Town Square

Post a New Topic

Father pleads 'not guilty' in crash that killed daughters

Original post made on Sep 6, 2013

The San Bruno father who crashed his SUV last November, killing two of his daughters, pleaded not guilty in Santa Clara County Superior Court on Friday, Sept. 6.

This story contains 594 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Comments (2)

Like this comment
Posted by Forgiveness
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Sep 6, 2013 at 6:03 pm

"Nothing that happens is going to be worse than what has happened to him," he said."

I agree.

Lots of bad decisions all around. People should never assume that falling asleep can't happen to them. They should always wear seatbelts! They should move off the roadway completely, not just on the shoulder, to change a tire, if at all possible. Local businesses encouraging this kind of sleep-deprived driving with their ridiculous Black Friday arms race should call a cease fire - Thanksgiving is already the most dangerous driving holiday.

Bad decisions ended in tragedy. A whole family will be trying to overcome this for the rest of their lives. I don't think there's any justice or purpose served in making it so the father cannot help his family with their medical or by getting to work, it will only perpetuate the tragedy in the whole family's life.

No one can take it back, or change it, though I don't doubt that father will live every day for the rest of his life wishing he could. His story is already a cautionary tale of the dangers of falling asleep at the wheel and sleep-depreived driving.

I hope our judges have a place for compassion and forgiveness.

Like this comment
Posted by Alphonso
a resident of Los Altos Hills
on Sep 8, 2013 at 9:17 am

Alphonso is a registered user.

This is why the DA's organization needs to be right sized. There is little benefit having an office large enough to prosecute just to prosecute. They claim this is not meant to "send a message" - how about considering justice?

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


To post your comment, please login or register at the top of the page. This topic is only for those who have signed up to participate by providing their email address and establishing a screen name.

Disputing a Council Endorsement on Attitude toward residents
By Douglas Moran | 21 comments | 3,037 views

Why Are Two Plastic Bag Propositions on the California Ballot?
By Laura Stec | 3 comments | 1,793 views

By Max Greenberg | 0 comments | 636 views

Marriage Interview 16: X-Wife and Widow Issues
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 523 views


Hangin' with the best

The results are in. See who Palo Alto Weekly readers have selected what they feel are the top spots and service providers in the Palo Alto area across 83 categories.

See the Winners