Town Square

Post a New Topic

CalTrain and High Speed Rail

Original post made by Paul Losch on Apr 7, 2011

It would be ironic if it weren't so tragic.

At the same time we have Don Quixotes attempting to garner more federal funds for an ill-conceived High Speed Rail system in this part of the world, a critical local transit operation, CalTrain, is proposing to cut back on its "Baby Bullet" trains in order to close an operating deficit.

I am not a regular user of public transit, although I have been in the past for work from PA to SF.

Would federal funds, assuming they are there, be better directed toward a high speed rail system or a commuter rail system?

I vote CalTrain. not HSR.

Comments (4)

Posted by AMRW, a resident of another community
on Apr 8, 2011 at 12:38 pm

I absolutely think that money should be spent on local transit, rather than the High Speed Rail "boondoggle". I rarely use local public transportation, but many people use it daily to get to and from work. When I was in college at UC Berkeley, we rode BART almost weekly. I can't imagine who is going to ride the High Speed rail? Families going to Disneyland for the weekend? People who want to take a weekend trip to beautiful downtown Fresno?

Also, the majority of the infrastructure for local transit is already in place, whereas the High Speed Rail system is going to all have to be built-often in inconvenient areas.

But, what I really want to know is when are we ever going to get a BART extension so the South Bay?


Posted by Walter_E_Wallis, a resident of Midtown
on Apr 8, 2011 at 6:30 pm

Walter_E_Wallis is a registered user.

God save us from BART. It is non-interchangeable, passenger only, 3rd rail, low voltage.


Posted by Ken, a resident of Midtown
on Apr 9, 2011 at 11:50 am

"God save us from BART. It is non-interchangeable, passenger only, 3rd rail, low voltage."

So what? Circle the Bay with Bart (already happening in the East Bay)...finish the job by going down HWY 280, connecting in San Jose. CalTrain can then go up the Peninsula, as it now does, and freight trains are still viable.


Posted by Walter_E_Wallis, a resident of Midtown
on Apr 11, 2011 at 5:44 am

Walter_E_Wallis is a registered user.

BART is so expensive that it has shaded every other transportation option in this area for decades. Had an equivalent sum been spent on electrifying, upgrading and eliminating grade crossings for our conventional railroads we would b serving far more than 6% of our population. As it is, Frisco should pay the total cost of BART.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Handmade truffle shop now open in downtown Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 3 comments | 2,407 views

Why is doing nothing so difficult?
By Sally Torbey | 7 comments | 1,107 views

Breastfeeding Tips
By Jessica T | 6 comments | 970 views

Weekly Update
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 734 views

Call it a novel: Dirty Love by Andre Dubus III
By Nick Taylor | 1 comment | 265 views