Sign up for Express
New from Palo Alto Online, Express is a daily e-edition, distributed by e-mail every weekday.
Sign up to receive Express!

Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Palo Alto, California Forecast
TownSquare Forum
(Postings listed from most recent to oldest)
View in an RSS Reader
Choose category to Display:
  ALL CATEGORIES   AROUND TOWN   BOOKS   CRIMES & INCIDENTS
  HISTORIC PHOTOS   ISSUES BEYOND PALO ALTO   MOVIES PALO ALTO ISSUES
  RESTAURANTS   SCHOOLS & KIDS   SPORTS   INAUGURATION BLOG 2013
  JAY THORWALDSON'S BLOG   LONDON 94301   PAUL LOSCH'S COMMUNITY BLOG   REBECCA WALLACE'S AD LIBS BLOG
  STEPHEN LEVY'S ECONOMY BLOG

POST A NEW TOPIC GO TO MESSAGE BOARD VIEW RETURN TO HOME PAGE  
Bookmark and Share
Avenidas makes plans for Palo Alto wellness center
Palo Alto Issues, posted by Editor, Palo Alto Online, on Jan 28, 2013 at 2:56 pm

A consortium of senior and health-services organizations are looking for land to build a wellness center that would focus on seniors.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, January 25, 2013, 12:00 AM

Add a comment | Add a new topic
If you were a member and logged in you could track this topic

Comments

Posted by With what money?, a resident of the South of Midtown neighborhood, on Jan 28, 2013 at 2:56 pm

Prop 13 = a transfer of wealth from young people and families into the pockets of long-term property holders. I'll tell you what--when you seniors get politically active to undo the fiscal mess YOU created with Prop 13, I will support funding a higher level of service for seniors.


Posted by Crescent Park Dad, a resident of the Crescent Park neighborhood, on Jan 28, 2013 at 5:51 pm

Um...pretty ignorant rant.

I was in junior high school at the time of the vote. Senior citizens were getting taxed out of their homes because of out of control state revenue collection. Property taxes were getting to the point that people paid more in taxes than they did to their mortgages on an annual basis.

When you get older, you will benefit from the same paradigm as what is in place today. The senior citizens of today paid the higher taxes 30 years ago while the senior citizens back then could rely upon a more reasonable annual property tax increase. What goes around, comes around.

Transfer of wealth into the pockets of long-term property holders? Nice try.

Property taxes go approximately: 45% schools; 22% county; 18% city; remainder to "special districts". Exactly how does that money go back into the pockets of our senior citizens?

If you want to vent on a Prop. 13 issue, look at how commercial real estate is taxed. That's where the problem lies.


Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: * Not sure?
Comment: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:   


Best Website
First Place
2009-2012

 

Palo Alto Online   © 2013 Palo Alto Online
All rights reserved.