Posted by Alison Cormack, a resident of the Palo Verde neighborhood, on Feb 22, 2013 at 11:49 am
Two quick updates on this topic. First, the city's report from February 11th shows that construction should be complete in June and that Mitchell Park will open to the public in "late 2013."
Second, I am delighted to announce that the Palo Alto Library Foundation has completed our $4 million fundraising campaign! We are extraordinarily grateful to our hundreds of donors for their generosity. (And we'll still be accepting gifts through the end of the year.)
Thank you again to the thousands of people who voted for the bond and the hundreds of people who donated to our campaign.
Posted by Library User, a resident of the Palo Verde neighborhood, on Feb 22, 2013 at 12:41 pm
I am not sure if I would call it a beautiful building, but it is not as bad as some that are around town. The most I have heard it called is Ikea, South Palo Alto.
I was very disappointed that a book I recently requested the library to acquire because I enjoyed watching it on PBC was refused, due to it being a British book. Call the Midwife. Season 2 will be showed on PBS shortly and is very popular to the PBS audience. The notion that the book a PBS show is based on is not worth buying really surprises me.
Posted by Not so bad, a resident of the Midtown neighborhood, on Feb 22, 2013 at 3:45 pm
The new library isn't good looking, but it isn't all that bad, either. As it is some distance from the sidewalk, it isn't in your face, like the JCC.
My worry is that not many people use libraries any more, as they are rather inconvenient and limited compared to the Internet or e-books. This may have been a huge waste of money, resources, and real estate.
Posted by Susan , a resident of the Community Center neighborhood, on Feb 22, 2013 at 3:55 pm
To Library User,
Have you tried to find your book through LINK+? The library is a member of this service that lets you check out books from many different library systems in California, for free. The way it works is you check it out online and it gets delivered to Main Library for you to pick up. I just got a hard-to-find book from a library near San Diego.
Posted by Anonymous, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood, on Feb 22, 2013 at 5:24 pm
If Flintco is responsible for $2,500 per day since April 29,2012 in liquidated damages, they'll owe over a million before the Mitchell Park Library opens. What are the chances the City collects any of this?
Posted by Pffffff, a resident of the Crescent Park neighborhood, on Feb 22, 2013 at 6:54 pm
1) The new building is actually UGLY.
2) If we were reasonable, we would not have razed what we had, but fixed it, strengthened it and added on to it.
Unfortunately, people were taken in, because the old nice, elegant, Mitchell Park Library was allowed to go without routine maintenance and its paint was peeling, which unenlightened voters mistook for a sign that it had to be razed and rebuilt.
Posted by Nearby neighbor, a resident of the Meadow Park neighborhood, on Feb 23, 2013 at 12:47 pm
The temporary replacement library at Cubberley is just fine. I don't think we need this expensive boondoggle in Mitchell Park. I'm very happy using the Cubberley temporary replacement. Let's sell Mitchell Park Library and keep on using Cubberley!!!
Posted by Infrequent guest, a resident of the Southgate neighborhood, on Feb 24, 2013 at 12:33 am
@Library User: The Santa Clara County Library System has 10 copies of Call the Midwife. Web Link
I visit libraries regularly. My favorite is Los Altos - for their collection, availability, and ambiance. No doubt the new Mitchell Park Library will be an improvement over Palo Alto's current dismal library system, but the collection would also have to improve to make it worth the visit.
The Downtown branch offers a creative variety of adult and teen programs. Palo Alto's libraries have some redeeming qualities, but the collection is not one of them.
Yes, you can always order materials from far away places -- you can do that from any library -- but isn't it nice to browse a well-stocked shelf for an unexpected treasure? Hard to do when you've got 5 libraries to stock.
What's the promised benefit of thinly-stocked shelves? You get to walk to them.
Posted by MadamPresident, a resident of the Old Palo Alto neighborhood, on Feb 25, 2013 at 12:46 pm
@Not so bad
Case for more Public Libraries:
While PA is a relatively well-to-do town by national standards, there are plenty of unemployed and/or poor people living in the town. The costs of devices/internet/e-books that might not make a difference to the many users would certainly constitute an additional barrier to use for not so well-to-do
This would be even more the case for young people. Given the overwhelming proof that library use makes better readers, higher achievers, and more successful workers, we want our young people to feel comfortable coming into their local library
Libraries provide all residents with unlimited access to the reading and information resources that will mean the difference between success and failure for all PA residents as individuals, PAas a town, and the United States as a nation. They are supported by a very modest contribution of public tax funds, and provide a fabulous return on this investment by any measure.
Sure, the library is an old fashioned concept. So is democracy. So is equal opportunity. So is getting your facts right.
P.S. I don't agree in many istances with with how PA Library is run & decisions made
Posted by The Obvious, a resident of another community, on Mar 4, 2013 at 10:24 am
The problem is that the City exempted prevailing wage on this project. Research shows that when you remove prevailing wage protections you increase risk on your project, get more cost overruns, more delays and more problems and lower qualified workforce. This project is a perfect example of that. The City needs to correct this problem by reinstating a prevailing wage policy for the Main Library or this disaster could happen all over again.
A similar library project was completed on time and on budget in Gilroy with many times more local contractors. On the Mitchell Park Library in Palo Alto, built without prevailing wage, 11.7% of the total project value went to local contractors. On the similarly-sized Gilroy Public Library, built with prevailing wage, 71.2% of the total project value went to local contractors.