Town Square

Post a New Topic

Palo Alto resident not amused by officer's text

Original post made on Apr 14, 2013

The latest report from Palo Alto's independent police auditor has no smoking guns or damning allegations, but it does contain an incident involving a dating faux pas committed by an unnamed officer.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Sunday, April 14, 2013, 9:43 AM

Comments (10)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Resident of Another City
a resident of another community
on Apr 14, 2013 at 10:00 am

I'm glad PAPD handled this and took the complaint and counseled the officer. I can't say that would be the case in other cities.

It's a minor deal but if someone was put off by it then it deserves the attention it got.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Joe
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Apr 14, 2013 at 10:29 am

One can only wonder if there is a "Code of Conduct" in place in the Palo Alto Police Department that identifies the expected behavior of a police officer?

This incident is barely a blip on the radar--since we've seen Palo Alto Police officers charged with sexually assaulting women that they have detained--to local Palo Alto Police Dispatchers involved with inappropriate access to arrest records for personal use.

The bar for ethical behavior of police officers/staff needs to be necessarily high. There is no reason that this code should not be written down, and officers/staff expected to review it every year.

Sadly, our City Council has never shown much interest in the ethical behavior of the Palo Alto Police Department.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by CrescentParkAnon.
a resident of Crescent Park
on Apr 14, 2013 at 12:31 pm

> According to the report, the woman was offended ("It had not been her intention to cultivate a personal relationship with the officer") and filed a complaint against the officer, who was then counseled by department management about the inappropriate nature of his text.

Part of me want to just say forget about this just a guy looking to "hook up", but then the other part says it's really cheap and scary and when done by someone with authority - is totally inappropriate, even if that person is not in the other person's life. There are a lot of unknown innuendos in an action like this. I think the officer should be fired on giving this more thought. This action really lays out how this officer views being a professional and that he does not take his job or Palo Alto seriously, what he takes seriously is "hooking up".

[Portion removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Hmmm
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Apr 14, 2013 at 1:16 pm

What an overreaction! PAPD has improved, obviously - the woman wasn't assaulted, just asked out - that's a definite improvement.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by knowitall
a resident of South of Midtown
on Apr 14, 2013 at 1:29 pm

Once again, PA online blog readers know more than everyone else....

"Gennaco determined that the department handled the issue "quickly and appropriately.""




 +   Like this comment
Posted by CrescentParkAnon.
a resident of Crescent Park
on Apr 14, 2013 at 1:40 pm

> PA online blog readers know more than everyone else

No one is claiming that, but it seems like you are when instead of just posting your own opinion must take swipes at other people ... just stick to what you can say about you why don't you?

>"Gennaco determined that the department handled the issue "quickly and appropriately."

That's why lapses in ethics and behavior keep happening ... and those are just the ones we hear about.

Back in the 70's corporations have very strict ethics code. If you worked at a certain level for IBM for example it was a bid deal to get a auto ticket. Drunk driving was cause for dismissal.

It seems sometimes that the people with the loudest voice of tolerance do not really understand these issues in the big picture over time.

In the past if an officer got a break like this they would think it was a major luck and good fortune and would never think to do anything questionable in the future ... now, even with many more people vying for any particular job even for less money, people often seem to see it as license to continue whatever dysfunction got them noticed to begin with.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by CrescentParkAnon.
a resident of Crescent Park
on Apr 14, 2013 at 1:44 pm

[Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Hmmm
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Apr 14, 2013 at 3:22 pm

[Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Rolex
a resident of Charleston Meadows
on Apr 14, 2013 at 8:53 pm

Rolex is a registered user.

I wonder how many of you who are so critical of the officer's actions were President Clinton fans. Did you also demand that he be fired? Are the only public officials that should be held so critically accountable are the ones that at the bottom of the public official food chain? Is this really a news worthy item? In any other profession you would never see this in print. So much is happening in the world that deserves public attention. Pathetic are the citizens who find this type of reporting worthy of attention.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by bru
a resident of Crescent Park
on Apr 14, 2013 at 11:32 pm

bru is a registered user.

I was not exactly a President Clinton "fan" but I did not think he should have left office for the Monica Lewinsky thing, that was purely political on the other side.

There is not Republican character assassination committee trying to go after this officer.

Plus, the officer is not an elected official, that is, he was not put in his job by the public.

What I am getting so tired of is the snide pointed comments without logic behind them.

--

I also do not get the editors removal of perfectly civil comments, and then locking this up again to prevent discussion instead of promoting it. Democracy is sometimes messy, if it gets too messy or a problem I can see taking action, but time after time the editors here jump in presumably because they want to influence the direction of the debate and often the reasoning given seems after the fact rationalizations. Just for the record, I resent it.

Create a town square forum or do not create a town square forum ... but if you do not, then do not call it a town square forum.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


To post your comment, please click here to Log in

Remember me?
Forgot Password?
or register. This topic is only for those who have signed up to participate by providing their email address and establishing a screen name.

Grab a Bowl of Heaven soon in Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 2,897 views

Don't fund the rape culture at my alma mater
By Jessica T | 36 comments | 2,486 views

Quick Check List for UC Applications
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 1,986 views

Mothers, daughters, books, and boxes
By Sally Torbey | 4 comments | 1,166 views

Campaign Endorsements: Behind the Curtain
By Douglas Moran | 10 comments | 1,053 views