Town Square

Post a New Topic

My value systems are?

Original post made by Ted Rudow III, MA, Palo Alto High School, on Aug 14, 2012

Rep. Paul Ryan as Romney' his vice presidential running mate. At an Atlas Society meeting celebrating Ayn Rand's life in 2005, Ryan said that "The reason I got involved in public service, by and large, if I had to credit one thinker, one person, it would be Ayn Rand", and "I grew up reading Ayn Rand and it taught me quite a bit about who I am and what my value systems are, and what my beliefs are. It’s inspired me so much that it’s required reading in my office for all my interns and my staff."

This story contains 313 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Comments (2)

Like this comment
Posted by wheres John Galt
a resident of Green Acres
on Aug 15, 2012 at 4:19 pm

Ted: I find it as amazing as all the other democrats that Romney picked Ryan. He is NOT a fiscal conservative (he voted for everything Bush wanted.) He wants to privatize Social Security in a way that even Bush/Cheney though was reckless (Bush called it "irresponsible"). Ryan co-sponsored a trans-vaginal ultrasound bill like the one in Virginia (how's that for 'small' government, Ayn!) The list goes on.

Already behind in most of the swing states, this Ryan pick pretty much lock's the race for the White House and gives the Dems a leg up on the (formerly improbable task of keeping the) Senate. While the Dems were favored to gain a few House seats, this GOP ticket may be the gamechanger Nancy Pelosi was looking for to return as Speaker.

Locally, on this forum, I see less of the usual conservations and fringe libertarians posting (anecdotally, of course.) Are they in shock? Ted's Ayn Rand post, in the old days, would have been bombarded by the few, vocal libertarians that post here.

Maybe they all read this from Politico and are going through the 7 early stages of Romney Ryan loss grief (now in denial):

"Away from the cameras, and with all the usual assurances that people aren't being quoted by name, there is an unmistakable consensus among Republican operatives in Washington:Romney has taken a risk with Ryan that has only a modest chance of going right - and a huge chance of going horribly wrong ," Alex Burns, Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Martin report. "In more than three dozen interviews with Republican strategists and campaign operatives - old hands and rising next-generation conservatives alike - the most common reactions to Ryan ranged from gnawing apprehension to hair-on-fire anger that Romney has practically ceded the election. It is not that the public professions of excitement about the Ryan selection are totally insincere. It is that many of the most optimistic Republican operatives will privately acknowledge that their views are being shaped more by fingers-crossed hope than by a hard-headed appraisal of what's most likely to happen. And the more pessimistic strategists don't even feign good cheer: They think the Ryan pick is a disaster for the GOP.

Many of these people don't care that much about Romney - they always felt he faced an improbable path to victory - but are worried that Ryan's vocal views about overhauling Medicare will be a millstone for other GOP candidates in critical House and Senate races."

Along with the first four days of the Romney Ryan team being a disaster (they can't even figure out who''s budget to use, which plan to kill Medicare with, or whose tax cut plan for the 1% to stand behind!) it seems that conservatives are in for a very long 85 days.

Enjoy the Republican convention and try to pretend you don't know you're crowning a ticket that will lose by over 100 electoral votes, dragging the down ticket ballots for the House and Senate with them. With Ryan losing in November and out for 2016, and Christie likely to lose next year, who will the GOP re-group around in 2016?

Another Bush?

Like this comment
Posted by gary not
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Aug 16, 2012 at 12:23 pm

[Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Tava Kitchen shutters in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 16 comments | 12,728 views

Top 6 Issues Affecting Seniors to keep an eye on as Donald Trump takes over
By Max Greenberg | 5 comments | 1,449 views

By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 743 views

Packing for the Women's March
By Sally Torbey | 5 comments | 562 views