Town Square

Post a New Topic

Trying to milk Stanford for money

Original post made by Not so fast, Duveneck/St. Francis, on Mar 13, 2007

Thank goodness the council could not get the 5 votes for this

Web Link

Looks like another example of the council trying to use different standards when dealing with Stanford.

Of particular note is this quotation from Drekmeier:

"This is something they can afford," said Council Member Peter Drekmeier. "

Drekmeier, who prior to his days on the council was an noted Stanford basher, seems to think that Stanford is cash cow that the city of Palo Alto can milk to make up for their ineptitude in managing their resources and money.

By the way, I wonder if anyone bothered to ask Benest, Baum and the rest of our city leaders where they planned to build the affordable housing with the money they would have gotten from Stanford.

Comments (6)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Surprised citizen
a resident of Crescent Park
on Mar 13, 2007 at 10:35 am

They were closing a loophole, not milking anybody. Most interesting is that Judy Kleinberg and Bern Beecham voted against it. Maybe conflicts of interest aren't about cups of coffee after all. There's a little more to it. This is a perfect example.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Not so fast
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Mar 13, 2007 at 10:53 am

It is convenient to call it a loophole by the powers that be--it makes it sound like Stanford is getting away with something.
You will note from today's article the following:

"Currently the hospital is exempted from paying housing "in-lieu fees" because developments providing public benefits were granted an exception in the city's municipal code in 1984. The fees were initially imposed to help cover housing needs generated by developments bringing new employment to the city."

This was an exemption that was granted to all Stanford Hospital by the city in 1984, it is not a loophole.


Please read yesterday's article:

Web Link

and note particularly this part of it:

"Research around the state showed that most cities that charge housing fees either exempt hospitals or leave them to be addressed on a case-by-case basis, McCown said."


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Howard
a resident of Crescent Park
on Mar 14, 2007 at 12:37 am

Fine. Do it on a "case-by_case" basis. And in this particular case, make them pay plenty for their arrogant attempt to aggrandize to themselves further bloated, traffic inducing development.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Not so fast
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Mar 14, 2007 at 6:06 am

Howard, Forgetting that Stanford is mandated by state law to seismically upgrade it's hospital and that Stanford Hospital and Lucille Packard Hospital are world leaders in providing health care--the question as I asked before, is where would you build this affordable housing that you want Stanford to pay for?
You also forget, Howard, that without Stanford Palo Alto would be Gary, Indiana.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Puzzled
a resident of Terman Middle School
on Mar 14, 2007 at 6:22 pm

I thought the city attorney disputed this statement by McCown, Stanford's development coordinator attorney:
"Research around the state showed that most cities that charge housing fees either exempt hospitals or leave them to be addressed on a case-by-case basis, McCown said."

Since Kleinberg describes herself as a housing advocate, this vote is really hard to figure out. Anyone understand it?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Not so fast
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Mar 15, 2007 at 7:42 am

If Baum disputed McCowan's statement is what not reported in the news, I think.
Maybe Kleinberg realized that assessing the fee would require Palo Alto to actually have to build the affordable housing and that would have opened a new can of worms as to where to put it --plus the usual dealings with the "too much traffic", "not enough schools" crowd.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Cho's, beloved dim sum spot, to reopen in Los Altos
By Elena Kadvany | 8 comments | 5,584 views

Why I Became Active in Palo Alto Forward
By Steve Levy | 10 comments | 2,133 views

Early Decision Blues
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 1,631 views

Guest Post from HSSV: Adopt a Naughty Dog!
By Cathy Kirkman | 1 comment | 1,403 views

First Interview
By Sally Torbey | 6 comments | 813 views