the Circus
a resident of another community
on Nov 4, 2012 at 7:52 am

Palo Altans and their cars....yuk yuk yuk. Amusing.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Not Exactly
a resident of College Terrace
on Nov 5, 2012 at 9:30 pm

"We used to have an electric scooter, and it cost about five dollars an hour to charge it, or about twenty-five dollars a day"

At 12 cents per kWh, your scooter would have to have been drawing over 40 kilowatts (for illustrative purposes: close to 60,000 horsepower) from the grid to run up that charge.

It looks like someone has been smoking their breakfast.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Early Decision Blues
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 2,131 views

One night only: ‘Occupy the Farm’ screening in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 1 comment | 2,036 views

First Interview
By Sally Torbey | 10 comments | 1,347 views

Death with Dignity
By Chandrama Anderson | 2 comments | 1,262 views

Guest Post #2 from HSSV: Labradoodle Back on His Feet
By Cathy Kirkman | 0 comments | 351 views