Town Square

Post a New Topic

Personal trainer Perry Mosdromos released on bail

Original post made on Jun 12, 2012

He didn't have a "get out of jail free" card, but Perry Mosdromos is out of custody anyway. The 46-year-old personal trainer arrested in a $250,000 drug bust last week was released after posting $25,000 bail. ==B Related story:==

This story contains 226 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Comments (13)

Like this comment
Posted by Palo Alto Resident
a resident of Barron Park
on Jun 12, 2012 at 2:49 pm

It's sad a criminal like this is allowed to be free. Hopefully he has been evicted and lost his "personal training" business. Justice needs to be served.


Like this comment
Posted by "Serving" Justice
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Jun 12, 2012 at 3:49 pm

Where to start? Palo Alto Resident, this is a person charged with a crime, not a convicted one. In our society, accused people are considered innocent until proven guilty. Accused people do have the right to post bail, subject to legal supervision. They have the right to a trial by jury. They are protected, somewhat, against unreasonable search and seizure.

The sad thing is your distorted view of justice in the United States of America.


Like this comment
Posted by Palo Alto Resident
a resident of Barron Park
on Jun 12, 2012 at 5:06 pm

[Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]


Like this comment
Posted by M.Wallace
a resident of Crescent Park
on Jun 12, 2012 at 5:24 pm

[Post removed due to same poster using multiple names]


Like this comment
Posted by "Serving" Justice
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Jun 12, 2012 at 6:20 pm

Palo Alto Resident,

I'm sorry I missed your response. I hope the removal of your comments were based on some sort of reasonable standard, which, unfortunately, I have not always found to be the case. I hope you will respond again.


Like this comment
Posted by Palo Alto Resident
a resident of Barron Park
on Jun 12, 2012 at 8:39 pm

[Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]


Like this comment
Posted by Community Center Neighbor
a resident of Crescent Park
on Jun 12, 2012 at 8:57 pm

Community Center Neighbor is a registered user.

[Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]


Like this comment
Posted by PaloAltan
a resident of Addison School
on Jun 12, 2012 at 10:56 pm

[Post removed due to same poster using multiple names]


Like this comment
Posted by saleha
a resident of Crescent Park
on Jun 13, 2012 at 1:12 am

Whatever happened to innocent until found guilty? I have a problem with people being "outed" for a crime and having their name given until we know the facts. If this guy is in fact guilty then yes, he should be prosecuted for sure, but we don't know what the truth is. And, he may be guilty, but he also may not be. I don't like trying people in the press before we know the facts.


Like this comment
Posted by "Serving" Justice
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Jun 13, 2012 at 6:38 am

Palo Alto Resident--I did have a good night. Thanks for your good wishes. No, this gent is not a "buddy," nor is he anyone I know. Even if he is a "loser" as you say--and his position right now does not look good--he still has a right to walk the streets unless he's much more of a danger to society than the justice system thinks he is. After all, the authorities have seized the drugs he's alleged to have accumulated.

saleha--I agree that trying people in the press is a bad idea. Here's a case where freedom of the press conflicts with an individual's rights. Prosecutors and police get to lay out their whole case, and the alleged criminal has very little power to publicly defend himself or herself against the allegations.


Like this comment
Posted by Retired Teacher
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Jun 13, 2012 at 9:18 am

Retired Teacher is a registered user.

I posted under the name "Serving" Justice. Although I disagree with Palo Alto Resident, I can't believe his or her most recent comment was deleted! There was nothing in that comment that deserved censorship. Really, Palo Alto Weekly staff, can you justify these apparently random judgments? Please point out what in the world in the posts you cut was so offensive as to be unpublishable!


Like this comment
Posted by Community Center Neighbor
a resident of Crescent Park
on Jun 13, 2012 at 10:08 am

Community Center Neighbor is a registered user.

And the fact that the police found evidence of him having over 4,000 illegal drugs delivered so that he can sell them doesn't mean he's guilty?

All you people need to re-read the facts in this case before you go posting your confrontational opinions. What's your investment in defending a total stranger anyway? Sounds fishy.


Like this comment
Posted by That User Name is already
a resident of another community
on Jun 13, 2012 at 10:12 am

That User Name is already is a registered user.

Q: "What's your investment in defending a total stranger anyway?"

A: the Constitution


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Naked Men and Pineapple with Tomato
By Laura Stec | 15 comments | 10,381 views

French Laundry alums to open Palo Alto restaurant
By Elena Kadvany | 15 comments | 9,061 views

Candidate Kickoff Events: Public, not just for supporters
By Douglas Moran | 4 comments | 1,785 views

Water, baking soda, vinegar and slime
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 541 views

 

Hangin' with the best

The results are in. See who Palo Alto Weekly readers have selected what they feel are the top spots and service providers in the Palo Alto area across 83 categories.

See the Winners